I looked, and behold, an ashen horse; and he who sat on it had the name Death; and Hell was following with him. Authority was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword and with famine and with pestilence and by the wild beasts of the earth. Revelation 6:8
Sila Sahin, a Turkish Muslim actress, has posed for the Playboy Magazine. She says it was her protest against the suppression she suffered under Islamic culture and an act of complete liberation from those constraints.
She has been duly branded a "whore" and "western slut" and quickly received threats for insulting Muslim womanhood.
Read more here: Fanatics' fury at Muslim Playgirl
Allah works like a deadly virus to the people it infects and there is finally hope for a lasting cure to it...
[Acknowledgement: The central theme of this article is taken from Darrel W. Ray's book The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture]
There are thousands of examples in popular science fictions of invading aliens taking over the mind and bodies of humans to further their own end. For example: Robert Heinlein's famous novel, The Puppet Masters and the movie by the same title (1994) directed by Stuart Orme, and also another movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) based on a novel The Body Snatchers by Jack Finney (Kay, 2008, p. 330). These two heart-pounding horror films often leave the audience wondering: where did science fiction get the idea?
But fiction such as these need not be stranger than truth. In the biology of pathogens, parasites and viruses, there are many examples of such infections. Certain parasites can literally take over critical mechanism of the host cells by reprogramming it the best interest of the parasite and to the determent of the host (Alford & Hill, 2000, p. 82).
In like manner, Muslim brains are infected by the deadly Allah virus. Parasitic viruses reprogram the host so as to replicate the virus. Similar, the Allah virus activates some programs in Muslims for its replication. Certain behaviors are programmed to ensure that the Allah virus is passed onto others specially their children (such programming is common to all religious cults, but not necessarily as deadly as in Islam today).
The prime infection strategy of the Allah virus, i.e. Islamization of the Muslim mind, starts from the birth and continues throughout his/her life. It is the most extensive brainwashing process a human can ever be subjected to. After birth, an adult holds the newborn and recites the azan (the call for prayers) directly into ears of the baby. This way, the newborn hears the blessed names of Allah and Muhammad before he hears anything else. As the child grows up, he reads and hears more about the Qur’an. He sees people performing prayers and walls are decorated with posters of Arabic calligraphy of some Qur’anic verses. He also hears the azan repeated five times a day in every mosque in the area. The call for prayers soon becomes the most frequently heard sound by him. His ears soon get used to hearing the endless recitations of the Qur’an that go on almost continuously.
If the child goes to Madrassah (Islamic school), further indoctrination continues. The fear of Allah, the hatred of Allah toward infidels, Muslims are best of people (Q: 3.110) and unbelievers are vilest of created beings (Q: 98.6), Paradise and Hell-fire etc. are systematically programmed into him. This is coupled with illogical thoughts and twisted logic to make the child to believe that Muhammad is the best man Allah ever created, or will ever create to the end of time and Allah (like the Big Brother) is watching every Muslim and he should behave strictly according to Allah’s will. The fear factor starts working and soon the innocent mind of the child gets the message that there is something very special about the Qur’an, which he is destined to read hundreds of times without ever understanding it and, except Allah no other God to be worshipped.
Once fully indoctrinated, the child fails in his ‘reality test’ – the ability to distinguish the actual from the imagined. Neither he can confront the truth nor can he admit it even to himself. His sick mind fervently believes in Allah’s mercy, power, hell, paradise etc. Slowly, Islam becomes his drug and Allah becomes his addiction. Without Islam, it is a world of black and white. With Islam it is a colorful show complete with drama, thrills, fun and excitement. Now he is in the mental prison of Allah. He simply cannot dare to cross the narrow limits specified by Allah. Now he can see things only through the lenses of Islam. This continues throughout his life.
A parasitic virus creates antibodies or strong defenses against other viruses (Sompayrac, 2002, p. 14). When Allah virus infects a person (a “host” in biological terms), it immediately begins creating “antibodies” against other competing religions. Any verbal denial of any principle of the Muslim belief is considered apostasy. Muslim nations have enacted laws to stop the conversion of Muslims to other religions. Allah instructed,
“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good)” (Q: 3.85)
“The Religion before Allah is Islam (submission to His Will)” (Q: 3.19).
“Whosoever disbelieves in Allah after believing except he who is forced while his heart remains in his belief but he who opens his chest for disbelief, shall receive the Anger of Allah and for such awaits a mighty punishment” (Q: 16.106).
“… take them (apostates) and kill them wherever you find them. Do not take them for guides or helpers” (Q: 4.89).
“Say: ‘Flight will not avail you (apostates), if you flee from death or slaughter, you would enjoy (this world) only for a little (time)’.” (Q: 33.15, 16)
The Allah virus ensures that Muslims get absolute immunity from other religions. In a society, where people of different race, color and religion live together, it is ever more important. Since the Allah virus cannot control the Muslims from coming in contact in their day-to-day life, it takes preventive measures to keep Muslims blind and unreceptive to other human beings. Allah has isolated Muslims from the rest of humanity by dividing the Humankind into two perpetually hostile groups Dar al-Islam (the house of Islam), and Dar al-harb (the house of war), i.e., Muslims and Kafirs, and has implanted the concept of jihad or permanent war in the Muslim mind. Deprived of contact with others and starved for human interactions, Muslims bond with their predator. The more helpless a Muslim is; the more is he dependant on the Allah virus.
The Allah virus specifically targets the brain, causing abnormalities in mental functions of the individual, but it remains undetectable by the victim. When a healthy human being is infected by the Allah virus, his attitude towards others and worldview changes dramatically. He, willingly and submissively, self-denigrates to become a partner of Arab imperialism.
This tendency has a devastating affect on the national character of the non-Arab Muslims. When a non-Arab person accepts Islam, he is forced to love Arabia and its traditions at the expense of the culture, honor and pride of his own motherland. Mecca is now more favorite than his birthplace, Arabic more than his mother tongue and the Arab heroes more than the heroes of his nation. Since Allah hates the infidels, a non-Arab Muslim must hate the infidel peoples of even his ancestral origins. Some viruses take over the machinery of the cell for its own purposes and kill it (The world book encyclopedia, 2005, p. 335). In Egypt, the glorious land of ancient Pharaohs; the people don’t call themselves Egyptians any more. All of them had become Arabs. Naipaul (1998, p. 1) wrote,
“Islam is not simply a matter of conscience or private belief. It makes imperial demands. A convert’s worldview alters. His holy places are in Arab lands. His sacred language is Arabic. His idea of history alters. He rejects his own: he becomes, whether he likes it or not, a part of the Arab story. The convert has to turn away from everything that is his. The disturbance for societies is immense, and even after a thousand years can remain unsolved. The turning away has to be done again and again. People develop fantasies about who and what they are.”
