Allah: A Deadly Virus

Allah works like a deadly virus to the people it infects and there is finally hope for a lasting cure to it...

---

[Acknowledgement: The central theme of this article is taken from Darrel W. Ray's book The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture]

There are thousands of examples in popular science fictions of invading aliens taking over the mind and bodies of humans to further their own end. For example: Robert Heinlein's famous novel, The Puppet Masters and the movie by the same title (1994) directed by Stuart Orme, and also another movie Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) based on a novel The Body Snatchers by Jack Finney (Kay, 2008, p. 330). These two heart-pounding horror films often leave the audience wondering: where did science fiction get the idea?

But fiction such as these need not be stranger than truth. In the biology of pathogens, parasites and viruses, there are many examples of such infections. Certain parasites can literally take over critical mechanism of the host cells by reprogramming it the best interest of the parasite and to the determent of the host (Alford & Hill, 2000, p. 82).

In like manner, Muslim brains are infected by the deadly Allah virus. Parasitic viruses reprogram the host so as to replicate the virus. Similar, the Allah virus activates some programs in Muslims for its replication. Certain behaviors are programmed to ensure that the Allah virus is passed onto others specially their children (such programming is common to all religious cults, but not necessarily as deadly as in Islam today).

The prime infection strategy of the Allah virus, i.e. Islamization of the Muslim mind, starts from the birth and continues throughout his/her life. It is the most extensive brainwashing process a human can ever be subjected to. After birth, an adult holds the newborn and recites the azan (the call for prayers) directly into ears of the baby. This way, the newborn hears the blessed names of Allah and Muhammad before he hears anything else. As the child grows up, he reads and hears more about the Qur’an. He sees people performing prayers and walls are decorated with posters of Arabic calligraphy of some Qur’anic verses. He also hears the azan repeated five times a day in every mosque in the area. The call for prayers soon becomes the most frequently heard sound by him. His ears soon get used to hearing the endless recitations of the Qur’an that go on almost continuously.

If the child goes to Madrassah (Islamic school), further indoctrination continues. The fear of Allah, the hatred of Allah toward infidels, Muslims are best of people (Q: 3.110) and unbelievers are vilest of created beings (Q: 98.6), Paradise and Hell-fire etc. are systematically programmed into him. This is coupled with illogical thoughts and twisted logic to make the child to believe that Muhammad is the best man Allah ever created, or will ever create to the end of time and Allah (like the Big Brother) is watching every Muslim and he should behave strictly according to Allah’s will. The fear factor starts working and soon the innocent mind of the child gets the message that there is something very special about the Qur’an, which he is destined to read hundreds of times without ever understanding it and, except Allah no other God to be worshipped.

Once fully indoctrinated, the child fails in his ‘reality test’ – the ability to distinguish the actual from the imagined. Neither he can confront the truth nor can he admit it even to himself. His sick mind fervently believes in Allah’s mercy, power, hell, paradise etc. Slowly, Islam becomes his drug and Allah becomes his addiction. Without Islam, it is a world of black and white. With Islam it is a colorful show complete with drama, thrills, fun and excitement. Now he is in the mental prison of Allah. He simply cannot dare to cross the narrow limits specified by Allah. Now he can see things only through the lenses of Islam. This continues throughout his life.

A parasitic virus creates antibodies or strong defenses against other viruses (Sompayrac, 2002, p. 14). When Allah virus infects a person (a “host” in biological terms), it immediately begins creating “antibodies” against other competing religions. Any verbal denial of any principle of the Muslim belief is considered apostasy. Muslim nations have enacted laws to stop the conversion of Muslims to other religions. Allah instructed,

“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good)” (Q: 3.85)

“The Religion before Allah is Islam (submission to His Will)” (Q: 3.19).

“Whosoever disbelieves in Allah after believing except he who is forced while his heart remains in his belief but he who opens his chest for disbelief, shall receive the Anger of Allah and for such awaits a mighty punishment” (Q: 16.106).

“… take them (apostates) and kill them wherever you find them. Do not take them for guides or helpers” (Q: 4.89).

“Say: ‘Flight will not avail you (apostates), if you flee from death or slaughter, you would enjoy (this world) only for a little (time)’.” (Q: 33.15, 16)

The Allah virus ensures that Muslims get absolute immunity from other religions. In a society, where people of different race, color and religion live together, it is ever more important. Since the Allah virus cannot control the Muslims from coming in contact in their day-to-day life, it takes preventive measures to keep Muslims blind and unreceptive to other human beings. Allah has isolated Muslims from the rest of humanity by dividing the Humankind into two perpetually hostile groups Dar al-Islam (the house of Islam), and Dar al-harb (the house of war), i.e., Muslims and Kafirs, and has implanted the concept of jihad or permanent war in the Muslim mind. Deprived of contact with others and starved for human interactions, Muslims bond with their predator. The more helpless a Muslim is; the more is he dependant on the Allah virus.

The Allah virus specifically targets the brain, causing abnormalities in mental functions of the individual, but it remains undetectable by the victim. When a healthy human being is infected by the Allah virus, his attitude towards others and worldview changes dramatically. He, willingly and submissively, self-denigrates to become a partner of Arab imperialism.

This tendency has a devastating affect on the national character of the non-Arab Muslims. When a non-Arab person accepts Islam, he is forced to love Arabia and its traditions at the expense of the culture, honor and pride of his own motherland. Mecca is now more favorite than his birthplace, Arabic more than his mother tongue and the Arab heroes more than the heroes of his nation. Since Allah hates the infidels, a non-Arab Muslim must hate the infidel peoples of even his ancestral origins. Some viruses take over the machinery of the cell for its own purposes and kill it (The world book encyclopedia, 2005, p. 335). In Egypt, the glorious land of ancient Pharaohs; the people don’t call themselves Egyptians any more. All of them had become Arabs. Naipaul (1998, p. 1) wrote,

“Islam is not simply a matter of conscience or private belief. It makes imperial demands. A convert’s worldview alters. His holy places are in Arab lands. His sacred language is Arabic. His idea of history alters. He rejects his own: he becomes, whether he likes it or not, a part of the Arab story. The convert has to turn away from everything that is his. The disturbance for societies is immense, and even after a thousand years can remain unsolved. The turning away has to be done again and again. People develop fantasies about who and what they are.”

In sum, the Allah virus grooms the Muslim minds in such a way that they become lifelong slaves of Arabs. They can’t apply minimum logic and reason to discover the true nature of Islam. Their definitions of ‘good’ and ‘bad’, ‘right’ and ‘wrong’, and ‘logical’ and ‘illogical’ are reversed. A Muslim can spend his entire life studying the Qur’an, Ahadith and Muhammad’s biography, but he will never detect a single error in the Qur’an (despite its abundance), though he will easily find similar errors in other scriptures. He will never notice that Muhammad was a criminal, a liar, a pedophile, a shameless womanizer, a mass murderer and a ruthless tyrant, though minor character-flaws of some Catholic Priests and their sex-scandals will never go unnoticed to them. Even if the contradictions of the Qur’an or Muhammad’s flawed character is pointed out, his reprogrammed crippled mind will try to camouflage them. All the contradictions and errors will appear as clear proofs of its divinity. They will ‘sincerely’ deceive themselves into believing that non-Muslims either know that Islam is truth and reject is out of pure unreasonableness or else are simply ignorant of it. As Ray (2009, p. 25) commented,

“Once infected, the individual cannot detect major contradiction in his beliefs and behavior. Belief systems become self-evident to him and no amount of logical discourse will move him from his belief.”

When the parasitic Allah virus takes over some functions of the Muslim mind, it modifies them like aliens snatch the bodies of the victims by controlling their minds. This is the time Muslims fail the "reality test". From the very bottom of their heart, they know that hatred towards a fellow human being is wrong, but still they have to ‘sincerely’ hate the nonbelievers because Allah wants them to hate. Today Jews and Christians are the most advanced people in the world in every field and Muslims are at the bottom. But they have to ‘sincerely’ believe that monkeys and pigs are descendent of Jews and Christians because Allah wants them to believe so. The Pakistani, Afghan, Bangladeshi and Indian Muslims immensely hate their Hindu counterparts. They understand very well that their forefathers were forced to accept Islam by the sword and deception. Every subcontinent Muslim is descendant of their Hindu ancestors. Still, they will have to ‘sincerely’ hate the Hindus, because it pleases Allah. Today, such self-contradictions are much less prevalent in others religion.

The parasitic viruses use specific methods for spreading the virus. In biology, pathogens use specific vehicles, called "vector", for infection. Mosquitoes, for example, act as a vector for malarial parasites. The Imams, Mullahs, Moulavis, Ulemas and Islamic preachers (e.g. Zakir Naik) act as the vector for the Allah virus that causes the Islam disease. The Clerics infuse the Allah virus into normal human beings and reprogram them to become Muslim and the effective careers of the Allah virus. The Arabs and other Islamic nations spend billions to help the parasitic Allah virus survive and propagate through Jihadi terrorism or holy war in the name of Allah. To ensure its own survival, Allah instructed,

“Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” (Q: 9. 41)

“Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” (Q: 9. 20)

“O ye who believe! Shall I show you a commerce that will save you from a painful doom? Ye should believe in Allah and His messenger, and should strive for the cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives. That is better for you, if ye did but know.” (Q: 61.10,11).

