Unmasking Muhammad: The Malignant Narcisist & His Grand Delusion Allah

Unmasking Muhammad: The Malignant Narcisist & His Grand Delusion Allah [eBook/PDF]

ISLAM is a dark chapter in human history
written by Alla Tappa , April 27, 2010

Very many thanks and with folded hands,here that I appreciate ,admire and applaud this study,research of the author.One of the greatest calamity that befell on the great nation of INDIA and it's timeless,spaceless philosophy,values,principles was the invasion,conquest,destruction,rape,loot ,enslavement, colonization-slavery and ruling carried on by the most cruel monsters of that most inhuman,bigoted,cruel,bloodthirsty rapist non-prophet MO and his wicked followers Mohammadens. One would think that present day INDIANS are uniquely suited and equipped to tell the world that what happened in the history to that glorious civilization of INDIA ,under ISLAMIC rule by grasping truth and presenting the truth of history. Alas , it is not happening . Reason is that GANDHI and Nehru as leaders of INDIA and rulers clamped down on INDIANS and passed FATWAS that INDIANS must not read the history of india under ISLAM ,must not publicize it and must not talk about it hence forth. And so the deception,dis/misinformation ,fabrications goes on. Result is that INDIA/INDIANS live under the threat of ISLAMISM/ISLAMISTS as captives even today. The most desirable thing that must happen now is the eradication of this most cruel,most evil,most primitive ,fascist,intolerant,totalitarian dogma ,exclusivist hate filled theology(cult) - known as ISLAM. This will do enormous good for the peace,progress,prosperity of human civilization. I am so happy that this author has contributed immeasurably for the advancement of humanity by exposing the monster ISLAM . We owe a debt of gratitude to the ex-moslems such as ALI SINA, ANWAR SHAIKH, IBN WARRAQ, M A KHAN, ABUL KASEM, AYAN HIRSCHI ALI, WAFA SULTANA , NONI DARWISH , TASLEEMA NAZREEN and many more.

This is from the author
written by Sujit Das (Author) , April 28, 2010

Dear valued friends

I took nine months to write this book. I have lost count how many full-nights I have spent in front of the computer and in my library to write this book. Now when I see the book is published, I am unable to control my tears.

Now it’s all yours, my most valued friends – absolutely free of cost. I could publish the hardcopy of this book for a cost, but I don’t want money. I only want to see the demise of Islam in my lifetime. I have done my job. Now it is up to you to spread the truth.

If all of us work together, we will be able to gift our children and grandchildren a world free of Islam.

Send this book every corner of the world. Send it to all your friends and relatives. Also send it to mental health therapists and their associations. Send it to other websites also. If you run a website, please include the book there. Ultimately it is truth which will destroy Islam.

Contact me whenever you feel.

Thanks and best regards

Sujit Das (The Soldier of Truth and Defender of Humanity)

for 72 virgins and eternal erection i will believe anything
written by for 72 virgins and eternal erection i will believe anything , April 28, 2010
for 72 virgins and eternal erection i will believe anything

REALLY NICE BOOK.

Islam Rising: Civilization Falling

The Muslim Call to Prayer is one of the Prettiest Sounds on Earth

-Barack Obama

A few citizens in Hamtramck, Michigan don’t agree with the president on this one:

Although hundreds of long-time residents of Hamtramck, MI protested the city allowing the five-times-per-day Muslim call to prayer to be broadcast over Hamtramck’s loudspeakers, the city council voted unanimously in April 2004 to allow it.

Lucky for the residents of Dearborn Heights, where calls to prayer are blasted five times per day, a schedule of the call times is available so they can go indoors and shut their windows.

If the noise isn’t irritating enough, consider the feelings of non-Muslims who don’t welcome the message that Allah is the only true God.

Hell- bent on mimicking Western Europe’s practice of cosseting Muslims, not matter how extreme their behavior may become, the president has ordained that all allusions to Islam be stricken from national security documents.

Obama’s boss, unrepentant Nazi collaborator, George Soros always thought we made too much fuss about 9/11 anyway—an event he found “inspiring”:

Hijacking fully fueled airliners and using them as suicide bombs was an audacious idea, and its execution could not have been more spectacular. (George Soros, “The Bubble Of American Supremacy,” The Atlantic Monthly, 12/03)

Even the Army has been befouled by this irrational Islamophilia, leading, inexorably to the massacre at Fort Hood by a Muslim jihadi who all but tweeted the exact date and time of his planned terrorist attack.

Life in Western Europe hasn’t exactly improved as a result of Islamo- appeasement. Diana West:

How can anyone who values freedom of conscience, equality before the law and other such Western jewels not have a healthy fear of Islamic law, which values none of these things? Incredibly, this is an emotion that is supposed to be suppressed and, in Europe, on pain of prosecution

Dutch parliamentarian, Geert Wilders is one victim being persecuted for speaking the truth about Islam. His short documentary film, Fitna, created a huge fracas in Western Europe as well as the Middle East.

Politically correct pundits and pols have been insisting since 9/11 that Islam is a Religion of Peace and that jihad is the result of some kind of “misinterpretation” of the Koran

If that’s the case, Osama bin Laden had better take a review course:

The idea that the Koran commands them to do violence to unbelievers runs from the very top of the international jihadist movement – Osama bin Laden – down to the rank and file. Overall, it is extremely rare – if not impossible – to find a jihadist who does not cite the Koran to justify his actions. http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/07/the-complete-infidels-guide-to-the-koran-by-jamie-glazov/

Islam Rising, produced by the Christian Action Network, features Wilders, who is currently running for Prime Minister in the Netherlands. Wilders’ crime was to point out that violent jihad comes directly from a literal reading of the Koran.

Wilders is a forthright critic of Islamic extremism, having the audacity to disparage the Koran itself. He’s in excellent company. Winston Churchill compared the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, proclaiming Mein Kampf to be: “the new Koran of faith and war: turgid, verbose, shapeless, but pregnant with its message.”

Mark Steyn knows something about being persecuted for speaking the truth about radical Islam. Commenting on Wilder’s trial for the crime of “group insult” of Islam, Steyn astutely observes:

At a certain level, the trial of Geert Wilders for the crime of ‘group insult’ of Islam is déjà vu all over again. For as the spokesperson for the Openbaar Ministerie put it, ‘It is irrelevant whether Wilder’s witnesses might prove Wilder’s observations to be correct. What’s relevant is that his observations are illegal.’

Even Glenn Beck has maligned Wilders, calling him a “fascist.”

Islam Rising makes it manifest that America is doggedly following the same path as Europe did years ago when the politicians decided it was better to indulge terrorists than to resist them. America is under the rule of America hating radicals and a radical president , reared as a Muslim himself, who is brazenly sympathetic toward Islamic extremism. It’s up to citizens to educate themselves. Films like Islam Rising deserve wide circulation and its creators deserve our appreciation for their boldness.

Allah’s Challenges in the Quran and Its Missing Chapters

Allah threw open challenges to man as well as Jinn to create a book like the Quran or at least a chapter of it and that he would keep the Quran unchanged for eternity. He failed in both challenges. Find out why?

---

Challenging someone or an open challenging to all on an issue is a means of maintaining integrity of a challenger. It is not easy for someone to challenge on any subject, howsoever a master or expert one is in his/her field. One can throw a challenge only when he/she is 100% sure that he can never fail or be proven wrong.

But what happens if someone takes on the challenge and proves the challenger wrong? Undoubtedly, the challenger is dismayed and mortified; and people, who erstwhile cherished the challenger, start avoiding him/her, not to be deceived again.

Here, we will discuss about Allah, whom Muslims consider to be the god of the universe, who eagerly throw open challenges to mankind in the ‘Quran’. In this book, he asserts that his words are unchangeable (Quran 15:9) and brimming with his wisdom and that no one else in the entire universe can reach his level of elegance. He even challenges other creatures besides mankind, the Jinns (invisible creatures), to assist mankind to create a replica of the Quran or at least a single Sura (chapter), in order to prove that the Quran is not from God.

It was, indeed, a very brave challenge for Allah, intended to boosts His honor and the belief of skeptics that the Quran was truly a creation of God.

Allah in his book ‘Quran’ Chapter 2 in verse 23, that to produce single chapter as he has in his book Quran. Translation is as follows:

“And if you all are in doubt about what I have revealed to My servant, bring a single chapter like it, and call your witnesses besides God if you are truthful.” (Quran 2:23)

Quran 17:88 goes:

“Say: ‘If all mankind and the jinn would come together to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce its like even though they exerted all and their strength in aiding one another.’”

Interesting point is that the Quran’s two shortest chapters contain only 3 verses. The names of the chapters are Al-Asr and Al-Nasr.

Some sects in Islam claim that two chapters---named Sura Al-Wilayat and Sura Al-Nurain---originally intended for the Quran, are missing from its current version.

Sura Al-Wilayat

Translation:

On the name of the all merciful God,

1. You who are believers, believe in the prophet and the saint (patron, God-man)"which is Ali Bin Abi Taleb, Mohammed cousin" which we sent, they will guide you to the strait path.