In sum, the Allah virus grooms the Muslim minds in such a way that they become lifelong slaves of Arabs. They can’t apply minimum logic and reason to discover the true nature of Islam. Their definitions of ‘good’ and ‘bad’, ‘right’ and ‘wrong’, and ‘logical’ and ‘illogical’ are reversed. A Muslim can spend his entire life studying the Qur’an, Ahadith and Muhammad’s biography, but he will never detect a single error in the Qur’an (despite its abundance), though he will easily find similar errors in other scriptures. He will never notice that Muhammad was a criminal, a liar, a pedophile, a shameless womanizer, a mass murderer and a ruthless tyrant, though minor character-flaws of some Catholic Priests and their sex-scandals will never go unnoticed to them. Even if the contradictions of the Qur’an or Muhammad’s flawed character is pointed out, his reprogrammed crippled mind will try to camouflage them. All the contradictions and errors will appear as clear proofs of its divinity. They will ‘sincerely’ deceive themselves into believing that non-Muslims either know that Islam is truth and reject is out of pure unreasonableness or else are simply ignorant of it. As Ray (2009, p. 25) commented,
“Once infected, the individual cannot detect major contradiction in his beliefs and behavior. Belief systems become self-evident to him and no amount of logical discourse will move him from his belief.”
When the parasitic Allah virus takes over some functions of the Muslim mind, it modifies them like aliens snatch the bodies of the victims by controlling their minds. This is the time Muslims fail the "reality test". From the very bottom of their heart, they know that hatred towards a fellow human being is wrong, but still they have to ‘sincerely’ hate the nonbelievers because Allah wants them to hate. Today Jews and Christians are the most advanced people in the world in every field and Muslims are at the bottom. But they have to ‘sincerely’ believe that monkeys and pigs are descendent of Jews and Christians because Allah wants them to believe so. The Pakistani, Afghan, Bangladeshi and Indian Muslims immensely hate their Hindu counterparts. They understand very well that their forefathers were forced to accept Islam by the sword and deception. Every subcontinent Muslim is descendant of their Hindu ancestors. Still, they will have to ‘sincerely’ hate the Hindus, because it pleases Allah. Today, such self-contradictions are much less prevalent in others religion.
The parasitic viruses use specific methods for spreading the virus. In biology, pathogens use specific vehicles, called "vector", for infection. Mosquitoes, for example, act as a vector for malarial parasites. The Imams, Mullahs, Moulavis, Ulemas and Islamic preachers (e.g. Zakir Naik) act as the vector for the Allah virus that causes the Islam disease. The Clerics infuse the Allah virus into normal human beings and reprogram them to become Muslim and the effective careers of the Allah virus. The Arabs and other Islamic nations spend billions to help the parasitic Allah virus survive and propagate through Jihadi terrorism or holy war in the name of Allah. To ensure its own survival, Allah instructed,
“Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” (Q: 9. 41)
“Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” (Q: 9. 20)
“O ye who believe! Shall I show you a commerce that will save you from a painful doom? Ye should believe in Allah and His messenger, and should strive for the cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives. That is better for you, if ye did but know.” (Q: 61.10,11).
“The (true) believers are only those who . . . strive with their wealth and their lives for the cause of Allah.” (Q: 49.15)
“… Pay the zakat. Those saved from covetousness prosper. If you loan to Allah a beautiful loan, He will double it. He will grant Forgiveness: for Allah is most ready to appreciate” (Q: 64.16).
Some vectors can actually be more efficient when dead. Just as the rabies virus takes over the brain of the raccoon and reprograms it to bite other animals – even at the cost of its own life – the Allah virus directs few programmed Muslims to go on suicide mission to propagate the cause of Allah. No doubt, a suicide is the ultimate act which ends the person, but when a bomber kills himself in the name of Allah, Allah’s religion gets a powerful tool for propagation. Sometimes the vectors fail. Today we can see that many hardcore Islamic terrorists and radical Imams have left Islam.
Islam is a painful mental disease. When the Allah virus infects a person, most of the mental functions -- logic, reason, study, learning and critical thinking, creative imagination etc. -- are disabled. Therefore, despite having a fully functioning brain, Muslims cannot prosper. The Allah virus originated from Mecca and it keeps the infected persons focused on Mecca through rituals and actions that reinforce their faith on a daily basis.
Biological viruses mutate. When Allah virus mutates, Islam divides into different sects – Sunni, Shia, Sufi etc. While many such mutations work to the interest of the virus, occasionally some mutations go out of control and turn fatal for its survival. Such mutations lead to the emergence of ex-Muslims and freethinkers of Islam, in whom the Allah virus have become totally nonfunctional.
Fatal mutations also give clues and hopes to victims, namely humans in the case of Allah virus, for a cure of the virus. So when Jihadi Muslims, those infected with the most virulent strain of the Allah virus, are busy in shedding the blood of innocent people all over the world, these ex-Muslims are offering humanity rays of hope. These ex-Muslims are not only completely cured of the Islam diseases, but also have grown complete resistance against the Allah virus. Their fully re-activated brains also understand the working of how Allah virus works. When one knows the working mechanism of a virus, he/she can offer solution to the diseases it causes. And many ex-Muslims are doing exactly that by attacking the core of virus through websites, blogs, media and books.
Today, the Allah virus is under threat from many sides. The ex-Muslim and freethinking websites are not only immunizing potential victims to infection by it, but are also awakening Muslims to fight back the killer virus residing inside them. Advancement and new developments in medical technology is critical to develop cure to age-old deadly diseases. In the case of Allah virus, recent developments in communication technology, particularly satellite television and the Internet, which are reaching the remotest harems of Islamic nations, are offering such technological advancements to facilitate the remedy of the Allah virus by offering profoundly altered mental climate to Muslim people.
Another threat of Allah virus is the continual march of science. Yet another threat is the Psychology. Many psychologists can clearly see what Islam does to Muslims; how it destroys healthy relationships and families, forces people into self-defeating beliefs and generates unjustified hatred.
Religion is a major contributor to mental illness. But Islam, by itself, is an edifice of mental illness. Like the deadly smallpox virus was eradicated in the 1970s, the Allah virus, humanity’s worst scourge, must be completely eliminated from the earth. Otherwise, the new deadly strains it has developed will easily take us back to Stone Age. And all the signs at this hour point to a victory for humanity in this lasting battle.
References
1. Alford, Diane and Hill, Jennifer (2008); Excel HSC biology, Pascal Press, Sydney.
2. Kay, Glenn (2008); Zombie Movies: The Ultimate Guide. Chicago Review Press. USA.
3. Naipaul, V. S (1998); Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions Among the Converted People, Abacus. London.
4. Ray, Darrel W. (2009): The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture. IPC Press, Bonner Springs, Kansas.
5. Sompayrac, Lauren (2002); How pathogenic viruses work. Jones and Barelett Publishers. Sudbury. USA.
6. The world book encyclopedia (2005), Volume 5, World Book, Inc.
Why confront Islamism? Because if we don’t it will continue to get more extreme. This is not Islamophobia, as many Muslims and their apologists protest. A phobia is a baseless irrational fear. Detestation of Islamism, the violent form of Islam, is based on irrefutable facts and it is not only rational, it is ethically imperative.
 |
It is a virtue to take action to oppose the hateful, vice to ignore it. It is a virtue to hate tyranny, misogyny, discriminations of all sorts, oppression, and all manners of violations of the legitimate rights of the individual and peoples.
