Honor killing in Pakistan: Father Kills Six Daughters for Having Boyfriends

How far Islamic barbarism can go is beyond any civilized person can imagine. Here's a case: a Pakistani father, who was told by his son that two of his six daughters were having boyfriends in the neighborhoods, killed all of his six daughters to save honor.

---

From the Express Tribune on July 27, 2011:

Honour killings: Man guns down six daughters

---

FAISALABAD: A man gunned down six of his daughters on suspicion that two of them were in relationships with boys in the neighbourhood.

On Tuesday morning, Arif Mubashir called his teenage daughters to his room and shot them while the rest of the family, including their mother, watched. His wife Musarrat called the police after the incident.

Mubashir shot the girls after their brother said two of them were in a relationship. He told police officials that he had killed his daughters because they were both “without honour”. The man said his daughters Sameena, 14, and Razia, 16, were in a relationship with college boys from the neighbourhood and the sisters had helped each other. “I should have been told immediately but the girls sided with each other. They were both corrupt,” Mubashir told Tandlianwala Police Inspector Javed Sial.

Police officials have taken Mubashir into custody and filed a case against him. “He does not regret what he did. He boasted that he would do it all over again if he had to,” Sial told reporters.

Pakistan has repeatedly been termed as one of the least women-friendly countries. In June, the Thompson Reuters Foundation ranked Pakistan as the world’s third most dangerous country for women.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 27^th, 2011.

Enlightening My Father about the Real Islam and the Fatal Consequence

This article is to make those Muslims, who wish to discover the truth about their religion, aware of the fact that the truth about real Islam can be hard to come to terms with; it may even turn fatal as happened with my father. (Read in Bahasha Indonesia)

I am a non-Arab Indian Muslim. I went for a job to Saudi Arabia as a pious Muslim and returned to my beloved country as an Atheist after ten long years of service there. I was trained by my parents to pray five times a day from childhood and read the Quran daily in "Arabic". In a simple term, I was the perfect Muslim according to the Indian standard of Islam.

There were several factors behind my conversion to Atheism from Islam in Saudi Arabia. Out of them, the very important factor was: I was teased by my Arab colleagues for not being a perfect Muslim. I found it an insult to my religious pride, because I was thinking that I was the perfect Muslim.

The mental torture, which I had received from them, forced me to study and analyze Islam. They laughed at me for not knowing the meaning of the Quran. So, I read the translation of the "Holy Quran" in my mother tongue URDU, which I hadn't done before. In India, we never read the Quran in our own mother tongue. Instead, we were made to read it in the holy language of Allah and the Prophet -- “the language of afterlife” -- which is Arabic. Though we don’t understand the meaning of a single Arabic word, it is thought to bring more virtue (swaab).

When my Arab colleagues teased me of not understanding the Quran, I took to reading it in Urdu so that I could understand its meaning and could become a more pious, a better, Muslim.

As started reading it in Urdu, I had a shock and was confused after few pages. Many of the verses seemed barbaric. And what I did: Instead of suspecting the teaching of the supposedly perfect divine Quran, I suspected my proficiency in Urdu. Then, I read it in other languages I knew, including English. All the translations were consistent: Whether in Urdu or English, those verses gave the same meaning. Then only was I sure that my knowledge in Urdu was not the problem; the Quran itself is problematic.

After coming back from Saudi Arabia to my motherland as an Atheist, I felt pity on my aging parents, who are wasting their precious time in praying five times a day, plus in additional midnight prayers. Apart from that, they were always in fear about their death and the tortures they may receive in their graves as per the teachings of Islam. As a filial, loving son, and a responsible human being, I vowed to liberate my beloved parents from the shackles and tyranny of the Islamic dogma.

But it was a very difficult tusk to explain the faults of religion to people in their 70s so as to change their belief. I explained to my religious parents the complete scenario of my experience in Saudi Arabia: the disrespectful behavior of most of the Saudis and their “(in)hospitality” toward non-Muslims and non-Arab Muslims.

They simply rejected my words and were not prepared to hear anything odd about their Arab brothers. It's because the non-Arab Muslims hold great reverence for the Saudis, since they belongs to Islam's holy land, the land of their beloved prophet. Let me, here, make it clear that I do not hate the Saudis, who have been fooled by Prophet Muhammad and his Islam. Instead, I feel pity for them, as they are the first and worst victims of Islam.

Determined to enlighten my parents about the true face of Islam, I persisted and my parents eventually accepted my words about the Saudis. But to absolve Islam of the Saudi's bad behaviour and attitude, they now switched argument: Maybe you are correct, because the bad Saudis had given so much trouble to our beloved prophet during his lifetime.

Here, my parents now tried to shield Prophet Muhammad, the only one Saudi man, thanks to tremendous reverence they hold toward him. Then, I revealed the true character of Muhammad to them from his hadiths, which also make the Saudis behave in such manners. Then they said, they don’t trust the hadiths, as most of them were written by the enemies of Islam.

Since they said they don't trust the hadiths, I told them, in frustration, to stop praying five times a day, because the Quran never mentions anything about praying five times a day; it is only mentioned in the hadiths.

While Muslims overwhelmingly believe hadiths as the holy tradition of the Prophet, it has now become a new tactic amongst non-Arab Muslims of our age that if a hadith preaches something about Islam and Muhammad, which is contrary to local ethics and morality, then it is a weak hadith. They are taught by the mullahs that most of the hadiths, which reveals the true character of Muhammad, but does not suit the culture of the locals, were written by the enemies of Islam.