“The (true) believers are only those who . . . strive with their wealth and their lives for the cause of Allah.” (Q: 49.15)

“… Pay the zakat. Those saved from covetousness prosper. If you loan to Allah a beautiful loan, He will double it. He will grant Forgiveness: for Allah is most ready to appreciate” (Q: 64.16).

Some vectors can actually be more efficient when dead. Just as the rabies virus takes over the brain of the raccoon and reprograms it to bite other animals – even at the cost of its own life – the Allah virus directs few programmed Muslims to go on suicide mission to propagate the cause of Allah. No doubt, a suicide is the ultimate act which ends the person, but when a bomber kills himself in the name of Allah, Allah’s religion gets a powerful tool for propagation. Sometimes the vectors fail. Today we can see that many hardcore Islamic terrorists and radical Imams have left Islam.

Islam is a painful mental disease. When the Allah virus infects a person, most of the mental functions -- logic, reason, study, learning and critical thinking, creative imagination etc. -- are disabled. Therefore, despite having a fully functioning brain, Muslims cannot prosper. The Allah virus originated from Mecca and it keeps the infected persons focused on Mecca through rituals and actions that reinforce their faith on a daily basis.

Biological viruses mutate. When Allah virus mutates, Islam divides into different sects – Sunni, Shia, Sufi etc. While many such mutations work to the interest of the virus, occasionally some mutations go out of control and turn fatal for its survival. Such mutations lead to the emergence of ex-Muslims and freethinkers of Islam, in whom the Allah virus have become totally nonfunctional.

Fatal mutations also give clues and hopes to victims, namely humans in the case of Allah virus, for a cure of the virus. So when Jihadi Muslims, those infected with the most virulent strain of the Allah virus, are busy in shedding the blood of innocent people all over the world, these ex-Muslims are offering humanity rays of hope. These ex-Muslims are not only completely cured of the Islam diseases, but also have grown complete resistance against the Allah virus. Their fully re-activated brains also understand the working of how Allah virus works. When one knows the working mechanism of a virus, he/she can offer solution to the diseases it causes. And many ex-Muslims are doing exactly that by attacking the core of virus through websites, blogs, media and books.

Today, the Allah virus is under threat from many sides. The ex-Muslim and freethinking websites are not only immunizing potential victims to infection by it, but are also awakening Muslims to fight back the killer virus residing inside them. Advancement and new developments in medical technology is critical to develop cure to age-old deadly diseases. In the case of Allah virus, recent developments in communication technology, particularly satellite television and the Internet, which are reaching the remotest harems of Islamic nations, are offering such technological advancements to facilitate the remedy of the Allah virus by offering profoundly altered mental climate to Muslim people.

Another threat of Allah virus is the continual march of science. Yet another threat is the Psychology. Many psychologists can clearly see what Islam does to Muslims; how it destroys healthy relationships and families, forces people into self-defeating beliefs and generates unjustified hatred.

Religion is a major contributor to mental illness. But Islam, by itself, is an edifice of mental illness. Like the deadly smallpox virus was eradicated in the 1970s, the Allah virus, humanity’s worst scourge, must be completely eliminated from the earth. Otherwise, the new deadly strains it has developed will easily take us back to Stone Age. And all the signs at this hour point to a victory for humanity in this lasting battle.

References

1. Alford, Diane and Hill, Jennifer (2008); Excel HSC biology, Pascal Press, Sydney.

2. Kay, Glenn (2008); Zombie Movies: The Ultimate Guide. Chicago Review Press. USA.

3. Naipaul, V. S (1998); Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions Among the Converted People, Abacus. London.

4. Ray, Darrel W. (2009): The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture. IPC Press, Bonner Springs, Kansas.

5. Sompayrac, Lauren (2002); How pathogenic viruses work. Jones and Barelett Publishers. Sudbury. USA.

6. The world book encyclopedia (2005), Volume 5, World Book, Inc.

Time To Unmask Muhammad

To know why Islam is a mortal danger one must not only consider the Koran but also the character of Muhammad, who conceived the Koran and the entirety of Islam.

---

The Koran is not just a book. Muslims believe that Allah himself wrote it and that it was dictated to Muhammad in the original version, the Umm al-Kitab, which is kept on a table in heaven. Consequently one cannot argue with the contents. Who would dare to disagree with what Allah himself has written? This explains much of Muhammadan behaviour, from the violence of jihad to the hatred and persecution of Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims and apostates. What we in the West regard as abnormal, is perfectly normal for Islam.

A second insuperable problem with Islam is the figure of Muhammad. He is not just anyone. He is al-insan al-kamil, the perfect man. To become a Muslim one must pronounce the Shahada (the Muslim creed). By pronouncing the Shahada one testifies that there is no god that can be worshipped except Allah, and one testifies that Muhammad is his servant and messenger.

The Koran, and hence Allah, lays down that Muhammad’s life must be imitated. The consequences of this are horrendous and can be witnessed on a daily basis.

There has been much analysis of Muhammad’s mental sanity. In spite of all the available research, it is rarely mentioned or debated. It is a taboo to discuss the true nature of the man whom one and a half billion Muslims around the world regard as a holy prophet and example to be followed. That taboo must be breached in the West, and here in the Netherlands.

Ali Sina is an Iranian ex-Muslim who established the organisation for apostates of Islam Faith Freedom International. In his latest book he posits that Muhammad is a narcissist, a paedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, a madman, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter. Sina has offered 50,000 dollars for the one who can prove otherwise. Nobody has claimed the reward as yet. And no wonder, as the description is based on the Islamic texts themselves, such as the hadiths, the descriptions of Muhammad’s life from testimonies of contemporaries.

The historical Muhammad was the savage leader of a gang of robbers from Medina. Without scruples they looted, raped and murdered. The sources describe orgies of savagery where hundreds of people’s throats were cut, hands and feet chopped off, eyes cut out, entire tribes massacred. An example is the extinction of the jewish Kurayza tribe in Medina in 627. One of those who chopped off their heads was Muhammad. The women and children were sold as slaves. Confronted with the lunacy of Islamic terrorists today, it is not hard to find out where the lunacy comes from.

In Vienna the women’s rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was recently sentenced to paying a fine for insulting a religion by calling Muhammad a paedophile. However, that is the truth. Numerous hadiths contain testimonies by Muhammad’s favourite wife, the child wife Aisha. Aisha literally says: “The prophet married me when I was six years old, and had intercourse with me when I was nine.”

According to the historian Theophanes (752-817) Muhammad was an epileptic. Epileptic crises are sometimes accompanied by hallucinations, perspiration form the forehead and foaming at the mouth, the very symptoms which Muhammad displayed during his visions.

In his book "The other Muhammad" (1992) the Flemish psychologist dr. Herman Somers concludes that in his forties the “prophet” began to suffer from acromegaly, a condition caused by a tumor in the pituitary gland, a small organ that is situated just below the brain. When the tumor in the pituitary gland causes too much pressure in the brain, people start to see and hear things that are not there. Somers’s psychopathological diagnosis of Muhammad’s condition is: organic hallucinatory affliction with paranoid characteristics.

The German medical historian Armin Geus speaks of a paranoid hallucinatory schizophrenia. A similar analysis can be found in the book “The Medical Case of Muhammad” by the physician Dede Korkut.

In his book "Psychology of Mohammed: Inside the Brain of a Prophet", Dr. Masud Ansari calls Muhammad “the perfect personification of a psychopath in power.” Muhammad had a unhinged paranoid personality with an inferiority complex and megalomaniac tendencies. In his forties he starts having visions that lead him to believe he has a cosmic mission, and there is no stopping him.

The truth is not always pleasant or politically correct. On the basis of the research referred to above it can be argued that the Islamic creed obliges one and a half billion people around the world, including the one million living in the Netherlands, to take Muhammad as their example. There is no turning back once one has become a Muslim. For even though article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that every person has the right to “change his religion or belief,” in Islam there is a death penalty for leaving the faith.

Anyone who voices criticism of Islam and Muhammad is in grave personal danger – as I have experienced. And whoever attempts to escape from the influence of Islam and Muhammad risks death. We cannot continue to accept this state of affairs. A public debate about the true nature and character of Muhammad can provide insight and support to Muslims all over the world who wish to leave Islam.

Apostates are heroes and more than ever they deserve the support of freedom loving people all over the world. Party politics should not be at play in this matter. It is time for us to help these people by exposing Muhammad.

Who Is Allah?

Europeans love to mock the salience of religion in American society, but they won't be laughing for very long. The de-Christianization of Europe in the name of "tolerance" is rapidly driving the spiritually shiftless continent into the arms of Islam. And now, amidst the postmodern theological confusion that defines contemporary Europe, even Catholic clergy are jumping on the Islamomania bandwagon.