Islamism is a mutation of Islam into a terrible menace. It is religious fascism, a destroyer of liberty and much of what free people cherish. Therefore, it must be confronted.
Islamism, Islamofascism, radical Islam and political Islam, are different terms for essentially the same thing: a virulent, hateful, and violent system of beliefs and practices. Yet, one and all are progeny of Islam itself. It is a systemic problem of Islam that inevitably gives rise to Islamism. The three scriptures of Islam, the Quran, Islam’s holy book; the Hadith, sayings of Muhammad as recorded by his contemporaries; and the Suna, the life examples of Muhammad himself, together form the body of Islamic beliefs. They provide an array of frequently confusing, multiple-meaning and even outright contradictory dogma that enable anyone to pick and choose certain teachings of Islam and justify anything they do on the basis of the scripture.
The Quran enjoys a sanctified standing, since Muslims believe it is written by Allah himself. Allah handed down the Quran to Archangel Gabriel, chapter by chapter, to deliver to Muhammad over the course of some 22 years. Muhammad could neither read nor write. So Gabriel had to whisper the chapters to him and Muhammad in turn would reveal them to any literate person who happened to be around to write them down on anything he could find. To Muslims, every word of the Quran is a literal perfect immutable eternal word of Allah himself. Therefore, no man or divine is ever to revise, much less dispute, the Quran.
The hodgepodge of Islamic scripture is the medium for generating all kinds of mutations, some of which such as Islamism are extremely dangerous. A segment of any society, at any time, is staffed by people who feel disaffected, alienated, and disenfranchised. It is from the ranks of this population that Islamists heavily recruit.
Islamism’s rallying cry is also of particular attraction to the young since it is rabidly anti-establishment. The young lack a major stake in society but brim with action-inclined vitality. They are among the most willing recruits to anti-establishment causes. Older leaders frequently take advantage of the young’s proclivity to act and enlist them as foot-soldiers in their cause. The Hitler’s youth, the Soviet Union’s young Communists, and the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Bassij (young Islamic storm troopers) are some examples of the young’s enlistment by tyrannical systems.
Furthermore, there is excitement in action, any action. The greater the risk, the greater is the excitement and this feature is highly attractive to a significant segment of the population. That’s why it is said that war is exciting, while peace is boring. The validation of this dictum is seen daily, for instance, in numberless arenas where battles rage between combatants, be they cocks, dogs, or human. Throngs of spectators pay by time and money to participate vicariously in the socially-approved brutalities.
In any physical contest, the more violent side usually prevails. The Islamists use ruthless force to eliminate the opposition or to intimidate them to join its ranks.
Islamism is rapidly advancing on two fronts. In every Islamic country, it is cowing the non-radicals while recruiting more and more radicals into its own ranks. In non-Muslim lands, flush with Petrodollars, Islamism is establishing itself as a formidable force by enlisting the disaffected and attracting the delusional liberals with its promises. For the faithful, there is the added incentive of Allah’s heaven and its irresistible attractions.
There are those who claim that the majority of Muslims in the world are moderate and non-violent. It may be so. Yet, the silence of this majority is deafening, although, they do speak up from time-to-time by, for instance, claiming that the 9/11 slaughter was the work of the Jews, even when Osama himself proudly admits the dastardly act.
This very same Muslim majority pours into the streets of the West on a moment’s notice to protest against the slightest perceived affront to its sanctities, but they never march to condemn the violent acts of the Islamists- or speak up against them. This sort of majority behavior makes it complicit with the Islamists.
In spite of all this, Islam’s apologists and lobbyists want us to accept the notion that the present Islamic radicalism is an aberration that given time will dissipate as have all radical movements of the past. These folk fail to tell us about the radical movements that inflicted horrors on humanity before they expired. Here are a few instances of the bloody acts of radicalism from Wikipedia:
Also, Iraq’s socio-fascist Baathist government slaughtered several hundred thousand Kurds and Shiites during Saddam Hussein’s reign of terror. And let us not forget the genocidal mullahs presently ruling Iran. These Islamofascists executed, without the least due process, tens of thousands of the opposition in order to consolidate their Islamist tyranny. The mullahs’ present project is the subjugation of the region and, down the road, the world itself.
Islamism (Islam) threatens to set a new record for brutality, contrary to the contention that there is no reason to worry about it. Jihadist Wahabism’s tentacles are reaching out from its cradle in Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf Arab Emirates. The Petrodollar flush Sunni zealots are liberally financing mosques, madresehs (Islamic indoctrination schools), Islamic centers at universities, front organizations and lobbyists to promote the Wahhabi virulent Islamism in every part of the world.
Murderous Shiism, led by Iran’s racing to arm itself with the ultimate weapon, is busily doing whatever it can to ensnare the world into Islam’s nation, the Ummah. The purported peaceful Muslim majorities are nowhere to be seen. They are either complicit with the Islamists or on the retreat from Southeast Asia to the Americas, from Australia, to Europe.
Islamism is a pincers, with the world in its jaws between the end-of-the-world Shiism and the jihadist Sunnis. The two jaws aim to crush the life of all non-believers. It is imperative that people who value liberty rise up and act to defeat Islamism. Here are some specific suggestions:
It is urgent that we confront Islamism. All free people, Muslim or not, must demand that their governments, at all levels, abandon the practice of political correctness and act to safeguard liberty against the truly deadly assault of Islamism on the rest of the World.
See the video in this link: Three gays socked in petrol and thrown into a burning inferno: http://zandiq.com/video/0000000047.shtml
Dutch MP Geert Wilders is going to release his second movie, FITNA II, depicting the "real life" of Muhammad, which may spell the death of Islam.
In my previous article, it has been pointed out that the advent of the Internet has become a serious threat to the survival of Islam. Through internet, it has been easy to unmask the true face of Islam and its originator Muhammad. It has enabled critics to overcome the taboo of telling the truth about Islam and Muhammad… Islam stands on the projection of Muhammad as a perfect, sinless human being, but as his real vile character becomes exposed through the Internet, the foundation of Islam becomes increasing weak on its way to collapse. That's why Islamic countries try to block many Websites that expose the true face Islam and its founder.
I have many Muslims students. I have been astonished to know that these so-called educated Muslims know nothing about Muhammad's real deeds. They don’t know that Muhammad, at the age of 52, married Ayesha when she was a child of six. The clerics and the mullahs craftily guard this and other such nasty truths about Muhammad from today's Muslims, including his marrying the wife of his adopted son Zeid, massacring the Jews of Beni Kouraiza and Beni Nadir en masse etc. So, projection of the real life and deeds of Muhammad will undoubtedly play havoc upon the creed of Islam.