2. A prophet and a saint "belong to" each other, and I am the all knowing, the experienced.

3. Those who do (obey) God's covenant they "deserve" comforting paradises.

4. And those who if it read to them our verses, they contradict it.

[Meaning: If somebody (unknown) were to read the verses (from the Qur'an) to them, they reject would it.]
5. They have a great (big) place in Hell, if they called in the day of judgement: where is the unfair, the contradictory for the messengers?

6. The messengers don't leave them "without" the truth, and God "will not allow them" to win (appear, show) till a short time.
7. Praise your lord "and" thank "him", and Ali "Ali Bin Abi Taleb, Mohammed’s cousin, "one" from the witnesses.

Suran Al-Nurain

Translation:

"O you who believe, believe in the two lights

He has revealed them unto you, warning you against the torture of the Great Day -- two lights emanating from one another, for I am the All-Hearing and the All-Knowing.

Truly those who fulfill Allah's pledge and his Apostle's verses shall be rewarded with Paradise.

Those who disbelieve by breaking their covenant and what they have pledged to do before the Apostle shall be thrown into hell, for they did injustice to themselves and disobeyed the supporter of the Apostle.

Therefore, they shall be caused to drink from the Hamim River in hell.

Truly Allah is the light of heaven and the earth as he wills, and he has chosen his angels and apostles and made believers of those whom he created.

All do whatever he wills. There is no god but him -- the Merciful and the Compassionate.

Those who came before them cheated their apostles, and so I have stricken them with my cunningness vehemently and painfully.

O Apostle! Preach my admonition, for they shall know.

Those who fulfill their pledge to you are likened to me to be rewarded by Paradise.

Truly Ali is one of the pious. We have sent Moses and Aaron, being appointed his successor, yet they disobeyed Aaron.

Be of good patience! They will become old. We have given you judgment, just as we did to other apostles before you. We have appointed a guardian to you from them, that they might return.

Truly Ali is devout, lying prostrate at night, warning as regards the Last Day, and hoping for the mercy of his Lord.

Say: "Should those who act unjustly be treated equally, while they know my torture?"

Today, these two Suras (chapters) are missing from the Quran. This claim has been made by a sub-sect in Shiaism. However, not all Shias hold this claim but stick, like Sunni Muslims, with the idea that the Quran has never been changed.

There is nothing strange, surprising or shocking in this attitude of Sunni Muslims, who tactically tried and are still trying to defend the action of Othman, the third caliph of Islam, who deteriorated credibility of the Quran by burning its original texts, after compiling whatever suited his interests.

However, what is strange, surprising and shocking is that the Shias, despite their scornful attitude toward Sunnis, have swallowed up as truth of “twelve imamates”, whatever the Sunni Muslim have dished out to them about the truthfulness of the Quran. They have provided the reason that there was confusion in Arabic grammar and pronunciation in various parts of Arabia at the time that made it difficult for many Arabs to utter the words of the Quran precisely; hence, the meaning of the Quran was misinterpreted. Consequently, they had to think seriously about this matter and the reformation in the Quran was higher necessity.

Here, I would like to shed light on the behavior of Shia Muslims against Sunni Muslims and their hatred toward each other. Shia Muslims, the followers of Ali, not only rejected and reject Abu Bakar and Umar, the first two caliphs of Islam, respectively, but the caliphate of Othman, who was, according to Shias, elected by fault. When Othman ordered to burn original texts of the Quran, he was nearly eighty. Apparently, a person in his late seventies can be easily manipulated; on the other hand, Othman also appointed his kinsmen and close cousins and relatives to higher positions in different parts of caliphate, after he threw the rightly appointed off from their posts. Amir Muawiya, the close cousin of Othman and the governor of Syria, manipulated Othman to burn original text of the Quran in order to take his revenge that he and his father, Abu Sufyan, suffered on the day of Conquest of Mecca, when Muhammad destroyed all respected gods and idols of Arabia, which Abu Sufyan and Muawiya had to watch helplessly, and could nothing to save their age-old revered gods and idols.

Conclusion

My objective is not to establish what happened to these chapters or who eradicated them from the Quran. But let’s suppose that these chapters were not revealed to be included in the Quran, but were created by man. What the readers should note is how beautiful, elegant and eloquent these two chapters are, much better than many chapters of the Quran, which threatens Allah’s open challenge that no-one can create a chapter like those of the Quran. Thus, not only one chapter but two chapters have been created by man like a mirror through which a humiliated and disgraced Allah can see Himself.

Now, I have a simple question to all Muslims: Have not Allah lost His challenge in Quran 2:23, therefore, His honor and integrity as the claimed God of the universe?

Muslims can help maintain Allah’s honor and integrity only by accepting that those two chapters were indeed revealed by Allah for inclusion in the Quran. In that case Allah again fails in His promise/challenge to maintain the Quran unchanged.

Muhammad in Medina: A Prophet of Peace Has Come

An account of the dreadful, bloody activities of the so-called Islam's prophet of peace, after his arrival in Medina...

---

Introduction

This article tries to give what one might call a “macro” view on Muhammad's peaceful stay in Medina.

In particular I discuss how Muhammad dealt “wisely” with the Jewish tribes of Medina.

After thinking/claiming that he is the prophet of the almighty, Muhammad stayed in Mecca about thirteen years. He was not a happy camper. Most people thought he was a crazy man. He managed to have some followers (around a hundred), mostly low-class folks. He had in mind leaving Mecca all along. He sent a team to Abyssinia (Ethiopia), and he himself tried Ta'if in 619. In both instances, he did not find it suitable for him to migrate to any of those two places. Finally, things worked out for him to go to Yathrib (Medina). Please do not be fooled by Muslims claiming great persecution and plots to kill Muhammad in Mecca. This is not true. The reader is advised to read M. A. Khan's discussion of this matter in his book “Islamic Jihad”.

The first couple of years in Medina were rough on Muhammad and the Muslim community (the Muhajiroon, “immigrants”, as well as the Ansar “the locals of the Medina area”). Some found menial jobs here and there. But, it was rough. Right from the start, Muhammad was looking for loots. He tried to ambush Meccan trade-caravans. His looting attempts did not meet much success at the beginning. However, the Nakhla raid proved to be the first success. Muhammad and his Sahaba Muslims (robbers!!) made a good loot out of that one. For more details on that raid, I refer the reader to my previously published article.

Now, Muhammad in Medina had many members of the Quraysh tribe with him. He had others from other tribes. He had an open invitation to others to join him. Many did join him as their tongues were dripping for greed of loots. They could just taste those loots. So, in a tribal environment, Muhammad established a tribal alternative called Islam. This was a very smart step on Muhammad's side. He established an “open” tribe system so that other individuals from other tribes join. You can call it Muhammad's tribe or Muhammad's cult. This was a good plan for Muhammad. It allowed him to give membership to more “warriors” and “robbers”. The more people he has, the more powerful his “tribe” is. Arabs lived in a tribal system. Power and physical force ruled the day. So, Muhammad's “cult” plan was sure to succeed. There is no shortage of individuals in different tribes to join Muhammad in his quest for loots, and, as an added bonus, Muhammad made it look like a holy cause commanded by the most high; Allah.

Medina's Makeup

There were two Arab tribes in the Medina area; the Aws and the Khazraj. Many of them worked for the more prosperous Jewish tribes in Medina. They worked in agriculture, warehouse and shop watchers. The three Jewish tribes in Medina were more educated and prosperous. Those tribes were Bani Qainuqa, Bani Nadeer, and Bani Qurayza. Those tribes had some power. Muhammad signed a pack of protection with them when he first came to Medina. It was not until he was in Medina for a year and a half that he realized that the Jewish tribes knew he was an imposter. So, he changed the Muslims' prayer direction from Jerusalem to Mecca, and decided that he was powerful enough to take down the Jewish tribes one by one, and enrich the Muslim Umma with their wealth and women. Below I narrate how he did that, one tribe at a time.

Bani Qainuqa

A Muslim woman goes to a Qainuqa tribe goldsmith shop. He flirts with her. She doesn't like that and rejects his advances. He pins her skirt, without her noticing, to the ground. When she gets up, her skirt stays down, and her private area gets exposed. Those who are present get a big laugh out of that incident. A present Muslim gets upset and kills the goldsmith. Jewish men rush to help and kill the Muslim man, who killed the goldsmith. A riot ensues. Muhammad hears the news. He orders besieging the Qainuqa tribe. About two weeks later they surrender to Muhammad on condition that they leave the city leaving all belongings behind except what their animals can carry. All the fortunes that the tribe left behind went to the immigrant Muslims in Medina. It was pretty much no hard-earned loot by any means.

It is clear that such a trivial incident could have been handled wisely by Muhammad. After all one man from each side was killed. Isn't that enough? Off course it is. But Muhammad was facing pressure from the immigrants who left Mecca and joined him. They had a lot of need. What’s better than loot from a rich tribe to satisfy their greedy hearts!