The culture of Saudi Arabia, which fits well with teachings of the Islamic scriptures, can’t fit with cultures of the rest of the World. I like to share with the readers one such “cultural difference”, which I witnessed in Saudi Arabia. I witnessed an old man, aged over 75 years, with his two wives alive, took a third time -- a 17 year old Jordanian girl (Because the “cost” of the girl is comparatively cheaper in Jordon. Readers please excuse my language. But this is the reality). As he returned with the young bride, he was given a very warm welcome by his well-educated sons, aged between 40 and 50. They took him on their shoulders, clapping and singing. They don’t even bother about the fate of their own mothers. They shared the joyful moments by praising their father's “manliness” with their neighbors and friends. The language they used to glorify their father’s “manliness” can’t be explained here, as it is too crude, pornographic. Given the sons were well-educated, we can't blame their lack of education for such behavior. It is impossible for the civilized societies to adopt such culture, not even by the cultured non-Arab Muslim societies.

The blame lies on the culture, created and encouraged by Muhammad, which can be seen in many hadiths. After all, it's a central doctrine in Islam that Muslims must emulate the Prophet as best as possible.

So, the mullahs do their best to reject such hadiths, which contradicts the local culture, as non-authentic and weak, although they are from Sahih Al-Bukhari, which Muslims accept as the authentic collection -- a book, regarded next to the Quran in the Muslim world.

I explained to my parents about the six authentic collections of hadiths, out of numerous collections. Their faith towards the dogma of Islam was so deep that I failed to convince them in this effort. But I am not of the sort, who would give up easily. So, this time, I showed them the Quranic verses, in which Allah asks Muslims to follow Muhammad’s sunnah and also the other important, but unacceptable, verses of the Quran.

Then my father, in his 70s, also started reading the Quran, like me, in his mother tongue Urdu for the first time. For the past 70 years of his life, he had been reading the Arabic Quran daily, which he didn’t understand. As for my mom, she is an illiterate, like most of the Muslim women of her age in India, and never read the Quran even in Arabic.

After reading a few pages of the Quran in Urdu, in a language that helped him understood the meaning of verses, my father, too, become disturbed because of many unacceptable verses. Having gotten a shock, he started doubting the reliability of the author, the translator and the publisher, and stopped reading it. He now scolded me for purchasing the Quran, which has been printed by the enemies of Islam -- either Hindus or Christians.

I was able to convince him with facts that the translation was done by the scholars of Islam, and that it was published for the benefit of Muslims. He now asked me: why Muslims are printing such wrong translations of the Quran?

I told him that those scholars and publishers were not to blame; the problem was his lifelong misunderstood perception of Islam as a divine and perfect creed. My father was not ready to accept my explanations, neither was he ready to read the Quran further -- even if it was published by a reliable Muslim publisher -- because he was now afraid of losing his faith.

At this point, I tried to encourage him to continue reading it, saying that it was not a good sign that he is afraid of losing his faith. But he totally refused to read it, and I, kind of, failed again in my mission at this point. Here, the readers can sense the level of ignorance amongst moderate Muslims, who know nothing about the real Islam, and their obdurate refusal to enlighten themselves about it.

I continued nurturing hopes that my father would eventually discover the truth about Islam and free himself from its shackles. And It took me almost 10 years for my father to, eventually, read the whole Quran in Urdu. To my joy, he, at the age of 80, showed courage to read it completely. The atrocities perpetrated by Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda over recent years were vital in my convincing him to read and understand the Quran's messages. Initially, whenever he would hear a news of Al-Qaeda's heartless terrorist atrocities, he would start abusing Osama. But I used to argue with him so as to defend Osama as the best amongst Muslims as per the teaching of the Quran and hadiths. The atrocities committed by Osama's Jihadi followers in the name of Islam, coupled with my arguments with him, induced my father to read the Urdu Quran, hoping to understand its real message. All thanks to Osama.

Then my father requested me to brief him about some hadiths, which I had previously tried to explain to him to show Islam in a negative light. But I felt embarrassed to explain the semi-pornographic hadiths about Muhammad to my father, as a major portion of the hadiths glorifies sex and violence. So, I told him to read them by himself, instead of hearing it from someone else to be more credible. He read only a few hadiths and stopped, because he couldn’t go beyond. He had lost his faith already and declared it scrap.

The reading of the Quran, biography of Muhammad and few Hadiths in a language he understood led my father into depression and may have effected his health. He was not able to come out of this shock. He repeatedly asked me, like an innocent child, about the outcome of his 80 years of worship of Islam, and the valuable time he had spent in five-time daily prayers, mid-night prayers and other Islamic deeds. I consoled him by saying not to worry about the past; instead, I encouraged him to feel happier, as he has been freed of the fear of all alleged punishments and tortures during death, in the grave and in the hereafter. He was convinced, but still, he couldn’t tolerate the way he had been cheated by the mullahs all his life. He thanked me for rescuing him from the fear of the horror of the Islamic grave and the Hell.

Sadly, I have lost my beloved father within a few months of his enlightenment about Islam, as he was unable to come to terms with the shock, which not only perished his faith but also deteriorated his health.