In his recent article The Passion of the Vampire-Prophet, the author Sujit Das writes,
“Often a question arises in our mind, why the Muslim clerics are reluctant to make a movie on Prophet Muhammad to promote Islam?.... The answer is simple. Islam is a barbaric religion which is completely devoid of spirituality. There is only deception, hate, murder, bloodshed, rape, delusion, terrorism, crime, suicide-bombing, honor-killing etc…etc. …In spite of this, if a film is produced on Muhammad’s honest biography, it will be a horror movie – a vampire movie that is set in background of extreme lawlessness of seventh century Arabia and Prophet Muhammad being the vampire itself.”
The Wikipedia gives a list of 15 movies made on Muhammad and Islam. [2] Out of these, 3 are based solely on the life and deeds of Muhammad. These are[3]:
(1) The Life of The Last Prophet (This Islamic historical movie was labeled as one of the greatest movies about Muhammad ever made.)
(2) Muhammad: The Last Prophet (An animated historical film about the rise of the Islamic religion), and,
(3) Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet (A documentary that explains the life of Muhammad from birth to death and his contributions to the cultures of the time.)
These films have, undoubtedly, presented a sugar-coated Muhammad by concealing his lustful, cruel and demonic deeds. Had any of these films projected the true color of Muhammad, Muslims across the world have demonstrated violent protests, as they are now protesting over the incident of burning a Koran by an American Pastor in Florida.
How the shameless Muslim authors try to project Muhammad as a great humanitarian? For example, Tariq Ramadan, professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford University, believes that the life of human prophet Mohammed can teach us many lessons. In his book In the Footsteps of the Prophet: Lessons from the Life of Muhammad (2007), he depicts Muhammad as a deeply spiritual man with a great respect and love for women. According to him, Muhammad, was not without faults. But he was tolerant to other faiths. “And unlike his followers, he allowed Muslims to abandon their religion, and personally permitted an Abyssinian Muslim to convert to Christianity”, says Mr. Ramadan.
Geert Wilders to make a Film on Muhammad
 Geert Wilders |
Geert Wilders, the Dutch MP, Chairman of the Dutch Freedom Party and the creator of the revolutionary short film FITNA, explained in a recent article Time to Unmask Muhammad [5] the urgent necessity of disclosing the true face of Prophet Muhammad. And in pursuit of that, he announced on April 1, 2011 that he would be making FITNA-II in 2012 about “the barbaric life of the sick mind of Muhammad”. Sixty-five percent of Freedom Party voters said they approved of the proposed FITNA sequel.
On April 2, the RNW News Desk published an article, Wilders’ Mohammed: rapist killer or compassionate activist?, authored by Klaas den Tek and Myrtille van Bommel. “A barbarian, a mass murderer - that’s how Dutch MP Geert Wilders says he will portray the prophet Mohammed in a new film. Hirsi Ali sees him as depraved, the Pope as tyrannical. Others think of him as elusive or an invention, and some consider him a tolerant philosopher or a human rights activist. Six views to assess Wilders’ claims about Mohammed”, the authors say.
“The cruel leader of a band of plundering, murderous, rapist robbers from Medina” - that’s how Dutch MP Wilders says he wants to depict the prophet in his new film, due in 2012 as a sequel to his 2008 anti-Qur’an short FITNA. To support his view Wilders cites a biography of the prophet written by Flemish psychologist Herman Somers: “The sources describe orgies of savagery in which hundreds of people were strangled, their hands and feet chopped off, eyes pricked out and entire tribes exterminated.” Wilders says he wants to “unmask” Mohammed; so Muslims can turn their backs on Islam.
In September 2006, Pope Benedict XVI compared Mohammed with a contemporary jihadist. During a lecture at a German university the Pope quoted a 14th-century Byzantine emperor as saying: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” His comment triggered a spurt of violent protest by angry Muslims around the world. The Pontiff eventually apologized and declared that he had no intention to insult anyone but had meant to start a frank dialogue.
“By Western standards Mohammed is a perverse tyrant,” said former Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born ex-Muslim, in an interview in 2003. “If you don’t do what he says, you come to a bad end,” she added.
“Mohammed says a woman should stay indoors, wear a veil, is not allowed to do certain work and should be stoned if she commits adultery,” she said of the prophet’s “posthumous blackmail”, as Muslim societies seek to implement those commands.
Conclusion
Given Geert Wilders is a student of the true history of Muhammad, his upcoming film, FITNA II, will portray Muhammad "real life" that would include his hatred towards non-Muslims, his bloody massacre of Jews and Arab infidels, his infinite lust and sexual perversity, his pedophilia and all other demonic deeds without any sugar-coating. A film on the true life of Muhammad, as wished by Sujit Das, is undoubtedly on its way. The world may well be waiting for a "Vampire Movie", based not on an imaginary creature, but on the life of a real human person, whom the world's 1.5 billion Muslims consider the greatest ever human being in history. And it will, no doubt, serve as the most devastating blow yet to the vicious Arabian creed, namely Islam.
References:
(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_about_Muhammad
(3) http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/genres-movies/drama/10-islamic-historical-movies/
(5) http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/op-ed/time-to-unmask-muhammad-an-article-by-geert-wilders/
Jones burned the Koran, he says, because it inspires violence against non-Muslims. Muslim fanatics turned around and proved his point by committing koranically inspired violence against non-Muslims.
 |
Sometimes the obvious needs to be stated, especially when there is so much at stake. In this case, what is at stake are not only human lives but also the very heart of individual freedom. Because of violent reactions from many in the Muslim world, American politicians are seriously considering enacting anti-Constitutional restrictions on free speech, a shocking treachery that plays right into the hands of fascists.
"Here's the obvious: Jones burned the Koran, he says, because it inspires violence against non-Muslims. Muslim fanatics turned around and proved his point by committing koranically inspired violence against non-Muslims."
I refer, of course, specifically to the fracas wherein Christian fundamentalist preacher Terry Jones "tried," "convicted" and then burned a copy of the Muslim holy book, the Koran, with the typical violent response from thousands of rabid Muslims rampaging and murdering. Here's the obvious: Jones burned the Koran, he says, because it inspires violence against non-Muslims. Muslim fanatics turned around and proved his point by committing koranically inspired violence against non-Muslims.
Frantic fingerpointing
Naturally, instead of the blame for the murders and mayhem being laid at the feet of the killers, Jones is being assailed for the carnage, as if burning a book is comparable to murdering human beings!
"Saudi Arabia and other Muslim areas burn hundreds to thousands of Korans every year... Saudi forces are alleged to have burned a Koran in Bahrain just this past week."
It should be noted that Saudi Arabia and other Muslim areas burn hundreds to thousands of Korans every year, in order to dispose of them. Saudi forces are even alleged to have burned a Koran in Bahrain just this past week, while destroying a mosque there. Did Afghans and others go out and slaughter Saudis because of this act of desecration? No, because the Afghan president didn't get them all riled up, like he did with the infidel Terry Jones. Why not blame Hamid Karzai, then, for the savage behavior of his constituents?