Bani Nadeer

Next in line were Bani Nadeer on Muhammad's mind. The prophet Muhammad goes to Bani Al-Nadeer, along with some leading companions, Abu Bakr, Umar and Ali, and asks them to help him in paying bloodwit money for two men of Bani Amer mistakenly killed by Muslims. It is important here to remember that Bani Al-Nadeer were under no obligation to help Muhammad here. The agreement between the Muslim camp and the Jewish tribes of Medina was to help each other in case there is an external threat to attack Medina (i.e. Quraysh coming to town to attack the Muslims, or the Medinan tribes).

Bani Al-Nadeer tell Muhammad that they will help him with money.

Muhammad leaves the other Sahaba in the meeting and vanishes. He actually went back home.
His Sahaba leave after they realize that Muhammad was not going to come back.

When the Sahaba see the prophet, he tells them that the Jews, Bani Al-Nadeer, were conspiring to kill him. How? By having someone go on the top of the wall that was behind them where they were meeting, and dropping a rock on him (Muhammad) thus killing him.

Muhammad gives orders to prepare for war against Bani Al-Nadeer, and marches against them. He lays siege upon Bani Al-Nadeer, who sought refuge in their forts. He also orders the burning and destruction of their palm trees (Bani Al-Nadeer were mostly farmers who tended the land and raised crops). Orders were carried out to the letter.

Bani Al-Nadeer receive some promises of help from other tribes that never materialized and finally struck an agreement with the prophet (PBUH) to allow them to leave town with all their belongings except their weapons and immoveable properties. This, in fact, came to pass. Some of them went to Khaiber and some went to Syria.

All of their left property and land became Muhammad’s. He distributed it amongst the first immigrants, and a couple of Ansars who were in need. (What a generous thief!!)

The above, pretty much sums up what happened. Please note that Bani Al-Nadeer were in no position to fight Muslims. Muhammad has become the main war lord of Medina by now. Earlier, he had successful attacks against the Meccan commercial caravans. Two years earlier, he had attacked and gotten rid of the Qainuqa tribe from Medina. He had just assassinated Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf, the Bani Al Nadeer leader. He suffered no consequences from all this. This, in my view, indicates that a farming community like Bani Al-Nadeer was in no position to put up a good fight against the Muslims.

So, when Muhammad went to them asking for money to help the Muslims, who killed two men from another tribe, Bani Al-Nadeer were under no obligation to help him financially. But they knew what Muhammad was up to. He was looking for their refusal to pay, so that he can have a reason to attack them in war and take their belongings. However they were smart enough to tell him that they’ll help him. That answer did not sit well with Muhammad, and so he leaves in a hurry and invents the story that they were plotting to kill him with a big rock dropped from the top of a wall behind where they were sitting. What a ridiculous story. Even a naïve person can read between the lines and see that they, Bani Al-Nadeer, if wanted, could have killed all the Muslims leaders who waited long after Muhammad left in a hurry. After all, Muhammad and his Sahaba in the meeting were probably no more than five or six men, sitting in the heart of Bani Al-Nadeer tribe. Bani Al-Nadeer could have killed them all right then during that meeting. This did not take place, and we are supposed to believe that ridiculous story about the Jews trying to kill his holiness, Prophet Muhammad the First, with a big rock! Only a man with no reflective thinking ability can believe such a story. The fact of the matter is: Muhammad wanted to attack them, one way or another. He hoped they will say no to his money request. When this did not work out, he invented the “rock from the top of the wall” story. And, amazingly enough, Muslim apologetics buy into such a story. Religious fervor blocks their brain cells, and no analytical thinking is done. They just believe a ridiculous story and move on.

Bani Qurayza

The divine command comes to Muhammad while taking a bath:

Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 68:
Narrated 'Aisha: When Allah's Apostle returned on the day (of the battle) of Al-Khandaq (i.e. Trench), he put down his arms and took a bath. Then Gabriel whose head was covered with dust, came to him saying, "You have put down your arms! By Allah, I have not put down my arms yet." Allah's Apostle said, "Where (to go now)?" Gabriel said, "This way," pointing towards the tribe of Bani Quraiza. So Allah's Apostle went out towards them.

With around 3,000 Muslim worriers, and the Meccans out of sight (following the “Trench” events), no wonder Allah tells him to go unprovoked and take over the fortunes of Bani Qurayza. Who is there to stop him? Muhammad laid siege to Bani Qurayza for twenty five days, after which they surrendered unconditionally. They did not offer any resistance. Before they surrendered, they asked Abu Lubabah, who was doing the negotiations between them and Muhammad, since he was on friendly terms with them from previous dealings, if they should submit to Muhammad’s judgement. Abu Lubabah said yes, and gestured with his hand to his throat, telling them that Muhammad is adamant on finishing them up. Such a gesture could only mean one thing: beheading. Afterwards, Abu Lubabah felt bad that he had betrayed Muhammad, but again, he had some passion to his old Jewish friends. In history, the gesture is not disputed. What is in disputed is why Abu Lubabah felt that he betrayed Muhammad. I think the answer is simple: Abu Lubabah knew what the murderer prophet was up to.

In any case, Bani Qurayza probably felt they had no option but to surrender. Muhammad’s criminals were three thousand strong. The mighty Meccans could not take care of him and his cronies, would one tribe in Medina be able to do it on its own? Surely not! So, instead of dying fighting Muhammad, they chose to surrender in the hopes the Muhammad will take their belongings, but allow them to leave town, as he did with the previous tribes. However, this was not to be. Muhammad had become blood thirsty more and more as time passed by.

After the surrender of Bani Quaryza, Muhammad is pretty much forced to have someone other than himself to declare the judgment against Bani Qurayza. From the different books and hadiths I’ve seen, it seemed that Muhammad was adamant on killing them. He was forced, the Arab way, by Muslim leaders who had good Past with Bani Qurayza, to put someone else to declare a judgement against them. Muhammad finally agrees to name one person, Sa’d Bin Mu’ad. Muhammad does not allow the people who wanted someone else to name who the judge will be. He (Muhammad) names Sa’d and ends the discussion. One has to know, who Sa’d is, to understand why Muhammad named him. Sa’d was a born killer with very strong loyalty to Muhammad. He was mortally wounded in the battle of the trench. He was no friend to Bani Qurayza, or anyone who rejected the prophet. He would kill you or me in an instant if Muhammad just says the word. Such was Sa’d Bin Mu’ad. My suspicion is that he also knew what Muhammad desired to do with Bani Qurayza or Muhammad had instructed him on the verdict. He was very close to Muhammad. In fact history tells us that the prophet put up a tent in the mosque for Sa’d so he could personally take care of him and his (Sa’d’s) wound. As one would expect, Sa’d’s judgment was what Muhammad wanted. Here is a Hadith showing how Allah and Muhammad are working together like two sides of the same coin. Apparently, Allah loves bloody scenes of around seven hundred people being beheaded:

Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 52, Number 280:
Narrated Abu Sa'id Al-Khudri:
When the tribe of Bani Quraiza was ready to accept Sad's judgment, Allah's Apostle sent for Sad who was near to him. Sad came, riding a donkey and when he came near, Allah's Apostle said (to the Ansar), "Stand up for your leader." Then Sad came and sat beside Allah's Apostle who said to him. "These people are ready to accept your judgment." Sad said, "I give the judgment that their warriors should be killed and their children and women should be taken as prisoners." The Prophet then remarked, "O Sad! You have judged amongst them with (or similar to) the judgment of the King Allah."

Sure enough, Muhammad beheads all adult men. He took part in the beheading festivities. And, toward the evening, the Muslim Ummah men rape the poor women who had just lost all their husbands and adult male family members. Muhammad took an active role in the raping festivities. However, he had a good eye. He chose a young pretty one to rape; Rayhana. She was only fifteen years old.

What a great peaceful prophet for the Muslim Ummah to imitate!!

What would it take to Outlaw Legal Child-Sex Abuse in the Arab World?

Banning barbaric practices and violation of human rights, such as child-sex abuse, in the recalcitrant Arab world can only be enforced by external pressure upon their economic impoversihment by rendering the oil irrelevant...

---

While legal child-sex abuse in the form of ‘child marriages’ takes place in several communities, nowhere, with the exception of the Arab world, is it legal. Recently, a spate of news—and, positively, some of it from the Arab media though not from the countries that are the worst practitioners of legally sanctioned child-sex abuse, namely Saudi Arabia and Yemen—has hit the world-media, forcing some thought about this practice. The UAE-based newspaper Gulf News recently reported about a Yemeni child-bride, who was tied up and repeatedly raped by her 23-year-old husband: The girl died of bleeding.

The resultant attention found her mother crying, but she found it convenient to blame the husband for her daughter’s death, not herself and her husband for literally selling their daughter to be tortured and raped to death. Perhaps, the mother did not have a choice in the sale of her daughter; in extreme patriarchal societies women have few rights anyway. Perhaps, she did; who knows if she has other daughters who were also married off as young! Perhaps, tears and afterthought leading to regrets of this mother’s kind come only when a child’s death is the consequence of a matrimonial sale. When an institution like this has been existent for centuries and continues to be sanctioned by local laws, it cannot remain without more than a little public support.