He was very dedicated Muslim and spent all his life (except the last few months) praying and reading the Quran in Arabic -- "the language of Paradise" -- without understanding its meaning. During his last days, he felt heavily not only about his wasted precious years, more so about the way he -- an educated and intelligent person -- was deceived by the mullahs for 80 years, which accelerated the worsening his health and eventually his death.

At the first instance, I felt a sense of guilt for his early death, which was caused, to a good extent, by my being able to convince him to study and understand Islam. But when I recall his last days, I also feel satisfied that he faced his bodily end on earth with confidence, without the fear of tortures and hellfire as taught in Islam. Indeed, I feel proud of myself for being able to liberate him from the barbaric beliefs of Islam. I believe he would have accepted my effort at his enlightenment about Islam as the best return for the fatherly love and affection he had bestowed upon me.

For a Muslim, getting to the truth about Islam is the toughest battle in life. And the shock they get when they find out the truth can be tough to come to terms with, as was with my father, for whom it, to some extent, turned fatal. Muslims, who seek to discover the truth about Islam, should be mentally prepared before doing so.

Islam Set to Become the Dominant Primer of Future Extremist Violence by Non-Muslims?

From India to Nigeria to Norway, Islam is forcing non-Muslims, too, into extremist violence.

---

This article appeared in Jihad Watch

In recent decades, Muslims have obviously been the overwhelmingly dominant perpetrators of religiously-motivated extremist violence, targeting non-Muslims and their allies within the Muslim community, as well as Muslim sects which they consider deviant from orthodox Islam. But over the last couple of decades, extremist violence by non-Muslims, targeting people of differing faiths, has been becoming increasingly frequent. And disturbingly, an Islamic connection is becoming a common motivator of these non-Muslim extremist violence: Non-Muslims commit those violence due to instigation by Muslims or as retaliation to preceding violence by Muslims.

In the West, the last time a non-Muslim extremist committed a major terrorist massacre was the Oklahoma City Bombing by Timothy McVeigh (professed to be an atheist of Christian heritage) on April 19, 1995 that killed 168 people and injured 450. McVeigh's motive was his anger at the Waco Siege at Texas (February 28 to April 19, 1993) by the FBI that left 76 people of the infamous David Koresh-led Davidian Sect dead.

And whenever extremist Muslim groups or individuals have committed similar terrorist atrocities in recent years, we have been reminded by Muslims and their apologists with reference to the McVeigh incident that people of all persuasions -- Islam, Christianity, Judaism, White Supremacism, Communism, and such -- can commit extremist violence. So, Islam should not associated with extremism and terrorism for the actions of its individual followers, just as violence by a Christian or Jewish extremist must not be attributed to their faiths.

Now, in the West, we have a new extremist massacre in Norway: Bombing and a horrendous shooting spree in Oslo, both apparently committed by Anders Behring Breivik, a Norwegian Nationalist extremist and a Christian, have left nearly 100 innocent people dead. This Oslo extremist violence incident will certainly add further fuel to the Islamic apologists' attempt to shield Islam from criticism for the atrocities radical Muslims commit in the name of their religion.

The purpose of this note is, however, to highlight how Islam is also becoming the dominant motivating or instigating factor behind the extremist violence committed by non-Muslims around the world.

The connection of Breivik's motivation to Islam is already crystal clear. His 1,500-page manifesto, entitled "2083: A European Declaration of Independence”, is all about Europe's "Islam problem" caused by unrestrained Muslim immigration and aided by the predominantly leftist political elite. About Islam's historical problems, Breivik writes (p. 39):

Since the creation of Islam in the 7th century and to up to this day, the Islamic Jihad has systematically killed more than 300 million non Muslims and tortured and enslaved more than 500 million individuals. Since 9/11 2001, more than 12 000 Jihadi terrorist attacks have occurred around the world which have led to the death of one or more non-Muslims [2] per attack. In other words; there are around 150 deadly Jihadi attacks per month around the world. This trend will continue as long as there are non-Muslim targets available and as long as Islam continues to exist.

He mentions of the Norway government's cowardly handling of the Muslim rage surrounding the publication of Prophet Muhammad's cartoons in Danish magazine (2006-2007). His major concern: Muslim immigration, actively promoted by present leftist governments, was bringing in chaos to Europe. When thousands of Muslim enclaves in Europe -- in Norway, Sweden, Britain, France, Netherlands, and other countries -- have already become "no-go zones" for the native Europeans, and more and more neighborhoods with growing Muslim populations are becoming inhospitable to the natives, who are often forced out of those areas through intimidation and even violence by Muslims, Breivik's concern is not at all groundless. And he sees solution to this Tsumani of Europe's "Islam problem" in the waging of a "Western European Resistance Movements (anti-Marxist/anti-Jihad movements)" -- a European Civil War -- by the so-called "patriotic European political activists" against Muslims and their leftist allies; and he predicts it will eventually be won by the Resistance Movement in 2083 with the annihilation of the Leftists/Marxists and deportation of Muslims. His terrorist actions on July 23, 2011, are declaration of that Civil War, in which he targeted youths of Norway's Leftist ruling party.