Eroding freedoms
It's obviously not the burning that's the problem but the criticism; it's the pointing out that the Koran and Islam are violent which sadly elicits this violence. The restrictions on our speech and expressions will not cease with a ban on burning the Koran; we will be further compelled not to "insult" Islam, Mohammed and the Koran in any way, shape or form, including telling the truth. We will then simply be dhimmis or second-class citizens in a global Islamic caliphate under sharia law. That's how it works.
"We simply cannot allow our freedom of speech and expression to be destroyed."
So what do our politicians do? They capitulate to this egregious assault on our freedoms, forcing us into cowed dhimmitude and proving that violence and terrorism pay, so long as they are part of a religion. We simply cannot allow our freedom of speech and expression to be destroyed - these civilized liberties and human rights are what distinguish us from savagery and tyranny.
Houston, we've got a problem - and it's been around a lot longer than Terry Jones. And it's going to get a whole lot worse if we keep appeasing and allowing that thin edge to wedge itself any further. Time for the world to wake up!
Who is to blame?
Someone once told me about another person burning my first book, The Christ Conspiracy. Although I take my work very seriously, I laughed when I heard that. I did not go on a violent rampage, slaughtering dozens of innocent people. If I had, would the person who burned my book be to blame in any way?
"Saudis and other Muslims regularly burn, spit on, urinate on or otherwise desecrate Bibles."
Moreover, the Saudis and other Muslims regularly burn, spit on, urinate on or otherwise desecrate Bibles - do these acts cause Christians to rampage through the streets and national governments to condemn the instigators? Are these desecrators of non-Muslim holy texts being hauled off, having their freedom of expression removed - a religious right, in their eyes?
We are constantly reminded not to blame Islam for the bad behavior of countless Muslims, so why are Muslims excused for murdering people whose only "crime" is being a non-Muslim in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Are Muslims being held to a different - lower - standard? To be coddled like violent sociopathic children or treated like subhuman animals who just can't control themselves? Isn't that a more derogatory perspective of Muslims than is criticizing their "holy text," full of hatred and calls to violence against non-Muslims?
In deflecting the blame off the killers and restricting non-Muslim freedoms, Islamist fanatics will simply learn that violence pays, like schoolyard bullies who are never dealt with. This sort of censorial cowardice could be considered negotiating with terrorists!
Muslim-on-Muslim crimes against humanity
 |
And where is the outrage against "Islamically sanctioned" carnage perpetrated by Muslims against other Muslims? Like the victims of this latest uproar, are the Muslim Bengalis, as one infamous example, to blame somehow for provoking their own genocide, which has been forgotten by the world? Are hundreds of thousands of murders and rapes of Bengalis unworthy of outrage, while a book is to be protected by all means, including slaughter as well as tyrannical restrictions of freedom? The very book used to justify these atrocities?
Bengali Muslim: Genocide and rape 'Islamically sanctioned'
Kasem: Born in Bangladesh, I attended the secular schools as well as underwent strict religious discipline, and digested religious preaching.... When I was nine, a typical Mulla taught me the Islamic rituals (like prayer, ablution, fasting), and how to recite the Qur’an correctly. He also taught us that Muslims are the only inheritors of the earth, that we must never mix with the non-Muslims, we must hate them, humiliate them verbally, and if possible, physically.
In high school, I discovered a world beyond Islam. I met a few Hindus and two Christians. I found them extremely polite, peace-loving, sincere, and affable. Unfortunately, communal riots broke out in India and Bangladesh (then known as East Pakistan ). One of my Hindu friends was brutally murdered by Islamist fanatics. This was a life-changing experience, as I witnessed the mutilated dead bodies of my friend, his parents, and siblings. When I discussed this with a few Muslim gentlemen (moderate Muslims) they told me that the Hindus deserved to be killed; there should not be any Hindus in our Muslim land. Further, I learned from them that in Islam, there is a great reward for killing the non-Muslims.
"A local Imam took out a Qur'an, read a few verses, and told me the genocide and mass-rape was a hundred percent Islamic-sanctioned."
In a few years our struggle for autonomy took the shape of a Liberation Movement, seeking freedom from economic and political domination of West Pakistan, which was a strict Islamic country. In 1971 the Islamic Army of Pakistan let loose a genocide, killing around 3 million Bengalis, and raping around 250,000 Bengali women. Local Islamists helped their barbarity in every way. They justified their actions by Qur’an, ahadith, and Sharia laws. After independence, I talked about it with a local Imam. He took out a Qur’an, read a few verses, and told me the genocide and mass-rape was a hundred percent Islamic-sanctioned. He said the Bengali Muslims have deviated widely from the real Islam, and as such, they deserve Allah’s punishment, and the Pakistani army did just that to purify us. Shocked, I decided to read the theological sources of Islam.
What I discovered horrified me. It was beyond my comprehension that a religion, touted to be the religion of peace could contain such blood-curdling, terrifying, barbaric verses, cultures, and laws to entice the entire Islamic community to slaughter the infidels and the not-so-good Muslims....
There is much, much more at that must-read article, including lists of the numerous koranic verses and hadiths used over the centuries to justify violence to the tune of some 270 million dead. Is it really difficult to understand why someone would object to such a book?
| | |
Further Reading
Bangladesh genocide and rape forgotten
Bangladesh Genocide Archive
Christians in Gaza Fear for Their Lives as Muslims Burn Bibles and Destroy Crosses
Pastor Terry Jones burned a copy of the Quran, charging it of promoting violence and terrorism against non-Muslims. And Muslims in Afghanistan reacted in real peaceful manner, quite fitting with the "religion of peace".
Florida Pastor Terry Jones has burned just one little book of Koran and all hell broke among the Muslims in Afghanistan. Afghan Talebans (pure Muslims) showed the world their crazy monkey dance of how peaceful Islam is by chanting "Death to America". In two day’s of Islamic savagery, they killed at least 20 innocent humans (none of them responsible for the Koran burning). They even killed their own kind, out of the jihadi zeal they learned from their sacred books, the Koran and Sunnah (traditions of the Prophet of Islam). Islam survived 1400 years by this kind of threats and savagery. Of course, this time the world was some what fortunate that same jihadi monkey dances were not seen elsewhere in the Arab nations, because they are now busy with their own despotic rulers. Readers can see how much intolerant Muslims are and the degree of their monkey dance in these two videos below:
Click here: http://www.usatoday.com/video/index.htm?bctid=876687643001&csp=taboola
Also here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/koran-burning-sparks-un-massacre/2011/04/02/AFNaxzNC_video.html
In early 2001, right before 9/11, during those good-old days of Islamic Caliphate of Afghanistan, it was the same Taleban Muslims (sub-humans), who gleefully destroyed two-thousand years old Giant Statue of Buddha (Lord of Buddhists) at Bamyan in Afghanistan and there was not a single angry street-protest from the followers of Buddhism. Instead, some Buddhists Monks in Burma and Thailand prayed to Lord Buddha for the forgiveness of those jihadi Talebans. In Egypt, Nigeria, Somalia and many other Islamic nations—churches and temples are destroyed and Bible and Ghita are burnt almost routinely, but world never witnessed any monkey dance from any Christians or Hindus.