It was another case that set off more than a little debate though: the case of a 12 year old Saudi girl who was sold into marriage cum child-sex abuse by her parents for $ 23,350 as this article describes: Fortunately, this particular girl was able to wrangle a divorce before her 80-year-old unburied carcass of a husband turned her into another grotesque object for his perversions. Commerce in young girls is an activity that closed Saudi society revels in. In 2007, another case hit the headlines when two 70-year-old business-partners married each other’s teenage daughters: The fates of these girls are not known, but, considering that they were technically on the verge of adulthood, it is hoped that they fared better.

And while a small fraction of Arab child-sex tragedies come to public attention, a vast majority of them most certainly lie buried within the closed confines of the savage social system of the Arab world. These are practices that the Arabs have not fought shy of exporting especially to poor Muslim communities in rest of the world. Several cases of young girls married off to wealthy Arab geriatrics have been exposed by the Indian media over the years. And, it is almost certain that similar cases have taken place in other poor Muslims countries, where Saudi donations fund both madrassahs and many extreme fundamentalist outfits that have proliferated especially since the end of the 1980s.

In an age when a supposedly ‘liberal’ and wildly popular American President seems to endorse everything that differs from Western social practice, considering that child-sex abuse is illegal in the West, how is the rest of the world to view this Arab practice, especially as it is supported by Arab laws themselves? In 1981, leading “Islamic” theologians of the world decided not to accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which the rest of the world had at least paid lip-service to. The Islamic word, instead, came up with what they called a ‘Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights’. The original draft has since been modified several times. As could be expected, the only reference to women’s rights is to property rights for married women. And, while some voices in Saudi Arabia have called for child-marriages to be banned and for a minimum age for marriage to be legislated, clerical opposition to this suggestion, as the link above suggests, is fierce. And, a president, who belongs to a party and a movement that has never fought shy of criticizing what it does not like in other parts of the world and of praising what it likes, has found it convenient to stay silent on this practice in a nation, one of the first that President Obama visited after taking office. Is it wrong to criticize the abuse of Saudi girls for some reason? Perhaps, someone needs to ask Obama and his colleagues this question…

More importantly, what would it take to civilize the recalcitrant barbarians, who not only practice this extreme abuse of children in their part of the world, but also actively promote it among their fellow religionists in other parts of the world using their extreme wealth as an incentive? Some countries have laws that require them to arrest and prosecute child-abusers, even if they come from overseas (Canada and some European nations have these laws), but it is doubtful if any of them would act against a Saudi national, for example, if one of them landed there and even if evidence were available of such activity. Arab wealth and Arab control of oil, a commodity that the rest of the world needs in increasing quantity under current economic circumstances, are certain to safeguard every Arab involved in these crimes beyond Arab borders. It is doubtful if Saudi Arabia will ever change these laws sanctioning marital abuse of children.

A leading Indian advertising guru pointed out to this writer that in the 1990s, when he was in Saudi Arabia, he was dragged by his Arab hosts to watch a 13 year old girl stoned to death for ‘adultery’, with jubilant mullahs handing out rocks to the assembled onlookers that came to participate in the spectacle after Friday prayers. When this is permitted by the Saudi legal system and a norm in Saudi society, what likelihood is there for marital rape and abuse being banned in that Holy Land of Islam? Until some way is devised about taking on Arab thuggery from an economic standpoint, of impoverishing them by rendering Arab oil irrelevant and worthless, millions of such tragedies will continue to take place. Hopefully, means to avoid or at least minimize the use of oil will soon send the Saudis back to their camels. An Ozymandias state of affairs to the Saudi nation ought to be desired by everyone, including the ever loquacious, until it comes to his Arab buddies President Obama if the rights and lives of abused Arab children are to be accorded any worth by the rest of the world.

Saudi thugs and their supporters are not going to become civilized except by force from external quarters that overwhelm them totally and enforce human rights from a position of economic strength.

How Muslim Women Suffer from Inhuman Islamic Law of Polygamy

Muslim women suffer horribly, mostly in silence, by Islam's easy divorce and other anti-women laws, particularly in Islamic countries. Here's a picture of how they suffer in India, and how Indian civil law (kuffar law) is trying to help them, defying Islam's sacred laws of course.

---

Whenever Muslim Scholars, clerics and apologists discuss Islamic law of oral divorce (i.e. uttering the word ‘talaq’ thrice), they, to hide the barbarity of the law and to fool the listeners, say that uttering word “talaq” thrice in a single sitting is not valid in Shariah. They try to convince that the husband should pronounce “talaq” thrice in three months. In other words, if he pronounces “talaq” for the first time in this month, he should say ‘talaq’, for the second time, after a gap of one month and he should say “talaq” for the third time after a gap of another month. But in his “Principles of Mehamedan Law”, Mohammad Hidayatullah, the first Muslim Chief Justice of the India’s Supreme Court, writes: “As soon as the husband pronounces the word “talaq” thrice, the marriage gets dissolved irrespective of time and place, and divorce becomes operative from that very moment” (Tripathy Publishers, 1980, p. 324).

Facts also support the view of Justice Hidayatullah. During Muhammad’s life, it was necessary for the husband to utter the word “talaq” thrice, and Almighty Allah could not foresee that man would discover many other means, so that the husband could communicate his message of “talaq” more comfortably to his wife and even from a faraway place. So, in the present era of technological marvels, high-tech “talaq” have become very popular. Last year, a Malaysian divorced his three wives within 10 minutes by sending SMS to them in a court room.

Perhaps, readers are aware of the nikah between Indian tennis star Sania Mirza and Pakistani cricketer Shoaib Malik that took place on April 12, 2010 in Hyderabad. Just before the nikah, the Muslim ulama issued a fatwa telling that Shoaib must divorce his existing wife Ayesha before marrying Sania. So, Shoaib had to take help of “high-tech talaq”. He picked up his cell-phone, gave a call to Ayesha and said: “Talaq, talaq, talaq”. There is no doubt that this made Sania very pleased as it cleared way for her wedding to Shoaib. But it might well happen that after a few years or even months, Sania gets a similar call from Shoaib. Incidents of “high-tech talaq” are on the rise all over the Muslim world, and the cases that come to public attention are only the tip of the iceberg. A few of such incidents may be narrated below.

Talaq over Phone

Story of Nazir Jamalooddin and Rhia Moolla

The Telegraph, a Calcutta based English daily, reported on October 31, 2006 that Nazir Jamalooddim, a Muslim of Indian origin, now residing at Durban, South Africa, divorced his wife Rhia Moolla, mother of a 4-year-old son, over telephone. But Rhia Moolla took the matter to court seeking recognition of her marriage according to South African law. She urged the court to acknowledge her nikah to businessman Nazir Jamalooddin, so that she could receive maintenance and custody of her son. Rhia and Nazir got married in 1997. Rhia alleged that Nazir refused to register their marriage under the civil laws of South Africa despite her repeated requests. She also told the court that her husband divorced her by uttering the word ‘talaq’ thrice over phone.

Story of Razia Bibi and Riyaz

Razia Bibi, a resident of Bakshika-Talab in Lucknow, was married to Riyaz, a resident of Gopalpur village in Barabanki district, UP, in May, 2000. The Asian Age, a Calcutta-based English daily, reported on February 19, 2006 that Riyaz and his family were facing severe financial constraints when the marriage took place. A few months later, Riyaz found a job in Saudi Arabia and left his young wife under the care of his family. He returned to India a year later and stayed for 6 months. During this time, Razia became pregnant.

After Riyaz went back to Saudi Arabia, his family members, particularly his uncle, began beating Razia on slightest pretext. Razia’s father, after hearing his daughter’s plight, wanted to take her back to his house for the delivery of baby. But the in-laws of Razia said that they would let her go only if Razia and her father put their signature on a blank paper. At first, they refused but due to severe torture on Razia, they yielded to their demand, and Razia came to her paternal house.

Later on, Riyaz’s uncle prepared a Talaq-nama (divorce certificate) on the signed papers and informed Razia and her father that Riyaz had divorced his wife by sending a talaq-nama. When Razia telephoned Riyaz to enquire about the matter, he confirmed his decision by uttering “talaq” thrice over phone. “I really do not know what to do with my life”, Razia told reporters. “He even refuses to accept that Asif is his son”, said Razia with tears in her eyes. She informed reporters that her husband was already preparing to marry another woman.

Talaq by Telegram

The Calcutta edition The Times of India, a renowned English daily, reported on May 11, 2007 that a Muslim man, named Mohammad Tazim Khan Lone from Ghaziabad, UP, had divorced his wife Abida Khatun by sending a telegram. In the telegram, the word “talaq” was written thrice. At that time, Abida was staying at her father’s house in Delhi. The telegram also said that Abida could collect alimony amount, dowry items and iddut from Tazim Khan Lone. But Abida refused to accept the divorce and decided to take the case to court.

Talaq by Courier

The Ananda Bazar Patrika, a Calcutta-based Bengali daily, reported on November 19, 2006 that a Muslim, named Yasin, from Punjab was in hurry to marry another women. He took a paper, wrote the word “talaq” thrice on it, and sent that to his wife Zahida Parvin through a courier. On the next day, he married another woman without caring for whether his message of talaq reached his wife. But his wife refused to admit the divorce, and reported the matter to Darul Ulum Deoband. The mufti of the Darul Ulum also refused to admit the divorce, and issued a fatwa declaring the talaq illegal and unlawful. Muslim Personal Law Board also expressed a similar view, and declared the second marriage of Yasin unlawful. Though police did not take any action, Zahida expressed her determination to take the matter to court.