Apart from the Norway incident, India is another hotspot where we see extremist homicidal violence committed by non-Muslim Hindus that are also connected to Islam: Hindus commit those violence either upon instigation by Muslims or in retaliation to preceding violence by them. An example is the infamous 2002 Gujarat Violence, in which Hindus attacked Muslims and Muslims counter-attacked. The violence resulted in 790 Muslim and 254 Hindu deaths. What is often omitted from discussion about Gujarat riot is that Hindus committed it in retaliation to an earlier Muslim atrocity, in which they set fire on a train full of Hindu devotees, mostly women and children, burning 59 Hindus to death.

Over in Africa, Christians in Nigeria (and other countries) have suffered sustained horrendous violence at the hands of increasingly radicalized Muslims in recent years. And on a few occasions, Christians have hit back in retaliation, causing large-scale homicide of Muslims.

One must consider the fact that the Chinese and Indians (Hindus) are also immigrating to Europe in large numbers, but they are no concern to Breivik; his concern is exclusively directed at the Muslim immigrants. The reason is: the non-Muslim Chinese and Indian immigrants integrate in European societies, or, at least, live peacefully with their native neighbors. But Muslims not only refuse to integrate in the host societies, but also have become a major source of social scourge and violence: all sorts of criminal activities, terrorist attacks, as well as rapes and eviction of the natives.

And source of these problems is Islam, not the individuals. Britain is facing problems with Muslim immigrants from Bangladesh and Pakistan, but not with the equally-large Hindu immigrant community from the same region. The Hindu and Muslim immigrants from the subcontinent are the same as individuals; religion is the only difference between them.

As the burgeoning and increasingly radicalized and violent Muslim populations distress non-Muslims all over the world, including in non-Muslim-majority countries, extremist violence by non-Muslims, like the acts committed by Hindus in India, Christians in Nigerian and the Norwegian nationalist Breivik, are set to become increasingly frequent. A full-scale Civil War in Europe, as anticipated by Breivik, cannot be ruled out. Instead, it remains a real possibility and may spread to other parts of the world.

The indiscriminate and ruthless killing of innocent young people by Breivik to draw attention to Europe's "Islam problem," as well as those committed by the Hindus in India or Christians in Nigeria, are tragic and indefensible. But as the state of affairs stands now, the occurrence of such tragic incidents with increasing frequency in future also looks to be a definite possibility. It is in the hands of governments as well as of Muslims themselves to mitigate the problem. Muslim immigrants can learn from the Hindu or Chinese immigrants in their host countries, while the governments should pay serious attention to a real problem, instead of turning a blind eye to it, which they have done for way too long.

---

M. A. Khan is the author of Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery and the editor of islam-watch.org.

Prophet Muhammad was an Apostate of Islam

Muhammad violated too many of Allah's divine laws at whims to serve his interests, desires and lust. He was, thus, an apostate of Islam. He managed to avoid the punishment of apostasy -- death by beheading -- on earth. But what's happening to him in next life. Frolicking with 72 heavenly whores? The Quran may give an inkling (46.9): "I do not know what will be done to me"

---

MUHAMMAD'S OVER-RULING OF ALLAH

Allah says in many places in Quran that he made Mohammad the last prophet after whom he will not send any one else. But Mohammad over-ruled Allah and announced that Jesus will be the last prophet and will come after him.

Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 425:

Allah's Apostle said, "Son of Mary (Jesus) will shortly descend amongst you people”

Muslims party during the night after fasting but Prophet Muhammad partied during the day while fasting

MUHAMMAD DEFIED THE QURAN

Allah said in Quran that his message and words in Quran are final and nothing in it will be changed (15.9). His final words about people of the book are that either they will pay Jizya or they will be killed (9.29). However Mohammad changed it. He said that Jizya will be abolished.

Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 425:

Allah’s Apostle said, "Jesus will break the Cross and kill the pigs and abolish the Jizya"

MUHAMMAD VIOLATED MARRIAGE LAW

Allah allowed Muslims to have up to four wives (Q 4.3) at one time. Mohammad had at least 9 wives with him when he kicked the bucket.

MUHAMMAD ATE AND DRANK DURING FASTING

Allah set rules of fasting in Quran as follows:

Quran 2.287: "Allah Hath ordained (for fasting in Ramadan) for you not to eat or drink from dawn to dusk."

But Muhammad ate and drank as he pleased

Tabaqat by Saad Vol. 1, p. 369:

Muhammad found it difficult to abstain from food and water, from dawn to dusk, so he ate whenever he pleased. Ibn Sa’d writes: “The Messenger of Allâh used to say ‘We the prophets are required to eat our morning food later than others and hurry in breaking our fast in the evening.'” [3]

MUHAMMAD'S SEXUAL ACTIVITIES WHILE FASTING

Allah prohibited any sexual activity during fasting.

The Quran says (002.187): Approach your wives only in the night after completing the fast.

But Prophet Mohammad approached his wives whenever he got turned on.

FOOLING AROUND WITH YOUNG WIVES

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 319:

When fasting Prophet saw naked little Aisha playing with her doll, he got all worked up Prophet’s wife in her izar during menstruation, waiting for a midmorning fondling session by fasting prophet

UM-Salama said, “Allah's Apostle, while fasting called me and took me with him under the woollen sheet."

(Ordering his wife to get under a woolen sheet with him).

MUHAMMAD'S FONDLING, TONGUE SUCKING

Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 13, Number 2380:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) used to kiss her and suck her tongue when he was fasting.

MUHAMMAD'S HUGGING, PETTING AND DISCHARGING

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 31, Number 149:

Ayesha said "The Prophet used to kiss and embrace his wives while he was fasting. The person who gets discharge should complete his fast."

