What Muslims Recite and Chant in Five-Time Daily Prayers

While Kafirs get impressed by Muslims' discipline and devotion in five-time daily prayers, little do they know what they truly say in their recital and chanting of illegible Quranic verses: sex-talk, badmouthing of infidels and women, cursing and threats of violence, and meaningless childish statements about heavenly bodies and old prophets...

---

Many non-Muslims get impressed by the discipline and devotion of Muslims, when they see them praying salats five times or more daily, chanting and reciting Quranic verses, which they don't understand. They think they are such a spiritual and holy people. Little do they know that their chants and recitals are far from spiritual, instead actually sex-talk, badmouthing of infidels and women, cursing and threats of violence, and meaningless childish statements about heavenly bodies and old prophets... Here is a sampling of Quranic ayas that Muslims chant in their salat and religious ceremonies, including blessings they are invited to give in infidel inaugurations…

• Muhammad was allowed to bang his wives, captured women, slave girls, first cousins, and any woman who offered herself to him (Quran 33.50)

• Muslim men can bang their four wives, captured women and slave girls (4.3, 4.24, 23.6, 33.50, 70.30)

(No first cousins and one night stand with volunteers for normal Muslims; that privilege was reserved for Prophet Mohammad only.)

• Muhammad banged his daughter in law by Allah’s order (33.37)
• Muhammad banged his wife’s maid by Allah’s order (66.1-5)
• Wives are tilth, who can be married before age of menstruation, approached at will in any style, beaten divorced and replaced, raped and contracted for short periods (2.223, 65.4, 4.24, 4.34)
• Women can be captured, enslaved and raped by waging Jihad war (4.3, 4.24, 23.6, 33.50, 70.30)
• Rape of a woman requires four male witnesses to prove, other wise she gets punished for adultery (Q 24.4)
• Non-Muslims are evil, liars, perverts, filthy, they are lowest creatures and worst beasts (Q 5.59, 8.22, 8.55, 9.5, 9.28, 16.39, 95.5, and many more)
• The infidels, homosexuals and apostates must be killed (9.5, 4.15, 4.16, 4.89, and 160+)
• Allah converted Jews into monkeys for fishing while fasting (7.163-166)
• Thamud tribe wiped out by Allah for slaughtering his (7.73,77; 54.23, 54.27,29,30,31; 91.11,13,14)
• She camel, which came out of a stone instead of a vagina (Q 7:73, Tabari II:41, Ibn Kathir Tafsir of 7:73)
• Allah killed man and his donkey and reborn them after 100 years to prove his power (Q 2.259)
• Allah made boys and his dog sleep for 309 years for kicks (Q 18.10-19)
• Prophet Sulaiman spoke the language of all living beings including ants (Q 27.15-44; 34.12-13)
• Jesus talked right after birth, gave sight to blind and life to dead (5.110)

(Why then Muslims have a cow when Christians claim him to be a God)

• Sun has a resting place in murky waters (36.38, 71.016)

(This great scientific discovery was made by Zulkarnain aka Alexander, the great Muslim general, after he went to the end of the world)

• The moon is a lamp (71.016)

Moon is a lamp emitting light every night

• Stars are lights attached to the lowest sky and can be used as missiles to shoot down evil jinns (67.5, 37.6)

(Stars have dual purpose. They are lights attached to the lowest sky for decoration. But when the Satan tries to spy on Allah, Allah uses them as missiles to shoot the vermin down).

• Sky is the roof/canopy without cracks where water is stored (2.22; 13.2; 50.6,7; 22.65)

(Allah made a roof for the earth on top which he stores water. He also ensured that the solid roof has no cracks. Since there are no pillars built on earth to hold the roof, Allah uses his miraculous powers to hold it in suspension and prevents it falling on earth.)