How Pastor Jones burned Koran and why?
Florida Pastor Terry Jones considered Koran guilty of violence and hatreds against humanity. He held a self-styled mock trial of the holy book in which he presided from the pulpit as judge. The prosecutor was a Christian who had converted from Islam. Sitting in judgment was a jury of 12 members of Mr. Jones’s church. After listening to evidences and arguments from both sides, the jury pronounced the Koran guilty of five crimes against humanity. And those are:
(1) Promotion of fighting and terrorist acts worldwide against innocent non-Muslims
(2) asking followers to kill people who does not believe in Islam
(3) Encouraging rape and torture slave women and concubines
(4) encouraging hatreds against non-muslims and
(5) promoting to force-conversion to Islam and bring all humans under the fold of Islamic Caliphate by armed Jihad.
Punishment was determined by the results of an online poll. Koran was sentenced to death. Besides burning, the options included shredding, drowning and facing a firing squad. Mr. Jones, an evangelical pastor, announced that voters had chosen to set fire to the Koran, according to a video of the proceedings. This was how Pastor Terry Jones and his Church members burned a copy of the Koran into ashes. Please click to this Video link of Mock trial by Pastor Terry Jones and Koran burning:
Myth of Koran can not be burned is exposed!
There is a well-known myth amongst Muslims that Koran can not be burned, because Koran is the word of Allah and fire is afraid of consuming Allah’s words. Gullible Muslims and mullahs strongly believe this as a fact. They even fearful that if anybody tries to burn the Koran, then his own hands will be burned or paralyzed instead, and holy Koran will remain intact. There are stories in the Muslim world that when whole house was burned to ashes, the only thing that survived was a copy of Koran, which remained unharmed. Why? Because the Koran is the divine tablet from Allah.
Why not jihadi Muslims burn the Bible when Christians burn the Koran?
 Indonesian Muslims hold a banner during a protest against the US-led military attack on Libya in Jakarta, Indonesia, Friday, April 1, 2011. |
Muslims can practice ‘tit for tat’ instead of killing innocent people. They can burn 10 or even 100 Bibles for one copy of the Koran to extinguish their Jihadi zeal. Why kill innocent humans? Islamists are reluctant to burn the Bible, probably because they know very well that Christians will just ignore at their Bible-burning hysteria at best. Hence, jihadi Muslims find it meaningless to burn the Bible. They have to surpass all limits in their vengeance. Truly, they are followers of the "religion of peace"!
Now something good for the honorable readers. One picture is worth a thousands Blogs:
Where are those inter-faith jokers and where are those so-called moderate Muslims, or where are the hypocrites of CAIR, ISNA, ICNA, MAS, MSA, etc? Could any of the above-mentioned moderate jokers fiercely rebuke and denounce these Muslims as viciously as they denounce counter jihad fighters? I wonder!
A relatively recent demographic change—significant increase in Muslim population—poses a serious challenge to the American system of governance—democracy.
Historically, people from all over the world came to this land-of-take-all and made it their home. In becoming American, each new aspirant had to meet specific provisions and take the “Pledge of Allegiance” as sworn affirmation of his highest loyalty to his new homeland. After a couple of generations, all hyphenated Americans saw themselves as Americans with a special affection for their ancestral heritage. An Irish-American, for instance, considered himself every bit as American as a German-American, or a Chinese-American.
Traditionally, America did not homogenize its diverse people. The notion of the “melting pot,” is inaccurate. Instead, America did one better. As it welcomed its diverse people, America united them around a set of core values such as respect for human rights, democratic governance, and the rule of law. The large number of Muslims arrival of recent years is posing a serious problem to this nation of all nations. Bluntly speaking, no one can be a faithful Muslim and an American at the same time. Here are some of the reasons.
A Muslim is, first and foremost, an Ummahist—a citizen of international Islam. So, when a Muslim takes the Pledge of Allegiance, he is either ignorant of the implication of his pledge or is lying willfully. Ignorance is never a valid reason in the court of law, and lying in the process of becoming a citizen is a ground for denying the application and even deporting the violator. Sadly enough, tagyyeh (taqiyya) —lying, or dissimulation—is not only condoned, it is recommended to the Muslims in their scripture. Hence, a Muslim can and would lie without any compunctions, whenever it is expedient.
Muslims, by belief and practice, are the most blatant violators of human rights. We hardly need to detail here Muslims’ systemic cruel treatment of the unbelievers, women of all persuasions, and any and all minorities across the board. To Muslims, human rights have a different meaning, and its protective provisions are reserved strictly for Muslims—primarily for Muslim men. Just a couple of examples should suffice for now.
Oppression of women, for one, is so systemic in Islam that to this day women are, at best, second class citizens under Islamic law. Saudi Arabia, the custodian of Islamdom, denies women the right to drive, vote or hold elective offices—the most basic rights of citizens in democratic societies.
For another, no non-Islamic literature is allowed in Saudi Arabia. A visiting Christian, for instance, is denied to enter the Kingdom with a Bible. Further, severe punishment is meted out to anyone daring to disagree with Islam or espouse a different religion. Iran’s resurgent Shiism often vies with Saudi Arabia in its mistreatment of religious and non-religious minorities. To the fanatical ruling gang in Iran, it is their brand of Islam or disenfranchisement of rights of citizenship and even death for the “sin” of apostasy. And of course, there is no point at all in talking about the savage Islamic Taliban.
Respect for the rule of law, as it is understood and practiced by civilized people, is an instrument of convenience to be used to advantage and to be violated when it is not, for the Muslim. A Muslim believes in a different law—the Shariah: a set of stone-age rules. Violation of the non-Muslim laws, therefore, is no violation at all to a Muslim.
What is incredible is the gall and audacity of Muslims in demanding that Western and other democracies legalize Shariah in their societies. Due to large populations of Muslims, mostly recent arrivals, in countries such as Canada, Great Britain, and Sweden, these countries are experiencing the insistent demands by Muslims to have Shariah rule their Islamic communities. This is just the beginning and it may seem relatively harmless to the simpletons in our midst. Yet, once Shariah is recognized to any extent, it will reach out to rule not only on matters that concern Muslims, but also those that may involve a Muslim and non-Muslim. Under Shariah, a Muslim man married to a non-Muslim woman is able to divorce the woman at will, automatically have custody of the children, and literally toss the wife out of “his” home with practically no compensation.
As for democracy, the rule of the people, Muslims have no use at all. Muslims believe that Allah’s rule must govern the world in the form of Caliphate—a theocracy. Making mockery of democracy, subverting its working, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of governance invented by the infidels.
To Muslims, Ummah-ism—international Islamism—is the legitimate form of government. Ummah-ism is another form of despotism such as Communism and Fascism, with the added feature of enjoying “divine” authority.