The latest post-Christian theological spectacle comes to us from the Netherlands (of Ayaan Hirsi Ali fame), where the Roman Catholic Bishop of Breda, Tiny Muskens, says he wants Christians to start calling God "Allah" because he believes such a gesture would promote "rapprochement between Christianity and Islam". Appearing on Dutch television, the 71-year-old cleric said:

"Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn't we all say that from now on we will name God Allah? ... What does God care what we call him?"

Inquiring minds want to know: If the bishop really thinks the names "God" and "Allah" are interchangeable, why doesn't he ask Muslims to start calling Allah "Yahweh", the biblical name for God? But he won't, because he knows they won't.

Indeed, just because Christianity, Judaism and Islam are called "monotheistic" faiths, it does not follow that Christians, Jews and Muslims pray to the same God. So for those pre-postmoderns who believe that words still mean something, a quick survey of archaeology, history and theology-accompanied by a dose of common sense-can answer the question of whether the Allah of Islam is really the God of the Bible.

What Archaeology Says about Allah

Muslims claim that in pre-Islamic times, "Allah" was the biblical God of the Patriarchs, prophets and apostles. Indeed, the credibility of Islam as a religion stands or falls on its core claim of historical continuity with Judaism and Christianity. No wonder, then, that many Muslims get uppity when the claims of Islam are subjected to the hard science of archaeology.

Because archaeology provides irrefutable evidence that Allah, far from being the biblical God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, was actually the pre-Islamic pagan moon-god. Indeed, it is an established archaeological fact that worship of the moon-god was the main religion of the ancient Middle East.

But what about the Arabian Peninsula, where Mohammed (570-632) launched Islam? During the last two centuries, prominent archaeologists have unearthed thousands of inscriptions which prove beyond any doubt that the dominant religion of Arabia during Mohammed's day was the cult of the moon-god.

In fact, for generations before Mohammed was born, the Arabs worshipped some 360 pagan gods housed at a stone temple in Mecca called the Kabah. According to archaeologists, the chief deity of Mecca was the moon-god called al-ilah (meaning the god or the idol), which was shortened to Allah in pre-Islamic times. Pagan Arabs even used Allah in the names they gave themselves: Mohammed's father (Abdallah), for example, had Allah as part of his name.

What History Says about Allah

Historians say that pre-Islamic Arabs worshipped the moon-god by bowing in prayer toward Mecca several times a day. They would also make a pilgrimage to Mecca, run around the Kabah seven times and throw stones at the devil. And they fasted for one month, which began with the appearance of the crescent moon and ended when the crescent moon reappeared.

These same rites form the core of Islam today: Muslims bow in prayer toward Mecca; they make a pilgrimage to Mecca and run around the Kabah seven times; and they still throw stones at the devil. They also observe the fast of Ramadan, which begins and ends with the crescent moon.

Moreover, the ancient symbol of the pagan moon-god, the crescent moon, is the official symbol of Islam; it appears on the flags of Muslim countries, as well as on the tops of mosques and minarets everywhere.

Historians say that Mohammed, who as a traveling trader was exposed to Judaism and Christianity during his visits to different parts of the Middle East, tried to mimic those monotheistic faiths by taking Allah, the main deity within the Arabian pantheon, and making it the only god. Indeed, the basic confession of Islam is not that "Allah is Great" but that "Allah is Greater". Greater than all the other idols, that is.

But Islam also draws from other pagan traditions. For example, the tale of Mohammed's night journey into heaven parallels the Zoroastrian story of Arta Viraf. Zoroastrianism also inspired the Islamic belief that dark-eyed virgins await every man who enters heaven. And the Islamic ritual of praying five times a day? That, historians say, originates with the Sabeans, Syrian pagans who practiced an ecumenical mixture of Babylonian and Hellenic religion.

No surprise, then, that some scholars refer to Islam as monotheistic heathenism.

What Theology Says about Allah

Muslims claim that Islam is Judaism and Christianity reformed. They say the Koran confirms the truth of the Torah and the Gospels. But since those texts did not jibe with Mohammad's beliefs, they accuse Jews and Christians of changing and distorting the original versions. Muslims therefore assert that the Koran "clarifies" the Bible.

Even if that were the case, the Koran and the Bible present ideas about God (especially about His character) that are so diametrically opposed that any reasonable observer would conclude that each book refers to a distinct deity.

The Koran, for example, states unequivocally that Allah is an unknowable and non-personal deity. By contrast, the God of the Bible allows Himself to be known and desires fellowship with human beings on a personal basis. Indeed, the Bible says that Abraham (the same Abraham whom Muslims say they venerate) was the "friend of God."

The Koran also portrays Allah as a vindictive deity who hates sinners and desires to afflict them. But the Bible says God is love.

Moreover, the New Testament teaches that God loved humanity so much that He came to earth to pay the debt for man's sin, and that that act of grace is available for free to anyone who believes Jesus Christ is their personal Savior. But Islam denies that Christ was God or that He died in order to save humanity. Indeed, Allah does not provide any way for man to be reconciled to God.

And the theological differences go on and on, so much so that the God of the Bible cannot possibly be the Allah worshipped in Islam. Unless, of course, a Dutch bishop says so.

Allah and Eurabia

Mohammed thought the Jews and Christians of his day would receive him as a prophet. But the Bible says that any new revelation must agree with what is already established in Scripture (Isaiah 8:20). So they rejected his Allah as a false god. And Mohammed replied by setting his Islam on a permanent warpath against Judaism and Christianity that continues to this day.

The Dutch bishop and other Muslim fellow travelers think they can buy a fake peace with Islam by playing relativistic word games as a part of an "inter-faith" dialogue. But Muslims understand much better than do post-modern Europeans that ecumenical appeasement is a symptom of a Judeo-Christian civilization that is weak and dying.

The irony is that the real danger from Islam stems not so much from ordinary Muslims as it does from sickly Europeans who have subverted their Judeo-Christian heritage in search of secular hedonism. Because they live only for the moment, they are willing submit to anything, including Islam, as long as it doesn't interfere with the pursuit of pleasure today.

It has been more than 50 years since the late Christian apologist C.S. Lewis first warned about Western Civilization's disastrous lurch into post-Christianity. But even he would be surprised to see how quickly Islam is filling the religious and cultural vacuum that is post-Christian Europe.

It's not that Europeans haven't been forewarned. It's that they couldn't care less.

Free Speech Campaign: “Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”

Freedom of speech cannot be granted. It can only be taken. Take it now!

Attributes of Allah - The Most Imaginary

Imagine there is this benevolent God, who created us out of nothing, provided us with everything and delivered us from punishment. Yes, just imagine and leave it at that.

Allah is the Batin, as claimed by Muhammad in his book, the Qur’an. He is hidden, unseen and any glimpse that you will ever have of him is through imagination. Any claim of proof in Qur’an by no means shows any solid evidence. Repeating verse by verse, asserting how the pondering over the creation would show us how real Allah is. We have pondered and we have searched. We see no proof of Allah - unless we imagine it?
Allah is just a concept, like all those Gods, who live in the thoughts of their believers, which is just but a figment of your imagination! A figment of imagination that was brought down generations to you, and now you dwell in the horrors unimaginable that could befall upon you and everyone around you, should you stop imagining. So imagine that there is this cruel beast, called Allah, who enjoys the violent murdering and sadistic suffering of human beings. Grow out of your childhood imaginations and those that you were forced to imagine; and realize the reality that you are shielded from.

The following is a joint project initiated by Gates of Vienna. Please grab the image from this post below, and use.

Text below is from GOV

An EDL protester was recently fined £200 for “making offensive comments about Allah” during a demonstration in Leicester. Even though police officers and the EDL were the only ones able to hear what he said, the prosecution said people were “likely to be offended” and the police were “likely to have been alarmed”. His words were considered “threatening, abusive or insulting” and likely to cause “harassment, alarm or distress”. The convicted man said he did not think he would offend anyone. But suppose he had intended offense? Why is that a legal issue? Why is offending someone the sole basis for prosecution in countries that supposedly uphold civil liberties for their citizens?

Vlad Tepes and gates of vienna discussed the issue for a while and devised the following response: This became a Vlad-Baron joint venture, with Vlad doing the video and the talking, and GOV doing the image and the spelling — a win-win for everyone.

“Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”

We are launching a new protest campaign that aims to drive a wedge into the thin crack between leftists and the Muslims. We’re going to do this with this image [point at it], and the slogan: “Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”. We aim for protesters to get arrested for having a picture that shows Muhammad talking to a giant bunny. In fact, participants must insist on being arrested, and on being tried. By doing this we proclaim our fundamental rights, which were not granted to us, but were always ours, and are only now being taken away by the tyranny of state power.

These rights include the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the freedom of religion — including the right to have no religion at all.

We will go to jail for saying that Allah is imaginary.

We will say nothing about Muslims being violent.

We will say nothing insulting at all, only that their god is imaginary. If someone chooses to be insulted by this, that is his/her decision.