The story of Ishaq and Rabia

The November 23, 2006 edition of The Times of India reported that in Jodhpur, Rajasthan, Husband Ishaq divorced his wife Rabia, and a few days later on October 1, 2006, he quietly left home. This forced Rabia and her two children to beg on the street. But thanks to the newly constituted Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, Rabia filed a case against her husband and on 22^nd November, 2006, the Additional Civil Judge and the Judicial Magistrate Harivallabh Khatri of the Jodhpur court issued an interim order that asked Ishaq to pay maintenance to Rabia, ignoring the protest of Ishaq that paying maintenance was against the Shariah law. The court also asked Ishaq to give money to Rabia for education of their son and daughter.

It should also be noticed here that the said Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 empowers an Indian magistrate to take quick decision and issue interim orders pending final disposal of the case. But Ishaq’s lawyer opposed the claims of Rabia, saying that since she had already been divorced as per Muslim law, and she was not entitled get maintenance from her ex-husband.

The story of Bilkis Begum

A three-day seminar on "Condition of the Muslim Women in West Bengal" was held from 17 to 19 December, 2008 in Kolkata. Many oppressed Muslim women came from various districts to attend the seminar and to tell their stories. In that seminar, they freely exchanged their views and discussed their sufferings. The story of Bilkis Begum was one of them. She came from the district of Murshidabad, a Muslim dominated (70%) district of West Bengal. It should be mentioned here that, though the Sachar Committee Report mentioned the pathetic condition of the divorced and deserted Muslim women, the state governments are keeping a blind eye to this problem according to their policy of Muslim appeasement, and this renders the NGOs working for women’s rights and welfare aggrieved.

The tragedy of Bilkis Begum is that, neither her husband served talaq to her, and nor he admits her in his house. By driving her out of his house, her husband has married another woman. Bilkis is now satying at her paternal house along with her two-and-half-year-old son. Her father and other relatives are pushing her to marry another man, but she is not mentally prepared for it. Her brothers are threatening her to drive her out. In that case, where she would go? As her husband has not divorced her, she is unable to file a case against her husband asking for maintenance. Even if her husband pronounces ‘talaq’, it is uncertain whether her claim for alimony would stand, as Shariah Law has no provision for maintenance for a divorced woman. (Courtesy The Silent Terror by R N Datta)

The Story of Jyotsna Bibi and Nasima Bibi

Jyotsna Bibi is a resident of the village Bharkata in the district of Birbhum, West Bengal. She is also facing a similar problem. Her husband has brought a new wife and driven Jyotsna out of his house without a talaq. She is now living in her father’s house with her two sons, where where she faces ill-treatment as her brothers find her and her sons as an extra burden.

Similar is the case with Nasima Bibi, a resident of the village Dayanagar of the Bhgabangola area in the district of Murshidabad. For the past 9 years, she is living in her father’s house with her 11-year-old daughter. She has filed a case in court against her husband demanding maintenance. Her father and brothers are putting pressure on her to marry again, but she has decided to continue the legal battle and see the outcome of the case first.

While commenting on the above incidents, Khadija Banu, a social activist fighting for women’s rights, says that Bilkis, Jyotsna, Nasima and many other women like them are fighting an uneven battle. Bilkis is thinking of filing a case for alimony, if her husband serves her a divorce. Many other women like Nasima are fighting for maintenance. But it is uncertain how far they will be successful, as Shariah law has no provision for alimony.

“It is nearly impossible to realize maintenance, even if a ceremonial talaq is served”, says Khadija Banu.

“The district of Murshidabad is a Muslim dominated and nearly 70 per cent of its inhabitants are Muslims and there over 300,000 Muslim women in this district alone, who are deserted and riven out by their husbands without a divorce. In addition to that, there are more than 100,000 victims who have received talaq. What will happen to this large number of destitute women?” asks Khadija. (Courtesy The Silent Terror by R N Datta)

“Triple Talaq” not Enough”, says Bombay High Court

According to a report appeared in The Times of India, Calcutta, on January 21, 2007, a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court ruled that ‘talaq, talaq, talaq’, these three words were not enough for a Muslim man to divorce his wife. In that crucial judgment, which rekindled the ‘triple talaq’ controversy, Justice B H Mariapalle, while delivering his verdict on a divorce case between Dilshad Begum and her husband Ahmadkhan Hanifkhan Pathan, observed that the talaq between Dilshad Begum and Ahmadkhan Hanifkhan Pathan was not valid as the husband had not gone through the preconditions of arbitration and reconciliation prescribed by the Muslim law. “The reasons for divorce, appointment of arbiters, the arbiters resorting to conciliation proceedings and failure of such proceedings or a situation where it was impossible for the marriage to continue, have not been proved in this case,” said the judge, reiterating the landmark judgment delivered by a full Bench of the Bombay High Court in similar circumstances in 2001.

At that time in 2001, a full Bench had held that “Mere pronouncement of talaq by the husband or merely declaring his intentions or his act of having pronounced the talaq is not sufficient and does not meet the requirement of law.”

On Islamic protocol of divorce, the Koran says:

“Ye may divorce your wives twice; and then either retain them with humanity or dismiss them with kindness ….” (2:229).

“But if the husband divorces her a third time, she shall not be lawful for him, until she marries another husband. But if he also divorces her, it shall be no crime in them if they return to each other again, if they think they can observe the ordinance of Allah” (2:230).

And under the Muslim law, a man can divorce his wife at will by talaq (release from marriage), or ila (taking a vow of abstinence), or zihar (declaring his wife to be his mother). A marriage can also be dissolved by judicial decree under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act.

For Dilshad Begum, it was a 16-year-long legal battle for getting justice. According to her husband Pathan, in 1994, he pronounced ‘talaq’ three times in a mosque and produced two witnesses to testify his case. He added that a talaq-nama along with an advocate’s notice and mehr (money paid by the groom to his wife at the time of marriage) of Rs. 125 and maintenance amount during the iddat (three menstrual cycles from the pronouncement of the talaq) Rs 600 were sent to his wife by money order. But the court, however, ruled that merely conveying his intention to divorce was just a part of the legal requirement, as stated above.

From above discussions, it becomes clear that the Indian judiciary is reluctant to admit the barbaric and inhuman Islamic law of divorce and the Indian judges, within the provisions of civil (kuffar) law, are trying their best to give some relief to divorced and deserted Muslim women. But it should be noted that, in nearly 99% of cases, these destitute and mostly illiterate women are financially incapable to take their cases to civil court, and hence cannot avail the benefit of law.

Echoes of Jew-Hatred of the 1930s on the Streets of Malmö

And, thanks to the burgeoning population of Muslims and their fascistic leftist bedfellows... A truly grim picture of what is coming to the West...

---

[Translated from the Swedish by Bruce Bawer and first appeared in Human Rights Service Webiste.]

Philip Wendahl has studied human rights and theology & is currently writing a book about multiculturalism and Islam.

Last year in Malmö, the number of hate crimes against Jews quadrupled in comparison with the preceding year. The grim figures are especially surprising given that, as is usual with hate crimes, many victims do not dare to report them out of fear that doing so might bring on further harassment. As the same time that this is happening, the city’s leading politician, Social Democrat Ilmar Reepalu, maintains that there have been no attacks on Jews and that if Jews wish to leave Malmö for Israel it is not the city’s concern.

One is tempted to pinch oneself in the arm in hopes of waking up from all this. The situation I am describing is that of Sweden in the year 2010, yet the odor of 1930s Germany lingers in Reepalu’s words: there have been no attacks on Jews.

That the harassment of Malmö’s Jews is principally the work of Muslims is a source of bewilderment for Swedish politics, which is fixated on, first, ethnicizing conflicts and then assuming the perspective of the victimized minority. At best, the anti-racist groups blind themselves to the current reality, and at worst they choose instead to take on the alleged enemy known as Islamophobia.

That there is Muslim anti-Semitism in our country should not surprise anyone – not even the sleepy Social Democrats – but Reepalu’s words give it a tacit approval, and for this reason Swedish politicians share the blame for these atrocities which are an offense against individuals as well as aganst our civilized society.

Malmö’s politicians should stand up for the Jewish minority whose numbers are lower than those of the Muslim street terrorists and should defend them. There are about 1500 Jews in Malmö and (one hopes) an equal number of friends of Israel. There are hundreds of thousands of people in Malmö with Muslim or Arabic backgrounds.

The Swedish state, too, in its dealings with those who come from homophobic, anti-Semitic, misogynistic, and anti-democratic countries around the world, should consider it an imperative to stress our nation’s democratic and humanistic values.

We must stop being ashamed of our openness and stop apologizing for our values. And the Swedish nation must abandon the legalistic multicultural ideology that all cultures are always equal and equally admirable.