The world has good samples of Ummah-ism in practice to scrutinize in Islamic autocracies. Khamenei of Iran is not called "Caliph". He is called the “Supreme Guide.” The Saudi King is just another Caliph vessel of the "divine". These Islamic despots are every bit as vile as the Hitlers, the Stalins, the Pol Pots, and the Mussolinis. The government these Islamic autocrats head is infested to the core with the Islamic disease of oppression, corruption and the absence of accountability to the people.
Democracies believe that government must be of the people, by the people, and for the people. Ummah-ism is anathema to this sacrosanct fundamental democratic ideal.
As more and more Muslims arrive in non-Islamic lands, as they reproduce with great fecundity, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power to undermine the democratic rule. A consortium composed of pandering politicians, blinded with short-term self-interest and egoism; attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors; and, bastions of useful idiot liberals, universities, is the witting or unwitting promoter of Ummah-ism.
It is human nature to be concerned, first and foremost, with his personal well-being. Some people evolve to a higher level of humanness and place the welfare of the general public above their own. Yet, many remain fixated at the constricted stage of “self first, self, last.” Even if you belong to this latter group, your self-interest demands that you do all you can to make sure that the disease of Islamofascism does not devour democracy. Democracy is both fragile and corruptible. It takes vigilant citizenry to protect its integrity.
We fully agree with Churchill’s observation, "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest." Yet, as imperfect as it is, democracy is still humanity’s best system of self-rule. We, one and all, must defend it with our all.
Islamic mob stormed the UN office in Kabul and took life of its seven foreign staffs.
From the Chicago Tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-ap-as-afghanistan,0,6398486.story
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Afghans angry over the burning of a Quran at a small Florida church stormed a U.N. compound in northern Afghanistan on Friday, killing seven foreigners, including four Nepalese guards.
Afghan authorities suspect insurgents melded into the mob and they announced the arrest of more than 20 people, including a militant they suspect was the ringleader of the assault in Mazar-i-Sharif, the provincial capital of Balkh province. The suspect was an insurgent from Kapisa province, a hotbed of militancy about 250 miles (400 kilometers) southeast of the city, said Rawof Taj, deputy provincial police chief.
The topic of Quran burning stirred outrage among millions of Muslims and others worldwide after the Rev. Terry Jones' small church, Dove Outreach Center, threatened to destroy a copy of the holy book last year. The pastor backed down but the church in Gainesville, Florida, went through with the burning last month.
Four protesters also died in the violence in Mazar-i-Sharif, which is on a list of the first seven areas of the country where Afghan security forces are slated to take over from the U.S.-led coalition starting in July. Other demonstrations, which were peaceful, were held in Kabul and Herat in western Afghanistan, fueling resentment against the West at a critical moment in the Afghan war.
Protesters burned a U.S. flag at a sports stadium in Herat and chanted "Death to the U.S." and "They broke the heart of Islam." About 100 people gathered at a traffic circle near the U.S. Embassy in Kabul. One protester carried a sign that said: "We want these bloody bastard Americans with all their forces to leave Afghanistan."
U.N. peacekeeping chief Alain LeRoy said the top U.N. envoy in Afghanistan, Staffan De Mistura, who is in Mazar-i-Sharif, believes "the U.N. was not the target."
"They wanted to find an international target and the U.N. was the one there in Mazar-i-Sharif," LeRoy told reporters at U.N. headquarters in New York.
Initially, Afghan police reported that eight foreigners had been killed in Mazar-i-Sharif.
Late on Friday, Dan McNorton, a spokesman for the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan in Kabul, revised the death toll to seven — four foreign security guards and three other foreigners.
The guards were from Nepal, according to Gen. Daud Daud, commander of Afghan National Police in several northern provinces.
Sweden Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said Joakim Dungel, a 33-year-old Swede who worked at the U.N. office, was among those killed.
Norwegian Defense Ministry spokeswoman Maj. Heidi Langvik-Hansen said Lt. Col. Siri Skare, a 53-year-old female pilot working for the U.N., died in the attack.
LeRoy said the other victim was a citizen of Romania and that a number of U.N. personnel were injured and were being evacuated.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said the head of the mission in Mazar-i-Sharif, a Russian citizen, was injured in the attack, but not seriously.
Police who went to investigate, said the U.N. compound was littered with broken glass and bullet casings.
Abdul Karim, a police officer in the city, said he saw the bullet-riddled bodies of three Nepalese guards lying in the yard and a fourth on the first floor.
He said another victim with a serious head wound died on a stairway to the basement of the compound. A man who was killed inside a room had severe wounds to his face and body, Karim said.
Munir Ahmad Farhad, a spokesman in Balkh province, said the protest began peacefully when several hundred demonstrators gathered outside the U.N. mission's compound, choosing an obvious symbol of the international community's involvement in Afghanistan to denounce the Quran's desecration. It turned violent when some protesters seized the guards' weapons and started shooting, then the crowds stormed the building and set fires that sent plumes of black smoke into the air, he said.
One protester, Ahmad Gul, a 32-year-old teacher in the city, gave a different account. He said the protesters disarmed three guards to prevent any violence from breaking out. Associated Press video showed protesters banging AK-47 rifles on the curb, breaking them into pieces. He said the protesters were killed and wounded by Afghan security forces.
"I disarmed three guards myself and we took out the bullets," Gul said, sternly shaking his finger as he shouted. "With my eyes, I saw them (Afghan security forces) kill two and wound 10." As he talked, he became increasingly indignant and he started shouting: "Death to America!" ''We are going to fight."
LeRoy, the U.N. peacekeeping chief, said the security guards, all Gurkhas, "tried their best" but were unable to prevent the large number of demonstrators, some armed, from storming the U.N. compound.
The U.N. Security Council held an emergency meeting late Friday and condemned the attack "in the strongest terms."
The U.N.'s most powerful body also condemned "all incitement to and acts of violence" and called on the Afghan government to bring those responsible to justice and take steps to protect U.N. personnel and premises.
Muslims try to hide the true face of Islam and Muhammad by using blasphemy law, censorship, intimidation, death-threats and even murder. But the internet is proving their efforts futile: the mask of Islam and Muhammad are slowly but surely being exposed, potentially spelling the eventual death of Islam.
A Muslim author’s view on Blasphemy Law: In the February 2011 edition of the Bangalore-based monthly, Islamic Voice, appeared a very illuminating article, “Is blasphemy a capital crime in Islam?” by A Faizur Rahman. At the outset, the author says that if any one used derogatory words against Prophet Muhammad or insulted him, he used to advise his followers to adopt an attitude of forgiveness and forbearance; but today "Muslim extremism and Islamophobia now enjoy a symbiotic relationship feeding on each other’s fanaticism." Then to repudiate the assassination of Pakistani politician Salman Taseer, he says:
“Salman was killed, as confessed by his murderous bodyguard, for being a staunch opponent of the blasphemy law of Pakistan and seeking Presidential pardon for Aasia Bibi, the Christian woman who was recently awarded the death penalty under section 295-C of the Pakistani Penal Code for allegedly abusing Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).”
