Conspiracy behind the Daily 5 Times Prayers & the Mid-Night Prayers

Muhammad designed Islamic prayers and their timings not for spiritual purposes but for ensuring his personal protection and security from likely attacks by his victims.

---

Muhammad: A Bad Atheist

Muhammad was Atheist! Don’t get shocked! Muhammad was not only an Atheist, but also a bad one. Generally, atheists are good people, who fundamentally believe in equality and liberty for all human beings. They are certainly better than all brands of divisive Theists. But we are also humans, born with the capability of doing good as well as bad, irrespective of whether we are Theists or Atheists. And Muhammad was one of the worst cases among Atheists.

Muhammad case was unique. His ultimate goal was to rule the Arab Peninsula, behind a religious mask, which he did achieve successfully.

He protested against the centuries-old belief of his forefathers. He abused and broke the idols of the Gods, he used to worship in his pre-Islamic Pagan days. Just to condemn and subsequently annihilate the Jews of Medina, he perverted the Jewish doctrine of monotheism by fabricating the story about Azra or Uzair as the son of God (absent in Jewish scripture). He denied the crucifixion of Jesus, the central pillar of Christianity. He condemned the sacred scriptures of the Jews and Christians as fabrications and perversions by them.

Atheists believe in truth, not in in-vogue myths and blind beliefs, and they call for critical inquiry to unravel the mystery of the world as a way of enlightening and freeing ignorant masses from superstitious believes. Whereas Muhammad, instead of enlightening the ignorant masses, created his own cult with a religious mask mixing old myths, superstitions and beliefs. He needed a God to proceed with. Uncreative as he was, he stole the name of one of the old Gods of his forefather, i.e. of Allah, so as to persuade the Pagans towards his cult, when he was in Mecca. After he failed badly in Mecca, he migrated to Medina and started praying towards the Jewish Temple of Jerusalem, so as to persuade Medina's thriving Jewish community to join his cult. But again he failed.

Having failed in Mecca, he had already started terrorizing and plundering the Meccan trade-caravans, which was critical to their livelihood. After his second failure in Medina, Muhammad now decided to terrorize and exterminate the Jews of Medina and capture their wealth.

During this period, he had stolen the names and fetishes from other religions. He created 99 different names of his God in confusion. Among them, Ar-Rahman was the name of a Yemeni idol-God. He copied the vast portions of his ideas from previous scriptures and embedded it in his Quran. He plagiarized the doctrine of paradise (Jannat Al-Firdous) from the Persians.

So, he certainly wasn’t afraid of any God. He cheated his own God, Allah, to fulfill his ambitions and lust, by fabricating verses and stories in His name.

From the above-mentioned facts, one can easily come to a conclusion about Muhammad’s uniqueness. There wasn’t any bit of spirituality in his cult. Every action of his was designed to his own benefit, to attain his goal and satisfy his lusts and desires. Let us put some of his actions on trial for scrutiny.

Devoties or security gaurds?

First, let us ponder over the fact of 5-time daily prayers and the mid-night prayer (Tahajut), and how it helped Muhammad in his career.

Those, who read the hadiths, know that Muhammad had married 15 wives or more, and at the time of his death, he was living with 9 of them in a house, adjacent to his mosque, with a curtain separating his house and the mosque. Muhammad was a coward and always wanted somebody to die for his cause. He and his house were protected by security guards round the clock on a shift basis (Sahih Al-Bukhari 7:734), while he engaged in merry and sexual orgy inside the house, often copulating with all 9 wives on the same night [Bukhari (62:6): "The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives."]

Allah, the most merciful and passionate, it is claimed, loves his creation 70 times more than a mother loves her children. Yet, the merciful Allah ordered His children to line up and salute him 5 times a day at “Muhammad’s mosque” only. When some of his male followers started praying to Allah at a separate houses (mosque) of their own, Muhammad ordered to burn the house, and it was burned down when those men were praying inside (Bukhari Vol 1:617 & 1:626). Praying to Allah from their own house (mosque) makes Allah, alias Muhammad, angry -- because it would not have served Muhammad’s purpose. So, he had made it obligatory for his companions to pray at his mosque annexed to his house.

Muhammad lived in constant fear that the victims of his barbaric crimes might attack him in revenge. So, he wanted to be surrounded by his male followers all the time. That’s why he ordered all his male followers (even if they are blind) to assemble in his mosque-cum-house for each prayer. And he led the prayer to maintain his absolute command over them.