MUHAMMAD'S JOINT BATHING AFTER EJACULATION

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 319:

"Um- Salama said. The Prophet and I used to take the bath of Janaba from a single pot”

MUHAMMAD VIOLATED THE IDDAH LAW

Allah said in Quran that for a widow there is a waiting period (iddah) of three menstrual periods before remarrying (2.234). Mo banged Juavaria, Safia and Rehana the same night he killed their husbands without giving any prescribed waiting period.

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:

Narrated Anas:

Prophet attacked Khaybar unannounced. Their men were killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet (he banged her the same night) .

Bukhari vol 3, Book46, No. 717:

Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day (he banged her the same night).

"Sirat e Rasulullah" by Ishaq, p. 464: "The apostle divided their property, wives and children as booty. He took Rayhana d. Amr b. Khunafa for himself (he banged her the same night)."

MUHAMMAD FROLICKED WITH MENSTRUATING WOMEN

Allah has ordered men to keep away from menstruating women.

Quran 2.222

YUSUFALI: They ask thee concerning women's courses. Say: They are a hurt and a pollution: So keep away from women in their courses, and do not approach them until they are clean.

Muhammad did exactly the opposite. He hugged and kissed them, sucked their tongues, fondled their private parts and even slept with his between their naked thighs.

MUHAMMAD FONDLED YOUNG MENSTRUATING WIVES

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 298:

Narrated 'Aisha:

The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 319:

Narrated Zainab bint Abi Salama:

Allah's Apostle said, 'Have you got your menses?' I replied, 'Yes.' Then he called me and took me with him under the woolen sheet."

MUHAMMAD PUT HIS CHEEKS BETWEEN NAKED THIGHS OF MENSTRUATING WIVES

One of Prophet’s favourite activities was to lie on top of naked menstruating wives with his chest on their thighs.

Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 1, Number 0270:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:

One night he entered (upon me) while I was menstruating. He said: Come near me. I said: I am menstruating. He said: Uncover your thighs. I, therefore, uncovered both of my thighs. Then he put his cheek and chest on my thighs and I lent upon he until he became warm and slept.

MUHAMMAD COMMITTED ADULTERY

Miraaj: Prophet rode to heaven on a woman-faced buraq or had an adulterous ride in bed with cousin Hani??

Allah has called adultery (sex outside marriage) evil and an abomination.

Quran 17.032: "And come not near unto adultery. Lo! it is an abomination and an evil way."

Quran 24.030: "Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty"

Muhammad violated this prohibition discreetly in Mecca and then openly later in Medina,

MIRAAJ: CELEBRATED ADULTEROUS NIGHT OF THE PROPHET

Islamic literature says (Martin Lings, p.33, 101, 103-104, 299; Ibn Ishaq, p.184, Tabari, vol. viii, p.186) that Muhammad passionately loved his first cousin Hani, daughter of his uncle Abu Talib. She was married to a pagan Hibayrah, but Mo had an adulterous relationship with her. He often sneaked and banged Hani whenever Hibayrah was not around after Khadija had died.

Muhammad’s most famous adulterous night is celebrated all over the world by praying, and cooking special meals. It is called “shab e Mairaj”. Muslims think that Mohammad entered into Heaven that night. Little do they know that Mohammad had entered into Hani, not heaven, that night. Here is the story.

One early morning when Muhammad was sneaking out of Hani’s house after an all night steamy action, his followers who were looking for him, caught him with his pants down. They asked angrily what was he doing with Hani when her husband was out of town. Very embarrassed, he concocted the ridiculous story of having gone to heaven all night riding an animal with a beautiful face of a woman. Most of his die hard followers believed that silly story (but some smarter ones considered it bullshit and quietly left Islam). Actually Muhammad’s story was allegorical. He did ride beautiful Hani who was a wild animal in bed; and he did feel like he was in heaven all night...

Later, when Muhammad became militarily strong and conquered Mecca, he went to Umm Hani's house and stayed there overnight. Umm Hani's husband had foreseen the fall of Mecca and had fled to Najran. And this time probably his followers cheered when he came out of her home after an adulterous night. No body dared to criticize him this time; they had seen his critics getting their heads chopped off.

Prophet Muhammad lusted for men

MUHAMMAD'S LUSTING FOR MEN

The Quran clearly prohibited men for lusting for other men.

Quran 7.81: "…ye practice your lusts on men, ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds."

But Mohammad, who lusted for beautiful women like his son Zaid’s wife Zainab, also lusted for good-looking men like his son Zaid.

Tafsir of al-Qurtubi—an authoritative exegesis in Islam.

Aisha said that, one day, while Muhammad was lying naked in bed, Zaid came knocking; Muhammad, without getting dressed, opened the door and “hugged and kissed him”.

Mohammad also had a crush on a young and handsome young man Zahir.

Sunan Bayhaqi and Al Halabi

According to this hadith, a man named Zahir, who used to say, "The prophet loves me," said that one day Muhammad crept unawares behind him and put him in a bear-hug. Zahir, alarmed, yelled, “Get off me!” After turning his head and discovering that it was Muhammad, he stopped struggling and proceeded to “push his back into the prophet’s chest.”