• Mountains are pegs to hold the earth firm in its place (Q 78.6-7)

Allah stretched out earth flat like carpet and built mountains as pegs to hold the carpet flat and in place, lest it will move, fold or ripple

• After creating earth sky and mountains Allah offered Islam to them (33.72)

Allah created earth, mountains and sky as its solid roof and humans on earth. Then he offered Islam to all of them. Earth mountains and sky refused to become Muslims, perhaps they felt that they will not be able to meet Islam’s obligation of salat fasting and Haj... Only humans accepted Islam but even they couldn’t be good Muslims

After mountains refused to accept Islam, Allah forced them to recite hymns (azan) twice daily (Q 38.18)

Islam is the Problem

Islam is the problem for us infidels, and the only way to assure safety of ourself and our future generations is to physically separate ourself from Muslims, although a good few, who go by the Muslim label, have to suffer...

---

[Believers are a “trapped mind” to be liberated, trapped souls with no guidance, ignorant humans with no knowledge; while their “closed minds” are sinking in the ocean of the dark ages, or simply that they were born believers and don’t know any better…]

We often hear, read or get to know from various mouths that ‘only a tiny minority of Muslims support terrorism’! However, in reality, a huge majority of Muslims hate the West! Still citing these Islamic apologists, we can give three reasons as to why Muslims hate the West—they all being our faults!

As a whole, the larger concerns are the Muslims who reject terrorism of the 9/11 type but nevertheless hate the West. This hatred, however, is not mainly derived from the American support for Israel or America's alleged imperialist history, nor is it because, as President Bush once put it, "they hate us for our freedom". Instead, the Muslim anti-Americanism is traced to their strong belief that the West in general and America in particular are conducting a "war on Islam". And when Muslims are asked why they think this is so, they point to three things…

1) Firstly, America's support for secular Muslim despots!

2) Secondly, America’s dissemination of anti-religious and immoral values all over the world through the American popular culture!

3) Thirdly, they point to inflammatory statements of (some) Americans, who say: "The problem is not 'radical' Islam but Islam itself, from which it follows, that we must seek to weaken and contain Islam".

As one wishes,

a) Should we make serious efforts to reduce Muslim migration to the West?

Or,

b) Should the West launch crazy secularizing crusades to transform the religious beliefs of Muslims, a group numbering well over a billion people?

We must first understand that, all Muslims may not look or act alike, but that they all mostly think alike!

There are the Islamic peoples who are our sworn enemies; but there are others, who act as moderates, they being alienated rightfully from the West(?), because they want to rule but can’t, they want to affirm traditional Islamic values in their adopted countries but can’t, and also because they are disgusted with the anti-Muslim sentiments exhibited by the Kafirs.

When the so-called moderation of Muslims is of little help, a “secularizing crusades to transform the religious beliefs of Muslims" would be meaningless. Instead, of excluding the Muslims from the West and confining them within their historic Muslim lands may be of more effective measures... As it is said, oh!, a hundred times, that ‘any change in the Muslim beliefs is beyond our power (though it would be nice), and what is indispensable for our own safety and freedom is that, we have take away the Muslims' external ability to wage jihad on us, by isolating and containing Islam’. Yet the attributes of the agenda to beget the religious beliefs of Muslims, is something we all are repeatedly trying to do, is not beyond our power to do so???

Whereby, many are wholly unaware of the single-most important feature of Islam; it is in its’ antagonistic relationship with non-Muslims: the Koran and the other authoritative Islamic texts that declare all non-Muslims are enemies of Allah, and command Muslims to wage aggressive Islamic war (Jihad) against all non-Muslims until they are totally subdued! To suggest that the Muslims would cease as posing a mortal danger to Western principals, if people stopped saying that Islam poses a mortal danger to the West, it is to encourage our complete surrender to Islam...!

Think of a Muslim, who can't even get the most basic facts right, and who gets the understanding of Islam from their holy book, the Quran itself, and also from Islamic Mullahs. What a mighty force you are! Islam is personally the main reason hundreds of millions of Muslims hate America and the West for! I can just imagine them all up on the roof, firing their guns in the air and shouting "Allah o Akbar, Death to America, Death to Austere". It is essential to understand that what makes both "radical" and "moderate" Muslims dangerous to non-Muslim societies. It is not that Muslims are inherently bad people, but because they are Muslims! They would remain dangerous as long as they remain believing Muslims, believe that the things Islamic Allah commands them to do are sacred to them, written in stone, and that they have ‘no obligations’ to ever ask, think, or reject any verses of Allah.