Any atheist [Kafir] has the right to say what we say. It is one of our fundamental freedoms Vlad suggests that people download the image from his site and make T-shirts for themselves and friends, for placards, signs, posters, etc. At demonstrations, participants should chant the slogan while waving a card or sign. And everyone should stick to the slogan, and not be sidetracked into calling Muslims “thugs” and so on, because that just supports the idea that we are evil insulting people. Stick to message, and go to jail for saying that Allah is imaginary.

Simple, yet effective!

Even the most diehard leftists will choke hard when they are forced to condemn us as “racists”. Muslims will be offended, of course, and that will serve as grounds for our arrest. This will only serve to emphasize that all speech that does not agree with the Koran and the hadith and the sunna of the prophet is offensive to Muslims, and must be prohibited. And the fact that our governments prohibit it means that they are enforcing full shari’ah upon everyone, not just on Muslims alone! Which is a violation of our rights, the same rights that our government claims to protect when they arrest us for saying that Allah is Mohammed’s imaginary friend…?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq5qNTcctwc&feature=player_embedded

Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend

Freedom of speech cannot be granted. It can only be taken. Take it now!

Attributes of Allah - The Most Imaginary

Imagine there is this benevolent God, who created us out of nothing, provided us with everything and delivered us from punishment. Yes, just imagine and leave it at that.

Allah is the Batin, as claimed by Muhammad in his book, the Qur’an. He is hidden, unseen and any glimpse that you will ever have of him is through imagination. Any claim of proof in Qur’an by no means shows any solid evidence. Repeating verse by verse, asserting how the pondering over the creation would show us how real Allah is. We have pondered and we have searched. We see no proof of Allah - unless we imagine it?
Allah is just a concept, like all those Gods, who live in the thoughts of their believers, which is just but a figment of your imagination! A figment of imagination that was brought down generations to you, and now you dwell in the horrors unimaginable that could befall upon you and everyone around you, should you stop imagining. So imagine that there is this cruel beast, called Allah, who enjoys the violent murdering and sadistic suffering of human beings. Grow out of your childhood imaginations and those that you were forced to imagine; and realize the reality that you are shielded from.

The following is a joint project initiated by Gates of Vienna. Please grab the image from this post below, and use.

Text below is from GOV

An EDL protester was recently fined £200 for “making offensive comments about Allah” during a demonstration in Leicester. Even though police officers and the EDL were the only ones able to hear what he said, the prosecution said people were “likely to be offended” and the police were “likely to have been alarmed”. His words were considered “threatening, abusive or insulting” and likely to cause “harassment, alarm or distress”. The convicted man said he did not think he would offend anyone. But suppose he had intended offense? Why is that a legal issue? Why is offending someone the sole basis for prosecution in countries that supposedly uphold civil liberties for their citizens?

Vlad Tepes and gates of vienna discussed the issue for a while and devised the following response: This became a Vlad-Baron joint venture, with Vlad doing the video and the talking, and GOV doing the image and the spelling — a win-win for everyone.

“Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”

We are launching a new protest campaign that aims to drive a wedge into the thin crack between leftists and the Muslims. We’re going to do this with this image [point at it], and the slogan: “Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”. We aim for protesters to get arrested for having a picture that shows Muhammad talking to a giant bunny. In fact, participants must insist on being arrested, and on being tried. By doing this we proclaim our fundamental rights, which were not granted to us, but were always ours, and are only now being taken away by the tyranny of state power.

These rights include the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the freedom of religion — including the right to have no religion at all.

We will go to jail for saying that Allah is imaginary.

We will say nothing about Muslims being violent.

We will say nothing insulting at all, only that their god is imaginary. If someone chooses to be insulted by this, that is his/her decision.

Any atheist [Kafir] has the right to say what we say. It is one of our fundamental freedoms Vlad suggests that people download the image from his site and make T-shirts for themselves and friends, for placards, signs, posters, etc. At demonstrations, participants should chant the slogan while waving a card or sign. And everyone should stick to the slogan, and not be sidetracked into calling Muslims “thugs” and so on, because that just supports the idea that we are evil insulting people. Stick to message, and go to jail for saying that Allah is imaginary.

Simple, yet effective!

Even the most diehard leftists will choke hard when they are forced to condemn us as “racists”. Muslims will be offended, of course, and that will serve as grounds for our arrest. This will only serve to emphasize that all speech that does not agree with the Koran and the hadith and the sunna of the prophet is offensive to Muslims, and must be prohibited. And the fact that our governments prohibit it means that they are enforcing full shari’ah upon everyone, not just on Muslims alone! Which is a violation of our rights, the same rights that our government claims to protect when they arrest us for saying that Allah is Mohammed’s imaginary friend…?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq5qNTcctwc&feature=player_embedded

Speed of Light in the Quran and the Lies of Allah and Muhammad

Another Quranic science and how baseless and absurd it is!

---

The speed of light is a scientific discovery by humans after long and exhausting research, which revealed that it is the fastest thing in the universe, traveling at approximately 186,282 miles per second. Its astonishing speed has marveled many astronomers, cosmicists, mathematicians and philosophers throughout history.

It is important to note that light travels at a speed of 186,282 miles/second through vacuum. If light passes through water, its speed is measured at 140,000 miles/second, 124,000 miles/second through glass, and 77,500 miles/seconds through diamond.

The theory of relativity explains that when an object starts to move, the time become slower and when it reaches the speed of the light, the time almost stops for it. Its equation is very famous: E = mc².

Historical facts show us that research about the light is not merely 400 or 500 years old, but much older. Man has tried to understand the laws of light even before Common Era. Ancient Greek philosophers Empedocles (490-430 BCE), Aristotle (383-321 BCE) and Euclid (300- BCE) did valuable research into the properties of light and vision.

Muhammad's Night Journey (Mi’raj)

It is also a very popular event in Islamic history that Muslims believe Muhammad, the founder of Islam, set off on a flying horse (buraq) from the Kaaba to Baitul Maqdas; then from Baitul Maqdas, he ascended to seven skies, where he met famous earlier prophets; and finally he met with Allah on His Arsh, the throne of Allah. When he came back from that celestial journey, he found his bed was still warm.

Many Hadiths have been recorded for this incident to enhance the popularity and fame of Muhammad by boasting and exaggerating. About the event, the Quran has says:

Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things) [Quran 17:1]

Allah's words in the Quran regarding Muhammad's Mi'raj in the above verse does not explain what happened after Muhammad visited the farthest Mosque, i.e. masjid-ul-Aqsa, and stopped there. How Allah can stop mentioning in the Quran about the event of Mi'raj, highly regarded by every Muslim? Even Muslim scholars cannot answer this question. It seems that the prominent Muslim biographers of Muhammad, who wrote Islamic histories and the Sunnah, were more informed than Allah.

Hadiths had, no doubt, earned a lot of praise and admiration from their contemporaries for skillfully adding lies and fabricated stories -- all attributed to their master, Muhammad.

It's notable that whether the ascension of Muhammad to Allah's Arsh was in physical or spiritual form is also an issue of controversy amongst Muslims. Some Muslims believe he just dreamt, some believe that he went in spiritual form, but most believe he went on Miraj in physical form.

Propaganda of the Quran and Muslims

Today, misperception has grown widely amongst Muslims about the Quran and its soi-disant (questionable) miracles. Many Muslims, who acquire better education in Western countries, are struggling hard to prove that the Quran is miraculous. They try to put forward various irrational reasons and claim that lunar calendar 12,000 lunar orbits/earth day assumed as the speed of light.

Islamic Education society propagates that the ‘speed of light’ is mentioned in the Quran. They have gathered this idea from Quran 32:5:

He arranges [each] matter from the heaven to the earth; then it will ascend to Him in a Day, the extent of which is a thousand (1,000) years of those which you count.

Muslim scholars believe that this verse is a hint about the speed of light, which was mentioned 1,400 years ago.

There is another verse in the same Quran, which differs from the verse cited above (Quran 70:4):

(Whereby) the angels and the Spirit ascend unto Him in a Day whereof the span is fifty thousand years.

There is a clear contradiction between these two verses. But the core of this article, however, is not to discuss these contradictions, but to prove that Allah lied and miscalculated in the verse, which puts his one day with our 1,000 years.

It proves that Allah and his angels are so slothful that it takes one day for them to cover our affairs, while it takes one thousand years on earth.

Now pay attention to this: Muhammad said that he was escorted from Kaaba to Baitul Maqdis and from there he ascended to seven skies and when he comes back, he found his bed still warm. Now, Allah says that his one day’s affairs are equal to our 1,000 years, and Muhammad, a human, says that he returned back from visiting Allah and other prophets within a short moment. Who is lying here?

Wisdom would tell us that both Allah and Muhammad are lying. Let me explain why.

If we focus on the theory of relativity, which says an object that moves with the speed of light, the time almost comes to a standstill for it. First, Allah obviously lost his/her mind completely and said things contradictory to what the theory of relativity says. Second, if Muhammad, the founder of Islam, had have visited Allah in his/her Arsh, 1,000 years must have passed by on the earth by the time he returned. Therefore, amongst those people Muhammad landed after the visit to heaven would be alien or unknown to Muhammad; he would have been amongst the people, belonging to the era of 1,000 years later than that of Muhammad’s time (i.e. 620-21 C.E.).