APOSTATES ARE BEHEADED IN ISLAM

Allah (R), Muhammad's imaginary slave, gave whatever he wanted and needed

In Islam, an apostate is killed by beheading and bleeding to death. When Mohammad was dying a very painful death he thought that Real God was cutting his aorta and bleeding him to death for his sins.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 713:

Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died said “I feel as if my aorta is being cut."

MORAL OF THE STORY

Muhammad had lied to the world that he received Quran from Allah. He often felt guilty for this deception to gain power wealth and women and causing so much bloodshed; he prayed for forgiveness from the real God whoever it was. He was worried that the l God may punish him in the afterlife. His statement in Quran points to it.

Quran 46.9: I do not know what will be done to me

(No wonder he thought God was beheading him when he was dying).

Ramadan: When Time No Longer Mattered

The Muslim fasting month of Ramadan may begin on August 1 this year. Or perhaps it will not. The start of Ramadan must be determined by religious clerics observing the new moon with the naked eye. Also, Ramadan may begin in different countries on different days – because the new moon appears on different days as it orbits the earth. Islamic obsession with physically observing the new moon obscures the embarrassing truth that the accuracy of time doesn’t really matter much in Islam.

---

Scientific calculatians can predict the time of moon-rise with an error of only a few seconds. But in Islamic tradition, Ramadan fasting cannot start until the moon has been sighted by naked eyes, which is grossly inaccurate.

Today’s quartz watches have an accuracy of 10 to 20 seconds a year. A watch that gains or loses even a few minutes a day would be discarded, or at least sent to the jeweler for repairs. So it is remarkable that Muslims use a calendar which is out-of-sync with the solar year by eleven days a year. A wristwatch marking Muslim time would be off by 43 minutes a day!

The explanation for this phenomenal inaccuracy in keeping time is that Muslims observe a lunar year, while the rest of the world observes a solar year. Long ago, observing the moon was a crude but convenient way of marking the passing of calendar months, but almost nobody was foolish enough to believe that 12 cycles of the moon constituted a full year. Long before Islam was introduced, astronomers adjusted between the lunar year and the solar year by inserting the missing days in a “thirteenth month” – a process called “intercalculation.”

But the moon is a central element of Islamic ideology. In the Quran, Allah swears by the moon (Surah 74:32). The crescent moon adorns the tops of mosques and the flags of Muslim countries. Some scholars even assert that Allah is actually the Moon God of the Meccan Quraysh tribe. Because the moon is so central to Islam, using the moon to mark time became an important religious distinction for Muslims – even if it failed to mark time accurately. So in his final address to Muslims, Muhammad made a major point of condemning the practice of intercalculation:

"Intercalculating a month is an increase in unbelief whereby the unbelievers go astray; one year they make it profane, and hallow it another, [in order] to agree with the number that God has hallowed, and so profane what God has hallowed, and hallow what God has made profane... The number of months with Allah is twelve: [they were] in the Book of God on the day He created the heavens and the earth." (Al Tabari, Vol. IX, para. 1754, and Surahs 9:36 and 9:37)

The origins of Islam were basically urban, with many allusions to trade and commerce in the texts. Seasons were not as important to urban dwellers as they were to farmers. Islam had a poor understanding of agriculture, as reflected by the claim that rainfall was important for farming in Egypt (Surah 12:49) or that the moon could be used to determine the seasons (Surah 10.5). So it was probably disconcerting to Muhammad that the farmers around Medina used the Jewish intercalculated solar calendar in preference to the Muslim lunar calendar. Ultimately, Muhammad and Quran condemned that as un-Islamic.

For Muslims, the calendar wasn’t used primarily for planting or harvesting crops. Rather it was used for determining when Muslims could engage in fasting, pilgrimages, and most importantly, collective jihad. Read Surah 9:36 again: "...And fight against those who ascribe divinity to aught beside Allah, all together – just as they fight against you, [Oh, believers] all together."

Modern Islamic apologists extol the virtue of the shortened year, because it allows the fasting month to occur during all the seasons of the year, and thus helps Muslims experience and understand the plight of needy fellow Muslims during all seasons. There are plenty of studies, however, that show that Muslims actually consume 50% more food during Ramadan than during other months in the year. So much for experiencing poverty! Anyone who has seen farmers harvesting their crops at night by lamp-light during Ramadan -- because they physically cannot work the fields without food and water during the harvest season -- would have no sympathy for the merits of a seasonally rotating fasting season.

So this year, I hope my Muslim friends will take time to reflect on the abject failure of Islamic timekeeping to be useful for anything – whether it is knowing when to plant crops or when to schedule a major holiday. A $20 Timex watch almost 50,000 times more accurate.

How the Establishment of a Palestinian State Would Affect the Life of Arabs in Palestine

With a corrupt P.A. or lawless militant HAMAS in power -- who are incapable of instituting a viable economy -- it's anybody's guess.

---

"In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed". (Stanisław Jerzy Lec)

History knows many proofs of the famous proverb: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions". High-minded dreams of some result in sweat, tears and blood of others.

Supporting the Palestinian state is a modern tendency. The problem is that nobody has asked Palestinians themselves what that wanted. It is clear that any inhabitant of Jenin or Nablus would without a hitch tell the BBC or CNN correspondents that he longs for Free Palestine. Any other reaction is impossible in a patriarchal or totalitarian society. When foreigners asked a "Homo Soveticus" about his vital values, he immediately recollected his "Love for Motherland". It didn't stop him from savoring jokes about communist leaders, and having a yen for American tape recorders and jeans.