In waging jihad and instituting Islamic Shariah in all lands of Allah, they are not being bad people as one may presume; they are just being Good Muslims! Thus, the question of moral goodness or badness, kindness or meanness, of individual Muslims is totally irrelevant from the point of view to the threat that Islam poses to non-Muslim societies. The issue is not the moral characteristics of an individual Muslim person, but that the unchanging and unchangeable character of Islam itself. Contrary to what it is known to all Muslims, as far as we are aware, mentioned or said many a times about Islam, that it is our opinions/principals are what inflames the Muslim sentiments against the West. Indeed, these views are far fetched from mainstream Muslims, who have probably never ever questioned the Quran or, for that matter, have never ever discreetly deciphered the foolish human lethargies in it. But even if they had done so, it is still unquestionable! And, suppose that these situations were changed? Suppose the spokesmen of the West began by saying clearly and consistently to Muslims: "We know what your religion is about; we know it commands the complete subjugation of humanity to the Islamic Shariah Laws, and you can't fool us with your concealments and your claims of moderateness, so don't even try. We know that you represent a mortal danger to our entire society, our freedoms, our cultural heritage, our ways of life, and everything we are". If that had to happen, Muslims would become ghastly enraged. Instead, they would not be impressed by these Western leaders who spoke the real truth about Islam to them with seriousness and force. Muslims would never respect those who have enough respect for Islam to speak the truth, instead of telling pretty lies. Do you think Muslims respect Obama and other Western leaders, who keep saying/reminding them how wonderful and tolerant Islam is? Of course, ‘not’! They despise them, even as they eagerly take advantage of their generosities of shelter, food, clothing, good education and money. The Muslims are living parasites, feeding on us, and draining us death!

But wouldn't such a statement enrage Muslims? It would in the present situation. As things are now, the pessimistic liberal West is constantly telling Muslims that ‘they tolerate everyone, they welcome diversity, and they see Islam as a great religion’. Muslims take these statements as a grant of entitlement to them to move into Western societies and start gaining power by population growth. They often take multiple wives and have children as litters... They are licensed by Islam to ‘go fourth and rightfully produce’, whilst living on social benefits and never intend to work or even earn living by honest labor! So, when an isolated Islam critic suddenly says that Islam is the problem, it enrages the entitled Muslims, who are accustomed to total Western accommodationism and cowardice. If we are strong to Islam, the Muslims will see us as a worthy foe! But, so long as we coddle and embrace Islam, the odd truth speaker here and there, like Pope Benedict in his disastrous Regensburg address of some years ago, would certainly enraged them, just because the Pope was violating the assumed dhimmi arrangement and thus insulting their honor of religion.

Therefore, in excluding Muslims from Western lands, we are not discriminating or passing judgment against them as human beings; we are only protecting ourselves from the religion to which Muslims are inextricably linked. "What is to be done about Islam"?

Moreover, to state the truth—which no Muslim can ever deny—that Islam commands our total subjugation to Islam! And since we have no intentions of being subjugated to Islam, there has to be a way to stop this nonsense? We do need the culpability to change the radical mind of Islam!

Is it possible to do so?

Can we reform it, or even destroy it?

We tried to democratize it, but we have failed, as Islam can never be reformed! This bended ideology is what the prophet of Islam had formulated in his alleged divine verses, and later on, when they were complied into a book, the Quran, the compliers made it sure that the Quran remained two faced holy! These changes are not possible. To me, the only possible way we can assure safety for us and our future generations from the menace of Islam is to physically separate it from ourselves, so that Islam can cause no harm to us!

When we say that Islam is the problem, we do mean that Islam is a problem for us! Well, it is as much a problem for Muslims; just look at the Muslim countries and communities around the world and see it all yourself.