In the words of Hadith compilers, Muhammad lied in claiming that the distance between earth and first heaven is 500 years, then from the first heaven to the next heaven is also 500 years; this calculation keeps repeating till the final heaven and the Arsh of Allah.

Very interestingly, many Muslims on the internet are now at pain, because the distance between the earth and heaven can’t be 500 years. So, they are calling these hadiths zaeef (unauthentic, week). These Hadiths are recorded by:

Abu Dawood, Book 40, number 4723, Sunan Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah 173.

To my utmost delight, when I tried to search this hadiths in Abu Dawood Book 40, number 4723, this hadith has been skipped from his collection. Readers can personally see that hadiths number 4723 has been missing by visiting this link.

And elsewhere, Muslims are hilariously arguing with each other about whether or not the earth is 500 years away from heaven, as prophesied by their master Muhammad -- who is highly esteemed and equivalent to Allah. Read the discussion here: http://www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vbe/showthread.php?t=8806

Why 1,000 years?

In olden days, thousand years were considered a very big span. When someone thought about 1,000 years, they immediately thought of the Qayamah, the Day of Judgment. There were millenarians, who thought that the Judgment day will appear after a thousand years; they couldn’t contemplate or perceive what could happen after this long period of time. Even there were millenarian Christians, who thought that Armageddon come a thousand years after Jesus; so, thousands of them from Europe travelled to Palestine, the Holy Land, in the year 1,000 after Jesus to enjoy a blessed end of the world. Thus, Muhammad and his Allah decided to add some thrill to their verses in order to show that the affairs of Allah are so fast (in their miscalculation) that it would be beyond human imagination. He sends his affairs down from skies to earth and then lift up them back in one day, which amount to 1,000 years of the human calendar.

Islamic Wife Beating : The Rules of Allah

Quranic command for the Islamic wife-beating and renowned Islamic scholars' explanation on how to do it...

---

"I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is: I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute." --- Rebecca West (‘Mr Chesterton in Hysterics: A Study in Prejudice,’ The Clarion, 14 Nov 1913, reprinted in The Young Rebecca, 1982)

This article is meant to be offensive to the believers of Allah, but I found it educational for understanding the depth of the Islamic religious basis for the status of women in the Islamic society.

Joseph Conrad said: "Being a woman is a terribly difficult task, since it consists principally in dealing with men..."

As far as I am aware of, there are no similar religious teachings in Christianity, Buddhism, or any other major religions of the world. Please correct me if I am wrong on this.

Moreover, Muslims in general may not bat an eye towards this philosophy, because it is too deeply ingrained into their culture to be noticed; but I have to wonder how this edict works in the good old U.S.A, where spousal abuse is a crime and can land a man/husband in jail.

The Qur’an instructs Muslim men to beat their wives

Surah 4:34:

“Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely Allah is high, supreme.”

Extending on Allah's command to men for beating their wives, here is a Muslim cleric expounding on the proper way of beating a Muslim wife. I find it interesting that at one point, the Maulana says “…she is not his merchandise…”, yet no one seems to see the hypocrisy in one human beating another – whom they “not own” [to exert control].

Then again, perhaps he is simply wrong to have said that, and the woman is indeed the husband’s merchandise.

In Arabic and in the three other reliable English Qur’anic translations:

ٱلرِّجَالُ قَوَّٲمُونَ عَلَى ٱلنِّسَآءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ ٱللَّهُ بَعۡضَهُمۡ عَلَىٰ بَعۡضٍ۬ وَبِمَآ أَنفَقُواْ مِنۡ أَمۡوَٲلِهِمۡ‌ۚ فَٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتُ قَـٰنِتَـٰتٌ حَـٰفِظَـٰتٌ۬ لِّلۡغَيۡبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ ٱللَّهُ‌ۚ وَٱلَّـٰتِى تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ

فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَٱهۡجُرُوهُنَّ فِى ٱلۡمَضَاجِعِ وَٱضۡرِبُوهُنَّ‌ۖ فَإِنۡ أَطَعۡنَڪُمۡ فَلَا تَبۡغُواْ عَلَيۡہِنَّ سَبِيلاً‌ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّ۬ا ڪَبِيرً۬ا (٣٤)

• YUSUFALI: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore, the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husbands) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all).

• PICKTHAL: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great.

• SHAKIR: Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.

Truth about Islamic wife beating

Man is the absolute master in the Muslim household and beating your wife is definitely allowed in Islam. It should not be as severe as beating your slave. That is all! You can beat your wife (lovingly!) pretty good! Make it count, but take care not to break her bones! If you do, she may be able to leave and get a divorce. Therefore, bruising, blue marks, red marks, etc., are all okay! In fact, it is preferred to use a stick or a whip to beat your wife with (easier than using your hand, that’s for sure.). This is what I deduced from an honest reading of the Quran and the Hadith about wife beating. What can I say? The Islamic teachings on women are EVIL. It is hard not see Evil in, no matter what Qur’anic subject you research.

More Islamic Wife-Beating Justifications

Here is a video of a Muslim cleric, who gave a lecture on the proper way of beating women. Moreover, we are often reminded of the true tragedies of Muslim spousal abuses with this film of a man actually beating his wife. Well, thanks to people on YouTube again we have this follow-up lecture from another Muslim “holy” man, explaining with amazingly twisted logics why women do, indeed, need to be beaten!

"No one should deny this because this was permitted by the Creator of Man".

Oh yeah? Well, the creator, I believe in, says, I can shoot you in the face. What do you think of that?

I also love the way he makes claims about how many domestic disturbance calls there are in “infidel” countries – as if that makes it OK! Besides, when he is talking about all the beatings in the U.S., I wonder how many are Muslim. Obviously, those would not even count!

So let me get this straight: when you get an electric car, you get a manual; and when you get a Muslim wife, you get the Qur’an. So, like … the Muslim wife is basically a glorified car, an object you can treat however you want to…

I think this person is reading his Qur’an a bit selectively, am I wrong on this? Blah!!

Yes, a Muslim woman is really like an object or Islamic merchandise. I would like to invite you to watch those two Saudi chicks: “I nearly fell out of my chair watching those two Muslim women try to eat spaghetti with that mask on their face! Terrible, and hilarious at the same time.”

How to Beat Your Islamic Wife into Submission - More Rules!

I would like to remind all women, that if your Muslim husband/boyfriend ever, EVER lays a hand on you – even one time – if you are ever abused…. and if you are in the U.S., please call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-SAFE. You do not have to live like that; you deserve better!

Franklin’s Dragon and Allah’s Hellfire

Allah have given a horrible description of Hell, but neither Allah nor Muhammad could provide a single evidence of the existence of Hell and its fire. They contradicted each other on many points, which mean either Allah or Muhammad or both of them were damn liars.

---

[“As children tremble and fear everything in the blind darkness, so we in the light sometimes fear what is no more to be feared than the things children in the dark hold in terror”. ---- Lucretius, On the nature of things (ca. 60 BC)]

Famous psychologist Richard Franklin (cited Sagan, 1997, p. 171) while following a group therapy approach, narrated a very interesting fictitious conversation as below:

Suppose I seriously make an assertion to you, “A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage”.

“Show me”, you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle but no dragon. “Where is the dragon?” you ask. “Oh, that horrible creature is right here”. I reply, waving vaguely and horror in my eyes, “I forgot to mention that it’s an invisible dragon and its fire is also invisible”. You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon’s footprints.

“Good idea”, I say, “but this dragon floats in the air.”

“Then we can use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire”, you proposed.

“Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless”, I replied.

“Then why not spray-paint the dragon and make it visible”? you ask.

“Good idea, except this creature is a ghostly dragon and the paint would not stick”, I again replied back.

“Well, in that case, let me enter the garage and see if it bites me and if I feel the pain, I will know that something is there”, you decided.

“Good idea, but I forgot to tell you, its bite is also painless and even if it eats you, you will not realize that you are eaten and obviously you will look same as before”, another ready explanation comes from me.

Utterly confused!!!

The above conversation has no end, because it can be extended to any length. No matter how scientifically and logically you try to approach, always I have a ‘special’ explanation of why it would not work. But, by no means, I will come out of the idea that the dragon does exist. If you cannot detect, it is your fault, but at any cost the dragon exists.

This dragon story exactly reflects the Muslim’s idea of ‘Jahannam’, the Islamic Hell.

According to Islam, Hell is a real place, which Allah has created as a torture chamber for the disbelievers where they will burn forever in fire, because they are vilest of creatures (Q 98.1-8). Hellfire is a woeful punishment... (Q 33.8); … garments of fire, scalding water will be poured upon heads, melting skins and that which is in the bellies, will be tortured with hooked rods of iron, whenever they try to escape from Hell, they will be dragged, and will be told: 'Taste the torment of the conflagration' (Q: 22.19-22); …showered with water as hot as molten brass, which will scald their faces, evil shall be their drink, dismal their resting-place (Q: 18.29); punishment will never be lightened, and they shall be speechless with despair (Q: 43.74-75); … seized by their forelocks and their feet (Q: 55.41); … chains, fetters and a blazing (Fire) (Q: 76.4, Q: 73.12); choking food and a painful punishment (Q: 73.13); roast them in Hell (Q: 69.31); neither shade nor shelter from the flames (Q: 77.31); you and your idols shall be the fuel of Hell (Q: 21.98); food is Zakkum tree and foul pus (Q: 44.43, Q: 69.36).