The recent (May 2011) poll of the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion (PCPO) has revealed that 35% of East Jerusalem Arabs would prefer Israeli citizenship, and the same number refrained from answering the question. In case of dividing Jerusalem, 40% said they would try to get over to Israel.

According to a similar poll by Pechter Middle East Polls Institute conducted in January 2011 in 19 Arab quarters of East Jerusalem, 54% of Palestinians prefer to remain under Israeli jurisdiction. 39% were sure that their neighbors were eager to get Israeli passports.

Another PCPO poll was conducted in June 2011 after the reconciliation between FATAH and HAMAS. It showed that Palestinians wanted independence but their major concerns were corruption, unemployment and poverty (36%). Only 30% thought that their most serious problems were Israeli occupation and settlement activity.

This is hardly a sensation. When in 2000 in Camp-David Ehud Barak, the former Israeli Prime Minister expressed readiness to transfer significant parts of East Jerusalem to Arafat, Arab inhabitants of Shuafat and Beit Hanina villages in the North of Jerusalem started buying dwellings in the village of Beit Safafa in South Jerusalem, which would remain within the borders of Israel.

Over many years, Arabs of the West Bank have tried to move to East Jerusalem and obtain Israeli citizenship. Today Arab speeches can be heard in many Jewish quarters of the city. Arabs, both Christians and Muslims, buy apartments here. However, they don’t hesitate to speak in favor of an independent Palestinian state.

These are the realities of the Middle East that are incomprehensible to a Western observer. However, the phenomenon of "split consciousness" has a simple explanation. On the one hand, Palestinians cherish the dream of their own state and destruction of Israel. On the other hand, they want to exist normally here and now putting off their expectations for an uncertain future.

They don't have any sympathies either for the Jews, or for their state. But they want to get jobs in Israel. Moreover, the citizens of East Jerusalem have numerous advantages: medical and social insurance, good job possibilities, government protection from extortion, corruption and gangster bands. They are also protected from HAMAS -- in case it comes to power -- from imposing on them its cruel way of life as in Gaza.

According to official Palestinian data, a couple of years ago about 12,000 Palestinians worked on settlement construction in the West Bank. It was their main and sometimes the only source of livelihood, which they lost after the Palestinian Authority (PA) prohibited Arabs from doing jobs in the construction of Jewish settlements.

But the PA itself is not able to provide any reasonable alternative. From their own contractors, Palestinians receive 100-150 shekels per day but 350-450 shekels a day from the Israeli contractors. Palestinians hope that the houses constructed by their own hands will one day become their property. But today they desperately need money for existence and look sadly at Romanians and Thais replacing them in construction sites in Israel.

The enlightened world was exulted over Israel leaving the Gaza strip. However, the people of Khan Younis hardly shared that enthusiasm, because they used to earn in hothouses of Gush-Katif more in a month than they now receive in a year in the form of humanitarian help or doing odd jobs.

It is not difficult to foresee what will happen when the world unilaterally recognizes the Palestinian state as the Arab nations are now planning to. Existing economic ties between Israel and the PA will collapse; the West Bank will be cut off from Israel; the political atmosphere will make it impossible for Arabs to work in Israel; and the Palestinian economy that has hardly recovered after long years of crisis will again be plunged into chaos.

According to a PCPO poll, today 26% of Palestinians are ready to leave the West Bank. This is anyone's guess how this number will increase in case of sharp deterioration in the economic situation of the new state.

A Palestinian state, unilaterally or otherwise, will probably be proclaimed one day. But its impact on the life and livelihood of Palestinians is not hard to foresee?

Courageous Australian Political Advisor Sacked for Speaking the Truth about Islam

All he did is posted violent Quranic verses and duly called Muhammad "the first terrorist in the name of Islam" on his Facebook page.

---

Joseph Adams

Joseph Adams, who worked in the electorate office of the Smithfield Party Liberal of Australia NSW as an adviser, was sacked on Friday for posting violent passages of the Quran on his Facebook page including a description of Prophet Muhammad as "the first terrorist of Islam".

Mr. Adams’ comments angered some of his 1000 Facebook “friends”, which include 15 state government MPs and four ministers.

He was labelled a "bigot" and the ”biggest f—ing racist ever" by his Facebook "friends."

No one will accuse anyone of racism for criticizing Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Communism or any faith or ideology. Yet somehow, some people are convinced that Islam is a race. This false narrative is inculcated in the western world by Muslims many people who refuse to think have bought into it.

”The religious babble you refer to is Islam,” he commented on June 4. ”There was no war. It was terrorism. Muhammad was the first terrorist in the name of Islam.”

He followed up with: “Why are you getting upset? I’m not the one who is teaching others to kill in the name of Islam. Mohommed is not my hero.”

On March 24, he responded to a Facebook ”friend,” Faten Dabs with the comment: ”If you leave Islam it is HALAL for you to be EXECUTED. Lol. No wonder people are afraid to leave Islam.”

Joseph Adams has spoken the truth. The Quran promotes violence and Muhammad was a terrorist. Muslims are afraid of leaving Islam for anyone who does do so, would be killed.