Multiethnicity without regard to people’s skin color, sexual orientation, gender, or gender expression is a cornerstone of democracy, but values should not be relative.

Even “secular” Muslims, after all, come from countries where the regimes are brutal toward Christians and Jews; to expect that these views will magically be left behind when these people cross the nation’s borders is naïve and dangerous.

But while the streets fall into the hands of the strong, Malmö’s own strong man not only turns a blind eye to the anti-Semitism that is washing over the world, but spurs it on.

When Israeli tennis players were welcomed to Malmö for a friendly Davis Cup match between our two countries’ teams, Reepalu felt palpable unease being in the same room as these Jews. Asked a few years ago who was the world’s worst living individual, Reepalu answered Ariel Sharon.

Of course there is good reason to criticize Sharon – but if I had been asked the same question, such names as Putin, Saddam Hussein (who was alive at the time), Fidel Castro, Omar Al-Bashir, or (why not?) Hu Jintao would have seemed more appropriate, given the thousands of murders, expulsions, rapes, and assaults of which all these men were guilty. Reepalu’s answer fleshes out our picture of him.

When the Jewish community arranged a peace demonstration in the town square, participants scattered when left-wing groups, together with Islamist groups armed with glass bottles, eggs, rockets, and Hamas flags, ran them off. The response from Malmö’s city hall? None.

And when the Jewish funeral chapel was vandalized? Nothing.

And when burkas marked with the words “Zyklon B” were placed at the Jewish cemetery? Not a word.

And when the synagogue in Helsingborg was set on fire – and when Jewish merchants were harassed? Utter silence.

A dense odor of the 1930s hangs over the streets of Malmö.

Muhammad in the Gospel of John?

On the basis of a mention in Ibn Hesham’s Sira, a redacted version of Ibn Ishaq’s Biography of Muhammad, Muslims claim that Muhammad is foretold in the Bible. This article investigates this claim.

(For this analysis, I rely on Hesham’s Sira, ‘The Prophet’s Biography of Ibn Hesham’, translated by Mohammad Mahdi al-Shariff, published in Lebanon by Dar Al-kotob Al-Ilmiyah in 2006, 2nd edition. Page numbers references used refer to this edition of the book.)

Muhammad foretold in the gospel of John

On page 39 of Sirat Ibn Hesham, Ibn Ishaq is claimed to have said that Muhammad had been found in the gospel of John:

…but, when the Moonhamena (The Syriac citation form of the Arabic Mohammad and the Latin Barkalitus) comes to existence as sent from God, he will be a witness on me and you... (p. 39)

This claim is parroted and expanded by ‘Answering Christianity’ Team:

In the Bible, we can find the following four passages wherein Jesus (peace be upon him) predicts a great event:

"And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever." [John 14:16]

"But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, [even] the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me." [John 15:26]

"But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." [John 14:26]

"Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: Of sin, because they believe not on me; Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more; Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged. I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, [that] shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew [it] unto you." [John 16:7-14]

In these four verses, the word "comforter" is translated from the word "Paraclete" ("Ho Parakletos" in Greek). Parakletos in Greek is interpreted as "an advocate", one who pleads the cause of another, one who councils or advises another from deep concern for the other's welfare (Beacon Bible commentary volume VII, p.168). In these verses, we are told that once Jesus (peace be upon him) departs, a Paraclete will come. He will glorify Jesus (peace be upon him), and he will guide mankind into all truth. This "Paraclete" is identified in John 14:26 as the Holy Ghost.

Now, when I read the gospel of John, and the reader is invited to read it, I see no prophecy about Muhammad. In addition, the above claims are mere lies. Below, I provide quotes from the ‘Answering Islam’ team to show that the above claims are bogus:

Since a quick reading of the Gospel does not reveal such a prophecy in any obvious form, a more detailed search has continued over the years; and many Muslims now claim that Jesus' promise of the Counselor or Paraclete in John 14 is that very prophecy. Professor Katkat claims this in an article on the subject in Manr Al-Islm, and Yusuf Ali expresses the same idea in the following note on Sura 61:6, "Ahmad" or "Muhammad", the Praised one, is almost a translation of the Greek word periclytos. In John 14:16, 15:26 and 16:7, the word "Comforter" in the English version is for the Greek word "Paracletos" ...Our doctors contend that Paracletos is a corrupt reading for Periclytos, and that in the original saying of Jesus there was a prophecy of our holy Prophet Ahmad by name.

The first thing to be understood is that in Greek, unlike in Arabic, the vowels are written into the text. Thus to change from pErIclYtos to pArAclEtos would require the alteration of three written letters.

Secondly, there is absolutely no textual evidence for such a reading. Not one copy of the Gospel of John, from the oldest Greek copy dating 200 AD until now, shows periclytos in place of paracletos. Photograph 7 of Papyrus p75 from 200 AD shows John 14:9-26a. The last word on the page clearly shows "PARACLETOS" from verse 26. Verse 16 has been partly destroyed, but in the middle of the line marked by the two arrows one can still see "PARACL - N" for paracleton ("ON" signifies a direct object). In the first case, the whole word is visible and in the second, two of the three letters under discussion can be clearly seen.

Thirdly, although periclytos, meaning famous or renowned, was used by Homer when he wrote Iliad and Odyssey in the classical Greek of the 10th century B.C., there is not one instance where this word, or any of the other members of its word group, are used in the Koine Greek of the New Testament or the Septuagint translation of the Old Testament.

Thus there is neither textual nor linguistic support for "periclytos".

For a more thorough analysis of this matter, the reader is advised to go to ‘Answering Islam’ Website. The claim that Muhammad was mentioned in the Bible is a mirage. Christians, who understand their holy book better than tendentious Muslim scholars, certainly don’t go around claiming, nor do they agree to the Muslim claim, that Muhammad, that desert thief, is foretold in their book.

Muslims' Final Abode: Paradise or Allah's Whore-House

To get his followers fight in suicidal raids and wars, Muhammad created an image of Islamic paradise, where Muslims will find unlimited access to every earthly desires, greed, pleasures and wealth that man may wish to have or experience in this life. Sexuality, perverse sexuality---including group-sex with numerous eternal virgins and sodomy with pearl-like boys---for men (not for women) are among the staples in Allah's paradise. Muhammad knew what would work best to inspire young men fight deadly wars and used that tool to his advantage...

---

“By waging war against this country, we have secured a place in Jannat (heavenly paradise).” -- Mufti Abu Bashir, Mastermind of the Ahmedabad Blasts in India.

For Muslims, the temptations offered in the Islamic Paradise are really too good to the extent that they would die for it. It is a powerful motivational factor, driving the cause of the Islamic Jihads the world over. In committing terrorist activities, such as by becoming suicide-bombers to kill the infidels (kafirs), the followers of Islam buy their one-way tickets to the Islam’s sensual Jannat.

So, let us see what this Jannat is all about. The idea of the Islamic Paradise (al-Jannah) was invented by the Prophet of Islam, Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa (SAW), to bribe the Pagan Arabs into committing hideous crimes by promising them materialistic things in the afterlife---things which they couldn’t ever obtain in the harsh Arabian Desert! This heavenly abode contains six important items:

1) beautiful virgins,

2) young pearly boys,

3) pure water,

4) rivers of wine,

5) delicious fruits, and

6) unending wealth, royal livings.

Apparently some of the X-rated benefits are (sorry no such benefits for Muslim women):

1. 72 Virgins (eternally young and who never menstruate and “all will have appetizing vaginas”)
2. Permanent Erection (Muslim men’s Penises never goes soft in the Islamic Paradise)
3. Endless homosexual pleasure (with handsome boys of perpetual freshness)

Read the details: The Muslim heaven is instead a Disneyland of sensuality or, as one can describe it as the X-rated Paradise of Islam. Unlike on the earth, in this heavenly abode “sin” no longer exists. Virtually any sensual pleasures desired by those blessed Muslims are enough to gain admittance here, is permitted and provided all…

We have heard vaguely of the “72 virgins” or Houris, promised as dedicated sex-slaves to each Muslim man in Paradise in addition to his wives from earth. This, in the sayings of the Prophet, is “the smallest reward” someone can expect in Islam’s paradise. (see The Tafsir of Quran 55:72; Book of Sunan, Vol. IV, Chapter 21, Hadith 2687). These black-eyed beauties will be true virgins, ever violated “by man or jinn” (genie). And, miraculously, each of the millions of times a Muslim man in Paradise copulates with them, they will be again virgin. They will remain eternally youthful and fresh. Moreover – and here young and sensitive readers are warned to stop reading – as Ibn Warraq quotes the renowned Koranic commentator Al-Suyuti (d. 1505) in The Guardian, in Paradise:

“The penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you have sex is utterly delicious and out of this world, and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [i.e., Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas.”

A 16-year-old Hamas youth leader in a Gaza refugee camp told USA Today last June: “I know my life is poor compared to Europe or America, but I have something awaiting me that makes all my suffering worthwhile…Most boys can’t stop thinking about these virgins.”