Islamic Circle of North America Tirelessly Oppose Extremism & Violent Ideology by Teaching Violent Jihad against Infidels

When five associates of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) were arrested in Pakistan for joining Jihad, ICNA was quick to distance itself, saying "Extremism has no place in Islam, and ICNA works tirelessly to oppose extremist and violent ideology." But ICNA's reading list include materials of al-Banna, al-Qaradawi and Maududi, who propagate violent Jihad against infidels for establishing global Islamic rule...

---

When five young Americans disappeared from the greater D.C. area last November, only to be arrested a week later in Pakistan where they allegedly sought to join the jihad against Americans, people wondered why.

Why would five young men forfeit lives of comfort and opportunity to try to kill soldiers defending the nation that made all that possible? How could reportedly supportive families generate radical Islamists like Ramy Zamzam? Emerging from court in January, he declared, "We are not terrorists. We are jihadists, and jihad is not terrorism."

Much of the initial focus was drawn to the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), the organization to which all five young men belonged. This dissipated following assurances from ICNA and its local chapter that it had not engaged in any form of radicalization and, in fact, would launch programs to combat it:

"Extremism has no place in Islam, and ICNA works tirelessly to oppose extremist and violent ideology."

The local youth director Mustafa Abu Maryam, who had worked with Zamzam in leading fundraising for the new mosque in Virginia, pointedly declared:

"Our group discussion never talked about politics, never talked about ongoing conflicts, never talked about fighting against anyone, indirectly or directly. On the contrary, we always promoted being compassionate toward others and good stewards of humanity."

However, the recommended reading list for ICNA's youth organization for boys, called "Young Muslims," shows the opposite. The book list includes numerous works by authors such as the Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasan Al-Banna, current spiritual leader Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, and Jamaat-e-Islami founder Abul 'Ala Maududi. These works are not countered by books or essays which offer a more passive, peaceful message.

The Muslim Brotherhood is the world's largest Islamist group, and its motto is, "Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope."

Jamaat-e-Islami is the Indian subcontinent's equivalent of the Muslim Brotherhood. Maududi advocated worldwide overthrow of all non-Muslim regimes, such as this example from his book, Jihad Fi Sabillilah [Jihad in the way of Allah], which is not part of the Young Muslims reading list, shows:

"It must now be obvious that the objective of the Islamic jihad is to eliminate the rule of an un-Islamic system, and establish in its place an Islamic system of state rule. Islam does not intend to confine his rule to a single state or a hand full of countries. The aim of Islam is to bring about a universal revolution. Although in the initial stages, it is incumbent upon members of the party of Islam to carry out a revolution in the state system of the countries to which they belong; their ultimate objective is none other than world revolution."

More recently, the Jamaat has expressed support for violent jihad against American forces and other non-Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and elsewhere. The organization also salutes the jihad of groups like Hamas, Hizballah, and Hizbul Mujahideen in Kashmir.

Similarly, Qaradawi's Priorities of the Islamic Movement in the Coming Phase, contained in its entirety on the Young Muslims website, includes a call for supporting violent Jihad movements around the world:

"This is why the faqihs of Islam have agreed that it is a duty to defend every land invaded by infidels, stating that such jihad is imperative for Muslims in this land as an individual obligation and that all Muslims must support them with money, arms and men as required until all their land has been liberated from any aggressor who usurps it."

Qaradawi goes on to encourage participating in jihad movements in Kashmir, Somalia, the Philippines, Sudan, and declares that, "The Islamic Movement should consider itself at the beck and call of every Islamic cause, responding to every cry for help wherever that cry may come from."

Other books appearing on the website, like Maududi's Towards Understanding Islam, reinforce the need for violence. In this book, Maududi considers jihad a part of worship:

"Jihad is a part of this overall defense of Islam. Jihad means struggle to the utmost of one's capacity. A man who exerts himself physically or mentally or spends his wealth in the way of Allah is indeed engaged in Jihad. But in the language of the Shari'ah [Islamic law] this word is used particularly for the war that is waged solely in the name of Allah and against those who perpetrate oppression as enemies of Islam. This supreme sacrifice of lives devolves on all Muslims... In all these cases Jihad is as much a primary duty of the Muslims concerned, as are the daily prayers or fasting. One who shirks it is a sinner. He is plainly a hypocrite who fails in the test of sincerity and all his 'Ibadat and prayers are a sham a worthless hollow show of devotion."