What a sick and disgusting imagination, and a distortion of reality! The Muslims do not need to be better human being in terms of character or consciousness. All they have to do is to recite the Kalima (incantation): "there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his Prophet." In doing so, all Muslims—whether a terrorist, murderer, rapist, cheat, thug, pickpocket or a pimp—will go to Paradise, because they follow Islam. The ‘People of the book’, Idolaters and Atheists are destined to land in Hell for eternal suffering, no matter how pious and God-fearing they may have been. Their good thoughts, good actions or piety are of no value.

Psychologists say that the most effective way of securing dominance is by arousing someone's fear. Lovecraft’s (1973, p. 51) famously quoted line — "The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown" —is only the beginning of it. Lovecraft continues: “These facts few psychologists will dispute, and their admitted truth must establish for all time the generousness and dignity of the weirdly horrible tales as a literary form.”

The second one is favor. Whatever man does, he does out of fear or to gain favor. Hence these two factors severely influence judgment. Muhammad very skillfully exploited man's psychological mechanism, which consists of both of these two: fear and favor.

Franklin’s dragon and Allah’s Hellfire; in both cases the fear factor works and offsets the scale of commonsense of people. Though Allah had given horrible description of Hell, but neither Allah nor Muhammad could provide a single evidence of the existence of Hell and its fire. They contradicted each other on many points, which mean either Allah or Muhammad or both of them were damn liars. In spite of this, like the mental patient in the dragon story, Muslims are always one step ahead of their opponents to give a special explanation of why Hellfire is real. But the clarifications only raise further questions. If they apply a little logic and commonsense, they will be able to realize that Hellfire theory is pure absurd. It relies upon ignorance and thrives on it. The deeper one digs, the more obvious the deception becomes. If Muslims learn to apply a little logic, they will see much absurdities in the Hellfire theory same as the dragon story. But regretfully, skepticism and rational enquiry are practically nonexistent in Islam.

Let us expose various contradictions and absurdities bit by bit. First of all, according to Muhammad people are sent to Hell for not accepting Islam. This is unethical. Even if we force-believe this attitude of Allah, then also we are not sure which sect of Islam will escape Hellfire because every sect of Islam believes that they are following the real Islam. There are hundreds of sects and sub-sects in Islam. Different schools of thought offer different explanations as to what qualifies one as a believer. So who is destined to Hellfire?

Orthodox Sunni Muslims strongly believe that they will escape Hellfire. Teachers of Sunni law have argued that "Islam" means Sunni Islam only, and sects such as Shia, Ahmedi, Sufi etc, will also be sent to Hell. In trying to explain why all the other sects are displeasing to Allah, Sunnis offer the following verse from the Qur'an:

“Of those who split up their religion and became schismatics, each sect exulting in its tenets.” (Q 30.32)

Sunnis make up nearly 90% of all Muslims. Now, if we assume that only Sunnis can escape Hellfire, we are making a mistake, because it leads to another question. According to Bukhari:

• “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘From my followers there will be a crowd of 70,000 in number who will enter Paradise whose faces will glitter as the moon.’” (Bukhari: 8.76.550)
• “Verily! 70,000 of my followers will enter Paradise altogether; so that the first and the last amongst them will enter at the same time.” (Bukhari: 4.54.410).

Since there is no other place beyond Paradise and Hell, the billion plus Muslims will burn into Hellfire except those lucky 70,000 Muslims. Now the next question is; how to identify these 70,000 people? Tabari recorded,

“I asked the Messenger of Allah how many prophets there were. He replied, ‘124,000’.” (Tabari: I. 323).

Logically, all the Prophets of Allah had first preference to enter Paradise. It means there is no vacancy in Paradise. Not only this, already 54,000 Prophets had been turned away. So, all the present, past and future Muslims will go to Hell along with the infidels, despite their practicing of Islam. The long list of confusions starts from here.

Bukhari wrote:

“Every created soul has his place written for him either in Paradise or in the Hell Fire (Bukhari 6.60.473).

But according to Qur’an:

“And ye shall be sorted out into three classes” (Q 56.7)

So, where will the third group of people go? No one knows.

Hell and Hellfire were brought into existence by Muhammad’s hallucination and weird imagination. He was a malignant Narcissist. When he wanted to lure the Jews and Christians in Islam, he revealed the following verses, according to which the Jews and Christians can also escape Hellfire.

• “Those who believe (in the Qur'an), those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Sabians and the Christians, - any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, - on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.” (Q: 5.69)
• “Those who believe in the Qur’an...and the Christians...shall have their reward with their
• Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor they shall grieve” (Q: 2.62)

But the clever Jews and Christians paid little attention to Muhammad realizing that he was an imposter. It made Muhammad frustrated and Allah revealed the following verses, according to which no infidel can escape Hellfire.

• “And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the hereafter he will be one of the losers”. (Q: 3.85)
• “Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures” (Q: 98.6).
• “But those who reject Islam and are disbelievers, denying our Signs and Revelations, they shall be the owners of the Hell Fire.” (Q: 5.86)
• "O Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. Whoever joins other gods with Allah-Allah will forbid him the Paradise and the Fire will be his abode” (Q: 5.72).

The descriptions of Hellfire are so vivid that Muslims are mentally paralyzed at the very thought of it. Like the mental patient of the fictitious dragon story, they cannot see the deception of Muhammad. Whenever an analytical discussion is made about Islam, Muslims quickly proclaim scientific miracles in Qur’an, but what they talk is not science but pseudo-science. Let us analyze following two quotes.

• “Fever is from the heat of the Hell Fire; so cool it with water.’” (Bukhari 4.54.484)
• “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘If it is very hot, the severity of the heat is from the raging of the Hell Fire.’” (Bukhari 1.10.510)

If a person finds science in the above quotes, then he will find enough science in Voodoo also.

Following quotes are even more ridiculous. According to these, the ‘Paradise’ and ‘Hell’ are living creatures and they can argue with each other.

1. “The Prophet explained, ‘Paradise and Hell argued…. Allah said to the Hell Fire, ‘You are my (means of) punishment by which I torment whoever I wish of my slaves’.” (Bukhari 6.60.373)
2. “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘The Hell Fire complained to its Lord saying, “O my Lord! My different parts are eating each other up.” So, He allowed it to take two breaths, one in winter, the other in summer. This is the reason for the severe heat and bitter cold you find in weather.’” (Bukhari 4.54.482)

If Hellfire is a living creature, then how different parts of the same body can eat each other? Can a cannibal eat himself? Secondly, how Hellfire can be the reason of both ‘severe heat’ and ‘bitter cold’? Bukhari recorded:

“The Prophet said, ‘The Hell Fire is 69 times hotter than ordinary worldly fires’” (Bukhari 4.54.487).

The fire which is 69 times hotter than ordinary fire cannot produce bitter cold. Science does not go along with blind faith but pseudo-science does.

Is Hellfire already started or is it a futuristic event? Even Allah does not know. According to Bukhari, Hellfire is already started.

“The Prophet said: ‘I was shown the Hell Fire and the majority of its dwellers were women who are disbelievers or ungrateful.’ (Bukhari 1.22.28)

But according to Qur’an it is not yet started.

• “When the disastrous calamity comes; and Hell Fire shall be placed in full view for (all) to see, then for him who rebelled, Hell Fire will be his home.” (Q 79.34)
• When the event befalleth, there is no denying that it will befall, abasing (some), exalting (others) (Q 56.1-3)
• “And Hell is brought near that day; on that day man will remember, but how will the remembrance (then avail him)”? (Q 89.23)

If it is a futuristic event, how Muhammad saw the Hellfire? If it is already started, then above verses are false. Whom to believe: Allah or Muhammad?

Allah definitely needs tons of fuel to keep the Hellfire on. According to Qur’an; the stones, Pagan Gods and stubborn unbelievers make the fuel of Hell.

• “O you who have believed, protect yourselves and your families from a Fire whose fuel is people and stones...” (Q: 66.6)
• “…then fear the Fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.” (Q: 2.24)
• “Indeed, you (disbelievers) and what you worship other than God are the firewood of Hell. Had these (false deities) been (actual) gods, they would not have come to it, but all are eternal therein.” (Q: 21.98-99)

All the verses talking about the fuel of Hellfire are illogical. The bodies of the disbelievers will only offer a given and finite amount of fuel for fire. Eventually there will be nothing left to burn. This is same for all the deities.

Secondly; all leaving creatures will ultimately leave their bodies on the earth at the time of death. It is the "soul" that will either enter Hell or Paradise not the body. Since the soul is without body, it is obviously without cells, without neural receptors, and therefore without pain.

