Future Terrorism is expected to witness the expansion of various types of Terror networks and forces existing today, including, on the one hand, the social class warfare (Marxist) such as Maoism in Asia or neo-Trotskyism in Latin America. On the other hand, the many separatist terror networks such the PKK in Turkey, Chechen in Russia, southern Philippines, Xingian Ughiur or in Kashmir in India are expected to continue with their attempts, short of political solutions, with regard to these issues. But beyond these forms of Terror, the widest network projected to expand and threaten most democracies around the world is undoubtedly the Jihadi Global web indoctrinated by the Salafi ideology.
Other forms of Jihadi terror groups, some supported by the Khomeini ideology, are also expected to expand in the Middle East and beyond, depending on the political future of the regimes that support them, mainly in Iran. Hence, what democracies in the West and Asia will continue to face off with, in the next two decades, are organizations and movements identifying themselves as Jihadist (al Jihadiyyun). Al Qaeda will continue to mutate and morph as well as the organizations that espouse the same ideology. We may even see new types of Jihadi groups emerging.
Based on a totalitarian ideology and a universal agenda, the global Jihadist threat targets democracies throughout the international community in an effort to establish what they coin as “Emirates,” from the kind we witnessed under the Taliban before 2001 and the attempts we see in Iraq’s Sunni triangle, Somalia and in Waziristan. These pockets are building blocks for the sought Caliphate, the ultimate goal of all Jihadi movements and organizations since the 1920s.The Jihadist movements have been diverse and have adopted different international strategies as I have explained in my book Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies against the West.
Internationalization of the Jihadists
One major feature of these Jihadist Salafi movements is that they draw their principles from one universal ideology. Hence, they are able to assist each other against dispersed, and often divided, foes. The Jihadi terror forces were able to single out the United States, European democracies, Russia, India, Black Africa, China and many moderate Muslim countries. It is clear that the Jihadists are coordinating worldwide and their targets are not. Worse, the Jihadist propaganda often hijacked separatist causes and transformed them into a Jihadi battlefield making it difficult on the rest of the world to identify them as Terrorists, but as resistance movement. These are the cases in Chechnya, Kashmir, Southern Philippines, Gaza and Lebanon. The propaganda network of all Jihadi forces combined would isolate the United States and fight it on particular issues, rather than isolate an Arab or Muslim government on another issue, as in Pakistan, Nigeria or Egypt. Then the Jihadi machine would demonize India on the Kashmir issue and try to isolate New Delhi on the matter.
Internationalization of the Confrontation against the Jihadi Terror
Today’s central question is about the internationalization of the confrontation with the Jihadi forces operating in many countries. Salafists and their radicalization network worldwide aim at confronting their own foes, mostly democracies, one at a time and with various strategies. In our assessment, we are proposing a global response integrating the resources of all targeted countries by al Qaeda. Hence, future strategies must be based on the following principles:
a. That targeted democracies around the world, including India and Russia, would develop a joint platform on all levels to counter that ideology and isolate the threat instead of being isolated by it as I argued in my book The Confrontation: Winning the War against Future Jihad.
b. That regional coordination must also develop such as in Africa, in the Muslim world and in Latin America, to coordinate efforts based on the particularity of each region.
c. That the sum of all these platforms comes under an international platform of confrontation with the Jihadist forces.
(Adapted from Professor Phares’ speech to the Asian Security Conference 2010 under the theme “Asian Strategic Futures 2030: Trends, Scenarios and Alternatives.” Professor Phares’ presentation was under the title: “The Future of Terrorism: Jihadi threat in the Indian Subcontinent”)