And for variety, Islamic Paradise offers more than endless heterosexual pleasure. The martyrs there will also spend eternity serviced by handsome “boys of perpetual freshness: if thou seest them, thou wouldst think them scattered pearls” (Koran 76:19) or “young boys…as fair as virgin pearls” (Koran 52:24).

Even on earth, Allah readily forgives men who repent after engaging in homosexual acts (Koran 4:21). From a dusty, poor refugee camp in Gaza, the suicide bomber as he explodes his vest will instantly be transported to this Islamic Paradise. This is why many Palestinian suicide bombers behave as grooms preparing for their wedding to “the dark-eyed ones”, and why one young bomber was found to have wrapped his genitals to keep them intact for the exotic heavenly thrills and pleasures awaiting him. source

The most comprehensive resource on the X-rated Paradise of Islam with verses from the Koran is described in this article. To prove these points, these sacred verses are taken from the Koran and quotes from Hadiths.

VIRGINS (HOURIS)

Prophet Muhammad knew that sex would sell very well among the group of his lecherous followers and he bribed and motivated them to fight his battles by the promise of sex-slaves and war booty on earth. By constantly emphasizing to his followers that they would get untouched virgins in Paradise, Muhammad is clearly expressing his "high" opinion of the institution of marriage and his fairness to women. Once the followers go to heaven, they can conveniently ditch their wives for the fresher and more pleasurable sexual encounters with the 'Houris' (beautiful virgins). Not only that, the poor wives who gave up their virginity for the pleasure of their husbands do not get even one Male Sex partner. But wait, Allah is the all merciful! He gives the wives the rare honour of watching their husbands deflower those 72 Houris (virgins) one by one and also the 28 young pre-pubescent pearly boys.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

Koran 78:31

…As for the righteous, they shall surely triumph. Theirs shall be gardens and vineyards, and high-bosomed virgins for companions: a truly overflowing cup.

Koran 37:40-48

...They will sit with bashful, dark-eyed virgins, as chaste as the sheltered eggs of ostriches.

Koran 44:51-55

...Yes and we shall wed them to dark-eyed houris (beautiful virgins.)

Koran 52:17-20

...They shall recline on couches ranged in rows. To dark-eyed houris (virgins) we shall wed them...

Koran 55:56-57

…In them will be bashful virgins neither man nor Jinn will have touched before. Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?"

Koran 55:57-58

…Virgins as fair as corals and rubies. Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?"

Koran 56:7-40

...We created the houris (the beautiful women) and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand”

Koran 55:70-77

…In each there shall be virgins chaste and fair... Dark eyed virgins sheltered in their tents whom neither man nor Jin will have touched before.

In the Hadiths, Prophet Muhammad goes one step further and expands the promise of the paradise virgins to include a free sex market where there is no limit of the number of sexual partners. Women and young boys are on display as if in a fruit market where you can choose the desired ripeness.

Quote from Hadiths

Al Hadis, Vol. 4, p. 172, No. 34

…Ali reported that the Apostle of Allah said, "There is in Paradise a market wherein there will be no buying or selling, but will consist of men and women. When a man desires a beauty, he will have intercourse with them."

YOUNG PEARLY BOYS

Despite outwardly condemnation or disapproval, homosexuality was and is widely practiced in Islamic countries. To please the homosexuals among his followers, Prophet Muhammad promised them pre-pubescent pear-like boys in Paradise. So after committing plunder, loot, rape and murder in this life, the followers of Islam will get "rewarded" by untouched virginal youths, who are fresh like pearls.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

Koran 52:24

…Round about them will serve, to them, boys (handsome) as pearls well-guarded.

Koran 56:17

…Round about them will serve boys of perpetual freshness.

Koran 76:19

…And round about them will serve boys of perpetual freshness: if thou seest them, thou wouldst think them scattered pearls.

Also, famous poets in Arabia glorified homosexuality. A poem in 'Perfumed Garden' by Abu Nuwas:

O the joy of sodomy!

So now be sodomites, you Arabs.

Turn not away from it therein is wondrous pleasure.

Take some coy lad with kiss curls twisting on his temple

And ride as he stands like some gazelle standing to her mate.

A lad whom all can see girt with sword and belt not like your whore who has to go veiled.

Make for smooth-faced boys and do your very best to mount them,

for women are the mounts of the devils

PURE WATER

One of the major problems in the harsh deserts of Arabia was shortage of pure water. Muhammad knew very well that to the Arabians, fresh water was an item of luxury. So, by promising them abundant pure water, river, fountains and springs in paradise would definitely lure them to murder, loot and plunder people of other religions in this life.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

Koran 13:35

…This is the paradise which the righteous have been promised: it is watered by running streams.

Koran 3:198

…As for those that fear their Lord, theirs shall be gardens watered by running streams in which they will abide for ever, and a goodly welcome from God.

Koran 3:136

...These shall be rewarded with forgiveness from their Lord and with gardens watered by running streams, where they shall dwell forever. Blessed is the reward of those who do good works.

Koran 15:45

The righteous (will be) amid gardens and fountains (of clear flowing water)

Koran 22:23

…As for those who have faith and who do good work, God will admit them to gardens watered by running streams.

Koran 47:15

…Here is a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised: In it are rivers of water incorruptible.

Koran 55:50-51

…In them each will be two springs flowing free; then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

Koran 55:66-67

…In them will be Two Springs pouring forth water in continuous abundance: Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

Koran 44:51-55

…As for the righteous, they shall be lodged in peace together amidst gardens and fountains.

Koran 56:7-40

...They shall recline on couches raised on high in the shade of thorn less Lote trees and talhs; amidst gushing water.

RIVERS OF WINE

Prophet Muhammad had to find more selling points besides virgins, young pearly boys and plenty of water. What good would be of Paradise without rivers of wine for his followers too? Wine was an extremely precious commodity in the dry deserts of Arabia, where it was rare to find vineyards. Muhammad had a problem here, he had to include wine in his 'Paradise-Package', but how could he include it in the list when Allah had declared intoxicants as sinful. The only way to do this was to somehow claim that the wine in the promised Paradise was not intoxicating and therefore not sinful! Never mind the fact that wine by nature contains alcohol which is intoxicating.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

Koran 47:15

…Here is a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised. In it are...rivers of wine.

Koran 37:40-48

…But the true servants of God shall be well provided for,...they shall be served with goblet filled at a gushing fountain, white and delicious to those who drink it. It will neither dull their senses nor befuddle them.

Koran 56:7-40

…They shall recline on jeweled couches face to face, and there shalt wait on them immortal youths with bowls and ewers and a cup of purest wine.

Koran 83:23-26

…The righteous will surely dwell in bliss. Reclining upon soft couches they will gaze around them: and in their faces you shall mark the glow of joy. They shall be given a pure wine to drink, securely sealed, whose very dregs are musk.

DELICIOUS FRUITS

So far Prophet Muhammad has presented a very appetizing picture of Paradise, but then it struck him that sex is no fun on an empty stomach. Besides that one needs lots of nutrition in order to have the energy to perform with so many Houris and young boys. The prophet was an expert on such matters, as having honoured every one of his numerous wives and mistresses with a nightly visitation on one single night. Besides, the only fruits he had ever gotten to taste in this life were some dates and dry pomegranates. So, heaven had to be furbished with an inexhaustible supply of every variety of fruits.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

Koran 13:35

…This is the paradise which the righteous have been promised… eternal are its fruits, and eternal are its shades.

Koran 37:40-48

…But the true servants of God shall be well provided for, festing on fruit and honoured in the gardens of delight.

Koran 43:68-73

...Such will be the garden of which ye are made heirs for your deeds. Ye shall have therein abundance of fruit, from which ye shall have satisfaction.

Koran 47:15

…Here is a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised: ...In it are rivers of milk of which the taste never changes; rivers of wine, a joy to those who drink; and rivers of honey pure and clear. In it there are for them all kinds of fruits; And grace from their Lord.

Koran 55:47-49

…Containing all kinds of trees and delights. Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

Koran 55:52-53

…In them there will be fruits of every kind, two and two. Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

Koran 55:54-55

...The fruit of the gardens will be near and easy to reach. Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

Koran 55:68-69

…In them will be Fruits, and dates and pomegranates: Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

Koran 44:51-55

...Secure against all ills, they shall call for every kind of fruit.

Koran 56:7-40

…They shall recline on jeweled couches face to face, and there shalt wait on them immortal youths with ...fruits of their own choices and flesh of fowls that they relish.

Koran 76:13-21

...Reclining there upon soft couches, they shall feel neither the scorching heat nor the biting cold. Trees will spread their shade around them, and fruits will hang in clusters over them.

But the best was yet to come. The highlight of life in Islamic Paradise is the fact that, one doesn't have to go to the toilet. All merciful Allah had miraculously provides a much better system for getting rid of body waste. You simple sweat it out (probably after all that sex or belch after consuming all that fruit and wine).

Quote from the Hadiths:

Sahih Muslim Book 39, Number 6798, Narrated Jabir ibn Abdullah:

“I heard Allah's Apostle (pbuh) as saying that the inmates of Paradise would eat and drink but would neither spit, nor pass water, nor void excrement, nor suffer catarrh. It was said: Then, what would happen with food? Thereupon he said: They would belch and sweat (and it would be over with their food), and their sweat would be that of musk and they would glorify and praise Allah as easily as you breathe."