“I will drive him into Hellfire … it lets nothing remain and leaves nothing (unburned), altering the skins.” (Q: 74.26-29)

The above verse is ridiculous. It contradicts itself. It says the Hellfire leaves nothing unburned and at the same time it also says that the Hellfire alters the skin. If nothing is left there is no question of alteration of skin.

In the following verses Allah’s stupidity takes one step further. According to Qur’an, souls have replaceable skin and belly.

• “… every time their skins are roasted through We will replace them with other skins so they may taste the punishment.” (Q 4.56)
• “… poured upon their heads will be scalding water by which is melted that within their bellies and (their) skins.” (Q 22.19-20)

Muslim scholars have already noticed this inconsistency in Hellfire theory. They came out with a wonderful logic. According to them, Hellfire consists of smokeless fire that "burns, but does not consume" (Ahmad, 2006, p.351). But how a fire can burn without fuel? Secondly, if the fire does not consume one's flesh, there is no pain. Pain is caused by neural receptors in the brain alerting the living creature to cells being destroyed. If the fire does not consume one's flesh, no cells are destroyed, and thus there is no pain. Dead bodies do not feel pain because the brain is dead. This is what science says.

Eternal flames cannot be a true punishment to be feared. If the fire is never-ending, there is enough time to develop a higher tolerance of pain. It is a fact that human beings can reach a mental state where they do not feel pain. As example, the Buddhist monks in Vietnam can set themselves on fire without showing any reaction while burning to death (Batchelor, 1994, p. 354). They have nothing to fear from Hellfire.

Allah is so revengeful that He has arranged chains, yokes, and fetters in his Hell for the disbelievers, who will be tied up with chains and dragged with yokes on their necks,

• “… for the rejecters We have prepared iron chains, yokes, and a blazing Fire.” (Q 76.4)
• “With us are fetters (to bind them) …” (Q 73.12)
• “We will put yokes on the necks of the unbelievers.” (Q 34.33)
• “When yokes will be put round their necks and the chains, they will be dragged along.” (Q 40.71)
• “… make him march in a chain, whereof the length is seventy cubits.” (Q 69.32)
• But the above verses lead to another doubt. Allah says that the Hellfire “lets nothing remain and leaves nothing (unburned)… (Q 74.26-29)”. If nothing remains, then the chains, yokes, and fetters are of what use?

Next confusion is about the food of the Hell. According to Qur’an the disbelievers will eat from the obnoxious tree of Zakkum which will churn like boiling oil causing immense suffering. They have nothing else to drink except boiling hot water which will cause them further suffering.

• “No food will there be for them except from a bitter, thorny plant which neither nourishes nor avails against hunger.” (Q 88.6-7)
• “Indeed, the tree of zaqqum is food for the sinful, like murky oil, it boils within bellies, like the boiling of scalding water.” (Q 44.43-46)

But following verses contradict above verses. The disbelievers will eat festering puss that oozes out of their decaying skin and burnt flesh.

• “So no friend has he here this Day, nor has he any food except filth from the washing of wounds which none do eat but those in sin.” (Q 69.35-37)
• “This – so let them taste it – is scalding water and (foul) purulence. And other (punishments) of its type (in various) kinds.” (Q 38.57-58)
• “A boiling fluid and fluid dark, murky, intensely cold.” (Q 38.57)

Few doubts are immediately raised. The first one obviously is how Qur’anic verses are contradicting each other. Secondly, how a Zakkum tree can grow in Hell or boiling water can be available to drink, whose fire is 69 times hotter than normal fire? Tree cannot grow in fire and water will instantly vaporize in such an extreme hot atmosphere. Third; if the Hellfire leaves nothing unburned, then how festering puss can ooze out of decaying skin?

Utterly confused!!!

Franklin’s dragon and Allah’s Hellfire -- both are based on unshakable blind belief. What is the difference between a dragon that is invisible, floating, leaves no foot-print, emits heatless fire, cause painless bite and a dragon which does not exist? There is no way you can disprove my argument, but at the same time you cannot prove me false and shake my belief. My ‘sincere belief and fear’ is the only proof of the existence of the dragon.

Then actually what is going on in my mind?

First of all, I am asking you to take my sincerity as an authentic proof. Then I am asking you to ‘believe’ me unquestionably even if logic, commonsense and science are defied. This is the strength of the blind belief. The absence of evidence cannot be taken as the evidence of the absence of the dragon.

Muhammad described the Hell fire so vividly that it really does not matter to the Muslims whether these are true or false. They will give hundred explanations to make the Hellfire theory ‘meaningful’ to them. This is the strange mindset of Muslims. They invent their own ‘truth’ to renew their faith in Islam. They prefer to live under constant fear of Allah’s punishment and they are capable of spending their whole life in this delusion. As Butler (cited Sagan, 1997, p. 136) wrote,:

"A credulous mind… finds most delight in believing strange things, and the stranger they are the easier they pass with him; but never regards those that are plain and feasible, for every man can believe such”.

Islam is a spiritual tyranny. A real God shall never resort to sex, violence and torture to gain followers. It is an evil ploy of Muhammad. The tempting description of Paradise and painful description of Hell had only one reason behind it - to secure more converts to his faith. Little thoughts are required to understand that Muhammad was playing the role of God in fabricating the Qur’anic verses. Allah was Muhammad’s ‘instrument’ to fulfill his self-serving narcissistic desires. Following quote from the Hadith makes everything clear.

• “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Whoever obeys me will enter Paradise, and whoever disobeys me will not enter it’” (Bukhari 9.92.384)
• " ... If you love Allah, and follow me (Muhammad), God will love you, and forgive you your sins." (Q 3. 25)

Allah is obliged to throw a person in Hell even if he is sincerely devoted of Him but does not believe in Muhammad’s Prophetic claim. So we can see how helpless the God of Islam is. Such a weak God does not exist. Neither he has the power to throw the non-Muslims in Hell nor can he reward anyone with Paradise. Hellfire theory was a useful tool for Muhammad to use the fear factor for propagating his religion. There are 146 references to Hell in the Qur’an. Out of this, 94% of the reasons for being in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Muhammad, an unpardonable crime (Glazov & Warner, 2007). The common Muslim masses are just stupefied by this Hellfire theory. Their ethical and logical faculties are completely subdued.

This absurd theory is the main support of Islam for domination. It worked wonder for Muhammad by enriching and empowering him during his lifetime. Today it works wonder for the Imams, Mullahs and tyrants alike. Islam was created for one Malignant Narcissist’s quest for narcissistic attention. It is utter foolishness to search for spirituality in Islam. Islam is not just a false belief but also a mental disorder that reduces sane people into insane people. That’s why they cannot see the dishonesty of their Prophet.

References

1. Sagan, Carl (1997) The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. Ballantine Books. Random House Inc. USA.
2. Lovecraft, H. P (1973) Supernatural horror in literature. Dover Publications, Inc. NY.
3. Ahmad, Mahmood bin (2006) The magnificence of the Qur'an. Maktaba Dar-us-Salam. Riyadh.
4. Batchelor, Stephen (1994) The awakening of the west: the encounter of Buddhism and Western culture. Parallax Press. California
5. Glazov, Jamie, Warner (2007) The Study of Political Islam. An interview of Bill Warner published on February 05, 2007. FrontPageMagazine.com. (accessed Apr. 19 / 2010)

What Is Islam?

Whereas democracy is defined as the rule of the people, by the people, for the people, Islam is defined as the rule of Allah, by Allah and his emissaries, for the pleasure of Allah. And when people, out of concern for political correctness or ignorance, describe Islam as a religion of peace, they are, at the very least, guilty of misrepresenting it.

---

If only the masses of Muslims arise and carry out the orders of Allah, then we would have the promised paradise of Islam on earth as exemplified by such rules as that of the Taliban, Saudi Arabia, the Sudan, and of course the Shiite nirvana of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Islam is a comprehensive totalitarian form of slavery. It is the opposite of freedom. Its very name, Islam means submission or surrender. True to its name, Islam strives for nothing short of enslavement of the body of humanity as well as the bondage of its mind. This non-negotiable surrender to Islam requires the individual, as well as the society, to disenfranchise themselves of many of the fundamental and deeply cherished human rights.

Let’s have no doubt about it, Islam is political to the core. In Islam the mosque and State are one and the same—the mosque is the State and State is the Mosque. This arrangement goes back to the days of Muhammad himself. Islam is also radical in the extreme. Even the “moderate” Islam is radical in its beliefs as well as its deeds. Muslims believe that all non-Muslims, bar none, are hellfire bound and well-deserve being maltreated compared to believers.

Islam is a creed of an ignorant people of a primitive age. It is fixated in time and place; it harbors the ambition of taking the 21st century world back 14 centuries and ruling it by its dogma of intolerance, injustice and death. Yet, Islam is not only an obsolete vestige of a defunct era, but itself is an infinitely fractured belief that can hardly put its own home in order.

Islam is not a religion, but a harmful thorn; thus, we must make laws to fight this unwanted thorn growing like mushrooms in our backyards. If Islam is not controlled, these mushrooms soon will blossom and become mushroom-clouds.