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, founder of the anti-Islamist American Islamic Forum for Democracy, said books such as these form "a theo-political ideology that is the gateway drug toward violent Islamism for susceptible Muslims."

Groups like ICNA do not promote Islam, but rather Islamism, the linking of politics and religion, Jasser said. "Islamism and its efforts at youth indoctrination is a separatist movement which overwhelms youth in the guise of religion - Islam."

ICNA, by promoting this literature, encourages this philosophy. It is not the first time.

In 1997, ICNA's The Message [International] honored Jibril Abu Adam, a young man killed fighting in a Jihad in circumstances that greatly resembled the attempts of the 5 men currently held in Pakistan. The article, entitled "Actions Speak Louder than Words," celebrated the radicalization and eventual death of the young American convert who fought in Kashmir. Aside from noting that "it is quite evident that Jibril's struggles were motivated by devotion to Allah," the article began by stating:

"The Qur'an urges Muslims to seek knowledge and then to act on the knowledge they acquire. It also says that the person who merely obtains knowledge without taking actions is like a donkey carrying books, i.e., such knowledge becomes a burden that benefits no one. For one young man, knowledge became a source of inspiration that led him to take actions that can benefit everyone."

When Jibril was "questioned about the perils of Jihad," he asserted that “a shaheed (martyr) is the best, and I want to be the best," the article said.

On November 29th, 1997, at ICNA's Southeastern Regional Convention in Atlanta, a plaque was presented to Jibril's family in celebration of his martyrdom. The plaque read:

"Think not of those who are killed in Allah's Cause as dead. Nay they are alive with their Lord and have their provision (Qur'an 3:169). In recognition of Jibril Abu-Adam (also known as Lawrence Nicolas Thomas) for his devotion to His Creator and his ultimate sacrifice on behalf of his fellow Muslims in Kashmir."

Similar incitement can be found in dozens of ICNA publications, conferences, and rallies. An October 1993 issue of The Message was called, "The Engines of Hate," and expressed virulent anti-Semitism for the supposed Jewish role in manufacturing bias against Muslims. Among other examples of hate speech, it noted the "Jewish domination in the two Houses of [the] US Congress" because of their "money and power." It also issued an ominous warning to Jews that their "manipulating power in the US" was "far greater than in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s," and that they "may be digging their own graves." Another article from August 1999, "ICNA: A Successful Journey And A Promising Road Ahead," written by then- ICNA president Zaheer Uddin, declared:

"Islam is a movement. There is no status quo and passive attitude in Islamic movement. If we want to keep our identity as Muslims; if we want to train our next generation as practicing Muslims; if we want to propagate and establish Islam in this society, we have to be dynamic and smart Daees [missionaries]... Future is very bright for Islam in America. Let us say [the] future of America is Islam, Insha Allah... Come and become part and parcel of Islamic movement - Islamic Circle of North America, and join hands to achieve the goal of establishing Islam in this world and having the pleasure of Allah in the life hereafter."

At a rally prior to the July 2001 conference, then-President of ICNA Zulfiqar Ali Shah led chants of, "our path is jihad," and stated:

"Whether they are brothers in Palestine or Kashmir, they belong to the Muslim ummah and we are united with them in their struggle. We stand for them and we are for their support and for the victory in Muslim [sic]. Let's give a big takbir for our mujahideen brothers and sisters in Kashmir."

The conflict between ICNA's message to youth and its declarations of innocence is palatable, Jasser said:

"This organization [ICNA] is teaching Islamism as a dominant political movement ...Basically this theo-political ideology is the gateway drug toward violent Islamism for susceptible Muslims. Those who are not susceptible Muslims are still part of a separatist movement which is not commensurate with our Constitution and Bill of Rights."

While it is unclear how the five young Americans arrested in Pakistan were radicalized, it is clear that ICNA's recommended reading for young Muslims instills little confidence in its commitment to fighting radical ideology.

---

This article appeared in Investigative Project Website, entitled ICNA's Radical Reading List.