UNENDING WEALTH

Prophet Muhammad wanted to ensure that his followers would not be obsessed with 'worldly things' in this life! So, he made sure that they have plenty of worldly things to pursue in heaven.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

Koran 22:23

…As for those who have faith and who do good work, God will admit them to gardens watered by running streams. They shall be decked with pearls and bracelets of gold, and arrayed in garments of silk.

Koran 43:68-73

..Enter ye the Garden, Ye and your wives, in beauty and rejoicing. To them will be passed round, dishes and goblets of gold: there will be there all that soul could desire, all that the eyes could delight in: and ye shall abide there in.

Koran 55:70-77

...They shall recline on green cushions and fine carpets. Then which of the favours of your Lord will you deny?

Koran 44:51-55

…As for the righteous, they shall be lodged in peace together amidst gardens and fountains, arrayed in rich silks and fine brocade.

Koran 55:54-55

…They will recline on carpets, whose inner linings will be of rich brocade.

Koran 56:7-40

…They shall recline on jeweled couches.

Koran 76:13-21

...They shall be arrayed in garments of fine green silk and rich brocade, and adorned with bracelets of silver.

Muhammad's promise of an Islamic Paradise, glittered with the fulfillment of all sorts of worldly desires and sensual enjoyments, was nothing but a sinister ploy to recruit those, who had no hope or expectation of ever getting these things in their worldly life. Knowing that they are assured of such a Paradise, simply because they follow Islam, Muslims can go around committing murder, rape, plunder and loot, or any other criminal things. It is the picture of this paradise that has motivated Muslims over the centuries to cut down people of other religions, to desecrate their places of worship and mistreat them in the name of Allah. Even after death, the spiritually deprived Prophet of Islam could not see beyond wine, women and food, leave alone exploring spiritual heights of the soul!

Iran, Islam & Cyrus the Great

The current Islamic regime under the mullahs has shown, on countless occasions, its contempt both in words and deeds for the memory of the founding father of Persia, Cyrus the Great, including flooding the plain which houses the King’s tomb, destroying the archeological sites of Pasargad and Persepolis, and harassing and intimidating those who would gather at the tomb of the enlightened king to commemorate the International Day of Cyrus the Great.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is staffed by devout Islamists that are determined to wipe out all traces of the pre-Islamic era. They aim to surpass every heinous crime committed for the past 1400 years by the Mohammedan followers. What is enshrined in the Cyrus Cylinder is unconditional respect for the complete rights of all the people of the world, an anathema to the Islamists' credo.

I have come to the realization that it is not possible for a person to be a Muslim and live by the standards that the great king enunciated some 2500 years ago. Tolerating evil is not tolerance, it is a crime. That's why Cyrus the Great clearly proclaimed that he would punish any official in his empire who did violate anyone's human rights anywhere in his empire.

An illustration of the benevolent beliefs and practices launched by this unsurpassed historical figure goes back to the landmark action of King Cyrus the Great of Persia. The father of the human rights charter freed the "enslaved" Jews in Babylon and helped them go to their homeland, lead a peaceful life and worship their God without harming others or forcing them to become Zoroastrian. I learned from the Great King how to be human and honor human rights. That's what I have learned from the enlightened king and that is why I honor the great trailblazer of our ancient Iran. Human rights do not come with our birth certificates. People must defend this sacred right. And in my own humble way, that's exactly what I am doing. I hold Islam in violation of the sacred charter of Cyrus the Great by invading other lands, enslaving people, destroying their heritage and their way of life.

I find Islam guilty of pursuing a multi-front attack, even to this day, on much of what is sacred to all civilized people. I consider Islam responsible for 1400 years of atrocities committed against my people. The litany of Islam's wrong-doings is beyond the scope of this writing. Just look around you in the world and see the horrific things that true Muslims are doing, not only to the people they label infidel, but to their own various sects, under the misogynist, discriminatory banner of their belief.

Shamelessness, dissimulation, and all forms of deceptions and distortions seem be infused in true Muslims. Some, the brave few, manage to get a transfusion and replace the toxins in their systems. Most just plod along and don't get all that concerned with the intricate issues of their religion, a sort of superficial affiliation that serves them in a complex way. Yet, others go the distance. These latter types do anything and say anything to keep the toxin intact in themselves and transmitting it to the next generation and all the people that they can infuse. That's my take.

Millions of Iranians consider the mullahs, their lackeys and lobbyists as true enemies of Iran, the country of my birth. Let’s be clear, Iranians have never asked for charity from anybody, but all they are saying is that people and countries that are at clear risk from the mullahs ought to step to the plate and help the Iranians, in numerous effective ways to get rid of these usurpers, these religious fanatics who are hell-bent on promoting their deadly agenda. The Iranian people will assuredly dislodge these wolves and try them for their crimes with all due process, the due process that they have completely denied for the people of Iran for 31 years. But, tried they will be and we need help from our friends to destroy the common enemy before it escalates its bloodletting program, both in Iran and against Israel and eventually engulfing the entire world.

Iranians are dismayed by President Obama's intent to make deals with these leaches and they would like to see the American people dissuade him from giving these murderers legitimacy. We do understand that self-interest is the motivating force for the individual and groups as well as nations. Thus, it is understandable that President Obama is taking serious steps to further America’s interest by negotiating with Iran’s Mullahs in the hope of stopping them from building nuclear weapons. This is an admirable objective. However, a number of troubling issues immediately come to mind.

For one, stopping the Mullahs from their pursuit of making the bomb is an unlikely possibility. It is an ineluctable fate. That achievement treats a symptom rather than eliminates the virulent disease of Shi’a’ Islamism. The best strategy that stands the greatest chance of success and entails the least risk of starting a cataclysmic chain reaction is for a “coalition of the willing,” to borrow a phrase, to rally behind the Iranian people.

President Obama is not a dictatorial leader like Iran's so-called supreme leader Ali Khamenei. President Obama is elected by the people and he stands accountable to the people. Every American concerned about the well-being and security of the country should embark on a tireless campaign of convincing President Obama that a deal he aims to make with the illegitimate rulers of Iran is not worth the paper it will be written on.

It is, at best, appeasement to make any deals with the sworn enemy of the United States of America. How clearly and how often do the mullahs have to proclaim their irreconcilable and irreversible hostility toward the U.S. and Israel? These mullahs believe their own delusions of grandeur. They think that they can win their brinkmanship and they do firmly believe that they will outsmart America, rest of the world and will have their way. In the process, they are more than willing to do whatever services their objective, by any and all devious means. Dealing with the mullahs brings to mind the "peace in our time" that Chamberlin brought to England by his deal-making with the Fuhrer. Except that this time the stakes can be much higher and deadlier.

With respect to Israel, I have always said that the Israelis shouldn't be trigger happy. If the hawks in Israel succeed in convincing the government to attack Iran's facilities, it would be an answered prayer for the mullahs. My advice: Don't do it. Don't even think of doing it. Use all your power and influence to get the U.S. and its allies to move with serious extensive, crippling and immediate sanctions, in conjunction with counterrevolution, even if the duplicitous Russians and the conniving Chinese refuse to sign up in the effort. The slap-on-the-wrist type of sanctions is almost as bad as a military attack. It would give the mullahs more time to pursue their dream weapon.

We have invaluable allies on the ground in Iran. There are some 50 million Iranians who are the best hope of the world in that part of the world. These enlightened Iranians despise the Mullahs

and have no animosity toward Israel or the United States. Most of these people are well-educated and smart and have broken away from the slavery and fraud of Islamism. They are in the best position to send the Mullahs packing for good. Instead of throwing a lifeline to the sinking ship of the Mullacracy, we must act resolutely in doing everything non-violent to help them defeat the Mullahs. It is our best bet.

As I see things now, the house -- the world -- is being set on fire by the hordes of front-line jihadists and millions of Muslims, in one form or another, are forced to support these front-liners. The masses of Muslims are just as guilty as the front-liners. Without their support, much of it monetary, there won't be enough jihadists to worry about. Keep in mind that money is the lifeblood of any movement. And the Islamist nations, sheiks and others have their treasuries filled to the rim with mindless and apathetic people like us who burn their oil and give them our money. These individuals and governments feel that it is their religious duty to channel much of this money to do the work of Allah and establish the pipe-dream of Caliphate in the world.

Presumably, we all agree that there are some fires in the house, but many appeasers don't want me to cry at the top of my voice that it is a raging fire. They say that I might frighten the sleepers. Well, let me do that. It is better that I frighten and even insult people than they burn in the ever-escalating inferno. Islam is indeed a deadly social retrovirus. Telling people to take two aspirin and not worry about it is not the kind of medicine the world needs today.

The Islamdom is at a crossroad. Millions in Iran, a hugely important force of sustaining and fanning the Islamic fire, have already turned and are turning against Islam. They and the rest of the world need to hear the voices of secular decent people who are in league with them. I am sure you want to play your part in this honorable endeavor and lend your help to put Islam, the very spawning swamp of the deadly virus that makes for jihadists, out of business.