The author admits that use of derogatory language against Prophet Muhammad or any other Prophet is considered a great sin in Islam and worthy of death sentence. But his complaint was that the court pronounced the death sentence against Aasia Bibi in a hurry before the charges were incontrovertibly proven. It may be recalled that Lahore High Court judge Arif Iqbal Bhatti was shot dead by extremists in 1997 for acquitting two Christians of blasphemy charges. So, punishment for Aasia Bibi, a Christian, for blasphemy charges understandable. It is death, either be a judicial execution or extrajudicial murder by fanatics.
Does Islam support harsh punishment for blasphemy? The stance of the Quran and Prophet Muhammad on blasphemy is important in the context of the Penal Code for blasphemy in Pakistan (Section 295-C). There are some verses in the Quran, such as 6:68-59, 25:41, 38:4-5, 3:159), in which Allah urges Muhammad to exercise patience and forbearance at the critics of His revelations and mockers of the Prophet. Mr. Rahman also cited a few ahadith to show the Prophet's kindness toward his opponents. For example,
Since the above-mentioned verses of the Koran and the ahadith show that neither Allah nor Muhammad was in favour of harsh punishments to those, who used derogatory words against Prophet Muhammad or Allah's revelation, Mr. Rahman argues that section 295 C of Pakistan’s Blasphemy Law is not supported by the Koran and Sunnah. And he is astonished to see the religious frenzy, emotionalism and maddening perversity of the Pakistani extremists in this regard to the extent that one such fanatic has even announced an award of $6,000 to anyone who kills Aasia Bibi if the higher courts acquit her.
“It is precisely this kind of fiendish attitude that fuels Islamophobia across the globe”, says Faizur Rahman, adding:
Such is the sway of these preachers that Muslims in large numbers are falling prey to their manipulative agenda and have started to exhibit a supremacist attitude that looks down upon those who are reluctant to get initiated into their kind of Puritanism”. ...“The only way to neutralise the fanatics is for the moderate majority of the Muslims to morally and financially support the progressive scholars and help them intellectually counter religious chauvinism through the rational teachings of the Quran as done by the Prophet himself.”
Against above Quranic and hadith reference, Mr. Rahman ignored more explicit examples to the contrary, namely Muhammad's assassination of the poetess Asma and two other poets Kab bin Asraf and Abu Afak of Medina for writing poems criticizing his deeds.
Blasphemy law stifles freedom of expression: Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death for blasphemy by the Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini for Rushdie's derogatory depiction of Muhammad in his novel The Satanic Verses, and an Iranian businessman offered a $3 million reward to anyone for carrying out the sentence. Despite Khomeini death, the fatwa remains a permanent threat to Rushdie's life. The death-threat saga to Rushdie extended beyond the person of Rushdie: Professor Hitoshi Igarashi of the University of Tsukuba Ibaraki, the Japanese translator of his novel, was murdered in 1991; its Italian translator was beaten and stabbed in Milan; the novel's Norwegian publisher William Nygaard was shot in 1993; Aziz Nesin, a well-known Turkish satirist, was murdered in the hotel in Sivas, where he had invited people to listen to a speech based on some parts of the book.
Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasrin is another victim of blaspheming the Quran and Muhammad. In May 1994, a death-fatwa was issued against her for saying "…the Koran should be revised thoroughly". She was also under fire for her 1993 book Lajja (Shame).
In Pakistan, Ghulam Akbar, a Shi'a Muslim, was convicted of uttering derogatory remarks against Muhammad in 1998, and was sentenced to death; in August 2000, a Lahore court sentenced Abdul Hasnain Muhammad Yusuf Ali to death and 35 years' imprisonment for "defiling the name of Muhammad".
In 2001, prior to 9/11, American magazine Time printed an illustration of Muhammad along with the Archangel Gabriel waiting for a message from God. The magazine apologized for printing the illustration after widespread protests in Kashmir.
In June 2002, Iranian academic Hashem Aghajari gave a speech and asked Muslims to refrain from blindly following their clergy. He was sentenced to death for "blasphemy against Muhammad" in November 2002.
To assuage Muslims' opposition to the holding of Miss World pageant in Nigeria, This Day newspaper published an article, suggesting that had Muhammad been alive, he would have chosen one of the contestants as his bride -- based on a hadith, in which Ayesha said: Muhammad liked three things, good food, good perfume and women. The commentary sparked deadly riots across Nigeria that claimed over 200 lives.
Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh and Ayaan Hirsi Ali created the 10-minute film Submission in 2004 to highlight the mistreatment of, and violence against, women in Islamic societies. Both van Gogh and Hirsi Ali received death-threats after its release. On November 2, 2004, Van Gogh was stabbed and shot dead by a Muslim fanatic Mohammed Bouyeri in Amsterdam. Interested readers may see Blasphemy Law and Free Speech (Wikipedia Free Enclycopedia) for many similar stories.
Can Blasphemy Law hide the true face of Muhammad? Muslims use blasphemy law, threats and violence etc. to hide the truth about Islam and its prophet forever, but it is proving a futile exercise in the age of Internet, which has emerged as a useful and hard-to-suppress medium for exposing the truth about Muhammad and his evil creed Islam.
Numerous Websites have propped up in the Internet to expose the nature of the Quran and Prophet Muhammad, which is causing a deluge amongst Muslims to leave the cult of Islam. There are numerous Muslim apostates in the Internet -- social networking sites and blogs -- engaged in revealing the true face of Islam. A group of Bangladeshi apostates in the U.K. issued a statement explaining the reason why they have abandoned Islam, which was aired by the BBC. The statement read:
“One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Quran 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way.”
Recently, Dutch MP Geert Wilders, the Chairman of the Dutch Freedom Party and the maker of the short film FITNA, has written an article "Time To Unmask Muhammad", in which he cited many unflattering truths about Muhammad’s life and deeds.
Conclusion: The advent of the Internet has become a serious threat to unmask the true face of Islam and its originator Muhammad. It has enabled critics to overcome the taboo of telling the truth about Islam and Muhammad. As a result, gradually more and more people, both Muslims and non-Muslims, are comprehending the true face of Islam. This is spoiling the well-guarded of the image of Muhammad, which will weaken the central doctrine of the Islamic faith, the Kalema Taib, that says: La Ilaha Illallah, Mohammadur Rasulullah (Allah is the only God to be worshipped and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah). And this may spell the death for Islam. For this reason, more and more Islamic countries are blocking many Websites that are striving to expose the true face Islam and its founder.
References:
Watch these videos:
There is not another religion in the world that consistently produces terrorism in the name of religion as does Islam. The most dangerous Muslims are nearly always those who interpret the Koran most transparently. They are the fundamentalists or purists of the faith, and believe in Muhammad’s mandate to spread Islamic rule by the sword, putting to death those who will not submit.
Among every four humans in the world, one of them is Muslim. Islam is now the second largest religious group in France, Great Britain and USA!
There is no point in beating around the bush. The fact is that Islam is a militant, intolerant, incendiary religion whose adherents, whenever they establish "critical mass" of about 10 percent of a given population, begin to foment Violence, Revolt and Jihad --- in essence, a Declaration of War on Western Civilization.