There is truly no such thing as a “moderate” Muslim. Moderate Muslims, or in other words “non-practicing Muslims,” are moderate by default only. Like millions of Iranians who were born into a barbaric faith, they did not choose. A faith was “inflicted” upon them by invaders of a foreign culture, a faith that forbids them to leave or revert to their pre-Islamic heritage and other Iranian religions. The Iranians remain Muslims in name only, yet, they are not Muslim at all by any standards.

Presently, with each passing day Islam is making inroads in the traditionally Muslim lands as well as much of the non-Muslim world where Islam is beginning to run deep roots and vie with the laws and cultures of its hosts. Muslims are taking advantage of the freedom that democracies grant. They use the same provisions of the law that are intended to protect and enhance liberty to subvert democracy and freedom.

Currently, America is faced with a formidable enemy in a Trojan horse called Islam. This imminent danger makes it imperative to revisit the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and make the necessary changes to legally defeat Islam’s subversion of the democratic system.

Below is a presentation of what this surrender to Islam entails and why it is imperative that all freedom-loving people arise and defeat the menace of Islamofascisim.

Amendment I of the Bill of Rights enshrines some of the most cherished ideals of freedom-loving people:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Islam considers itself the three branches of government. It enacts laws as it sees fit, adjudicates laws, and executes as it deems. Islam is anathema to the provisions of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and much more.

Islam proclaims itself as the only legitimate religion for the entire world, grudgingly granting minor recognition to Judaism and Christianity from whom it has liberally plagiarized much of its dogma. Jews and Christians are allowed to live under the rule of Islam as “dhimmis” and must pay a special religious tax of jizya. Buddhists, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Baha’is, members of other religions, agnostics, or atheists are not even allowed to practice their belief or disbelief.

Islam actively suppresses and even prohibits the practice of other religions, including those of the “people of the book,” Jews and Christians. There is not a single church or synagogue in the cradle of Islam, Saudi Arabia, while thousands of mosques dot the tolerating and welcoming non-Muslim lands. Islamic countries that allow for Jewish and Christian places of worship subject these “people of the book” to numerous subtle and not-so-subtle forms of persecution. Muslims in non-Muslim lands proselytize relentlessly and convert others while any Muslim who leaves Islam is judged as apostate and automatically condemned to death.

Freedom of speech is just about non-existent in Islam. The word is Allah’s, his chosen divines such as Ayatollahs and Imams are the only ones who are to make pronouncements squarely based on Allah’s word, the Quran. Any expression that deviates in the least from the Quran, the Hadith or the edicts of Islamic high divines is heresy and severely punishable. Hence, stifling of free expression is the major mechanism by which the Islamic clergy retain power and prevent constructive change in Islamic societies.

Freedom of the press is completely alien to Islam, since a free press tends to express matters as it sees it, rather than as it is stated in the Quran. To Islam, the Quran is the press and the only press. There is no need for critical reporting, no need to present ideas that may conflict with the Quran, and no place for criticism of anything Islamic. The stranglehold of Islam on the individual and society is complete.

Peaceful assembly of the people is not allowed. The backward oppressive Islamic societies inflict great hardship on the citizenry and any assembly of the victims presents a threat to the suffocating rule. Islamic governments routinely prevent peaceful assemblies from taking place. Failing to do so, they unleash their hired thugs, the police and even the military against any assemblage no matter how peaceful and how legitimate is its grievance. The Islamic Republic of Iran which is vying with Saudi Arabia as the leader of true Islamic rule, routinely attacks any and all gatherings of its people, arrests them, imprisons them without due process, tortures them, and even executes them in secret dungeons. Journalists, academics, unionists, students, teachers, women rights groups who dare to petition the government for redress are labeled subversive and are severely punished.

Maltreatment of religious minorities and the non-religious is criminal indeed. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, the government has launched a systematic program of genocide against its largest religious minority—the Baha’is. The government is gathering a comprehensive list of Baha’is, their occupations, locations, properties and the like—action reminiscent of the Nazis. The government is banning Baha’i students from post high-school education unless they recant their religion, deprives them of engaging in numerous forms of occupations and trades, denies them from holding worship gatherings, and razes their holy places and much more. The Islamic Republic of Iran is not satisfied with its cruel treatment of the living Baha’is and has launched a war on their dead by bulldozing Baha’i cemeteries in several cities. Thus is the rule of fundamental Islamism that is awaiting the complacent and snoozing world.

Oppression of women in general is tragic indeed. Men are allowed to have as many as four wives simultaneously and as many concubines as they wish or can afford. Men can easily divorce their wives and automatically have the custody of the children, if they so decide. Women have subservient status to men in all areas of the law. Equality under the law has no meaning in Islam. Just one example of the dreadful way of treating women in Islam is a case of a Saudi woman who was gang-raped. The Islamic court sentenced the woman to a prison term and lashes for having committed the “sin” of riding in a car with a male who was not her relative. This is a standard form of Islamic Sharia justice—a savage heritage of barbarism that ruled the Arabian Peninsula a few centuries ago.

Islam has a solution for every “problem.” It deals with homosexuals, for instance, by hanging them en mass and gloating about it, even though homosexuality is just as prevalent in Islamic lands as anywhere else. Recently an Ayatollah made a ruling on homosexuals. He said that they should be tortured before they are hanged. In Islam, the rulings of high-ranking clergy constitute the law and are binding.

Not only does Islam not allow freedom of assembly and the press, it is intrusively restrictive in every aspect of a person’s life. The way women should dress, the haircut of men, the music people are allowed, movies to watch, television programs to view, and even parties in the privacy of their home are subject to the ridiculous monitoring of moral police. Islam is hell-bent on outward morality and puritanical conduct while it is rotten to the core just below the pretentious surface.

Islam segregates by gender many public places and events such as beaches, sporting venues, public transportation, and even building elevators. Families are often prevented from attending a sporting event together or swimming together at a beach.

Egypt, the crown of the Arab-Islam world, demands that citizens declare Islam or only one of the two other religions, Judaism and Christianity, as their religion in order to receive the government-issued identity cards. ID cards are required for jobs, healthcare, education, a marriage license and a host of other things. If you are an agnostic, an atheist, a Buddhist, a Hindu, a Baha’i, you are forced to perjure yourself to receive the indispensable ID card. In a real sense, Islam, the pretender of high moral ground, compels people to lie in order to receive what is their birthright as citizens.

The fact that Islam is a splintered house complicates matters greatly. The faith is divided into Sunni and Shiites sects with numerous sub-sects. The divisions and contentiousness are so profound that members of one sect consider the other Muslims as apostates worthy of death. The division goes back to the time of the Prophet himself. Shiites believe that the enemies of true faith subverted its chain of authority at Muhammad’s death. They claim that the Prophet, while on his deathbed, asked for a parchment to dictate his will and to appoint Ali, his cousin and son-in-law, as his successor. The Shiites claim that Umar, an influential disciple and commander of the faith, declined the request saying to the Prophet: hasbena ketab-ul-llah—sufficient unto us is the book of God. Before long, division and infighting started in earnest and continues to this day.

Oppression of Shiite minorities in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are only two glaring instances of this longstanding and irreconcilable intra-faith hostility. The Shiite majorities in other lands return the favor to the Sunni minorities, as is the case in Iran. The recent horrific sectarian killings in Iraq represent glaring instances of irreconcilable differences among the various claimants to the mantle of true Islam.

Islam is definitely misrepresented. Islam is not misrepresented by its “detractors,” it is misrepresented by Islamic mercenaries; organizations and individuals generously funded by states as well as wealthy believers who are making billions of dollars pumping and selling oil at astronomical prices. Prestigious universities in the West, always looking for handouts, are tripping over one another to establish Islamic studies programs staffed by professors who sing the praises of Islam.

Ironically, Islamic associations routinely intimidate many newspapers, if they dare to print the truth about Islam. Legions of lawyers, both Muslims as well as hired guns, are on the lookout to intimidate and silence any voice speaking the truth about Islam. The media organizations that fall in line may receive generous advertising and other incentives from Islamic lobbyists.

I have asserted many times in the past that I am not against Muslims. I condemn Islam and those who support and promote it. In the same sense that I am not against slaves, I am against slavery and those who advocate and advance it. The very practice of Islam is tantamount to perpetuating and practicing slavery. Slavery enslaves the body, while Islam entraps the mind. Both ideals and practices are abhorrent and detrimental to the realization of our highest hopes as human beings.

In conclusion: Islam is not a religion by any standard. It is a militant, political and savage cult created by one man: Muhammad. It is time that we treat Islam as the greatest threat to human race. I have been sounding the alarm about Islam’s imminent deadly threat for a number of years. The Islamic treasury, flush with oil extortion money together with the help of useful idiots, is having the upper hand in this battle of survival for freedom. The slaveholder Islam has been transformed into a more virulent form of Islamofascism; it is an inveterate unrelenting enemy of freedom. Free people must act now and stem the tide of this deadly threat. Tomorrow may be too late. Freedom is too precious to abandon through complacency, acts of political correctness, or outright cowardice.

---

Imani is the author of the smashing book “Obama Meets Ahmadinejad”. Get your copy today.