When someone made an absurd comparison between Jesus and Muhammad, and branded him as “a bigot” Adams responded: ”Your biblical quotes are as ridiculous as your comparisons. I guess you never paid attention at Sunday school. Jesus spoke in parables. Mohommed on the other hand gave orders to kill.”

”You seem to like standing up for killers and murderers. Is Ivan Milat a good person too? Perhaps you think Hitler was a great Prophet too? After all he did put a book together called Mein Kampf. Don’t waste our time here Aaron. The only bigot here is someone with an uninformed view.”

Joseph Adams is a courageous man for merely speaking the truth. He, who identifies himself as an Australian of Assyrian Christian descent, told The Sun-Herald on Friday that he was not ”thinking politically” when he made the remarks. It is politically suicidal to speak the truth. ”Rather than listen to what people say about the Koran I decided I would read it myself,” he said.

”It was nothing political. I didn’t think it would be used against me and people would accuse me of being racist.” But sadly we live in a world of bigots and ignoramuses who think Islam is a race and those who speak against this ideology of hate face discrimination and even prosecution.

Facing loss of job, Joseph Adams tried to retract and said, “’What I did was a mistake, I did not think it would be used for political purposes. In my mind I was living in a free society where we value free speech. Why should religion be a taboo subject?”

However, his mistake is to apologize. He should instead fight against being discriminated for speaking the truth. Apologies will only embolden Muslims and they don’t work. The Premier, Barry O’Farrell, did not agree with the apology. Late on Friday a government spokesman said in a statement: ”The comments were totally inappropriate and the staff member has already been terminated.”

Adams’ comments were truth. It is shameful for the O’Farrell to punish a man for speaking the truth. This is a blatant violation of human rights and the freedom of speech. It creates an atmosphere of terror in Australia where those who speak the truth fear doing so and those who promote hate and violence will be emboldened.

Mr O’Farrell won from Labor at the election in one of Sydney’s most multicultural electorates, with 60 per cent of constituents born overseas, primarily Muslims. The politicians who pander to Muslim vote are selling out their freedom for their own politial gain.

White House infiltrated by Muslim Brotherhood

Canadian anti-Islamist Muslim activist and author Tarek Fatah in a speech claimed that the White House of Obama has been infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood. Well, it's all too obvious.

---

This is a great speech that everyone should hear. Tarek Fatah is a Canadian-Pakistani Muslim writer who recently beat cancer. Says he:

"In the closing time that I have, I want you to focus - and I hope you can talk to your families and your friends and your neighbors - that when someone says that there is a penetration of jihadi Islamists within Canadian society, do not dismiss it as some right-wing, xenophobic, racist rant."

"Today, in the White House there are three members of the Muslim Brotherhood that influence Obama's policy."

What's the problem with the Muslim Brotherhood? In their own words:

"The Ikhwan [Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions." (Source: An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America)

It is not Islamaphobic

It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Jihad. Excerpts from the e-book, “Islam and Sharia Law Are Treason: Jihad Is Treason”, which can be downloaded from http://www.godofmoralperfection.org/p9.htm.

In order to immediately stop law abiding citizens from exercising their right of freedom of speech with regard to exposing the hateful, murderous reality that is Islam -- anyone who opposes Islam is branded an evil, racist, bigoted, Islamaphobic to intimidate and shut them up. (For 10 translations of these Quranic verses go to: (http://www.quranbrowser.com/ ). Use this web site throughout this book.

It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Jihad; there are 164 Quranic teachings of Jihad.

• JIHAD IS TREASON (Quran 29.6, 29.53, 22.52)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Pre-Pubescent Child Rape (65:4)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Rape (4.3)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Gang Rape (24:13)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Sex Slavery (4:24)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Torture (22.19-22)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Whipping (24.2)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Amputation and Crucifixion (5:33)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Beheading (8:12, 47:4)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Wife Beating (4:34)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Inferiority of Women (2.228, 4.11, 4.176)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Women as Sex Objects (2.223)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Murder (2:191, 9:5)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Killing kafirs (47.4)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Terrorizing kafirs (8.60, 3.151)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Immoral Paradise guaranteeing accession to Paradise for Muslim men who kill kafirs or who die in the process of trying to kill kafirs (9.111)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Massacre (8.67)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Genocide (8.17)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Theft and Robbery (Entire Chapter 8 called Booty)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of All other religions must submit to Islam (2.103, 2.286, 3.19, 48.16)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Your children are your enemies (9.23, 64.15)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Revenge (5.45)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Hate (5.60, 2.61)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Slavery (2.178)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Extortion (9:29)
• It is NOT ISLAMAPHOBIC to have a rational fear of Lying (3:28, 5:51)

What is following next in this book is such diabolical evil that you will immediately come down with the dreaded disease of ISLAMAPHOBIA for which the only cure is the Guts and Courage you will need to muster to stand up for democracy and oppose Islam.

In many EU countries it is hate speech to quote from the Quran punishable by large fines and/or jail. The UN is in the process of trying to pass hate speech laws that would criminalize any criticism of Islam worldwide. There have even been mutterings of passing such laws in the US. Islam is hate speech. Below is a very, very small, introductory sampling from the thousands of intolerant, hateful and violent passages inciting extermination, murder, torture, terrorism from the Quran/Hadith. If laws against “Hate speech”, blasphemy, etc. have any meaning today, they should be used against the Quran and Islam, or be entirely abolished. Go to: http://www.islamreform.net/new-page-132.htm