Mosque or terrorist training camp?

The actual purpose of assembling all his followers at his mosque was to ensure his personal security, as well as, to give military training to them for the next raid on the neighboring settlements of Pagans, Jews and Christians, who had refused to accept Muhammad as their king.

Narrated Aisha, “Ethiopians (whom Muhammad has purchased with Khadeeja’s wealth) were playing in the mosque (displaying the skill with spears), I saw the Prophet and the Ethiopians were playing with their spears.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari 1:445).

Modern Muslims! Please pay attention! Besides praying, Muhammad and his companions were playing with “spears” at his mosque.

Muhammad also conducted horse races and spear competitions among his companions cum soldiers. (Bukhari 1:412/ 442 & 443).

Tahajut prayer or nightshift of security gaurds?

Muhammad’s usual practice of attacking his so-called enemies was during the dark hours of the night, often the early-morning darkness hour (Khaybar attack). So, he felt insecure during the night hours, lest he becomes the victim of the same tactic from his victims. Muhammad, therefore, conveniently adjusted the timing of 3 prayers (Fajr, Maghrib and Isha) out of 5, to be prayed during the dark hours. Moreover, he intentionally prolonged the praying time of the 5th Isha prayer, so as to retain his followers in the mosque as long as he could. He was very particular about the 1st and the 5th (Fajr and Isha) prayers. He went to such an extent that he commanded his followers not to obey their mothers, if they restrict them to attend the congregational "Isha" prayer with him. (Bukhari Vol. 1, The Chapter of Adhaan, Chapter 29)

And it did not end there. Muhammad went further and ordered his gullible followers to pray mid-night prayers (Tahajut) at their homes. This prayer was performed by his followers in shifts, i.e. one group after another:

Narrated Abu Uthman: I was a guest of Abu Huraira for seven days. Abu Huraira, his wife and his slave used to get up and remain awake for one-third of the night by turn. Each would offer the night prayer and then awaken the other. (Bukhari 7:352).

The purpose, definitely, was to keep his followers, mostly the slaves, awake throughout the night in case of a night-attack by victims by copycatting his own tactic. This prayer was nothing but a defence strategy to ensure Muhammad’s own protection and security. This hadith alone is sufficient to understand the vacuousness of spirituality of Islamic prayers.

Purpose of Itikaaf, Qhiyaam Al-Lail, Tarawih & Lail-Al-Qadr

As mentioned earlier, Muhammad used the cowardly tactic of attacking innocent tribes during night-hours without prior warnings. Actually, those were not wars, but robbery-raids upon innocent people. He did not spare them even during their sacred months. So, Muhammad had to be very vigilant during his proclaimed sacred month, the Ramadan, with the fear of being attacked by his victims. Though he was, as usual, guarded by his guards round the clock, he wanted to have as many guards as possible during the nights of Ramadan. So, he fabricated the theology of ITIKAAF, QHIYAAM AL-LAIL & LAIL-AL-QADR etc. Out of which, his theology of ITIKAAF (Seclusion in a mosque for the purpose of worshipping Allah only) helped him a lot during Ramadan. At first, he began his Itikaaf with his companions, for the first 10 days of Ramadan, and then he extended it to another mid-ten days, and finally to the last ten days of Ramadan also.

Itikaaf for the first 10 days of Ramadan (Bukhari Vol 3:242 & 243)

Itikaaf for the mid ten days of Ramadan (Bukhari Vol 3:244)

Itikaaf for all thirty days of Ramadan (Bukhari Vol 1:777)

Did Muhammad fear Allah?

Muhammad didn’t considered prayers as a spiritual duty for attaining closeness with God. Instead, he designed, changed or prolonged the prayers and its timing according to his personal need.

1. In most occasions Muhammad purposely extended the timing of Isha, the 5th prayer, so as to retain his followers around his as long as he could. In many instances, he came out of his house to lead the Isha prayer very late, when his assembled followers had already gotten tired and were sleeping in the mosque. Muhammad often said: “If supper is served and the Iqaama for Isha prayer is proclaimed, start with your supper first” (Bukhari 1:640-642 & 7:373-374). This instruction is exclusively for the Isha prayer only. Whereas, for the Fajr, the early-morning-darkness-time prayer, his instructions were just the opposite, because he wants his protectors to come to his mosque as soon as possible. How could he change the timings of prayers, ordained by Allah?
2. When Muhammad had no fear of attack by his enemies on heavily raining and very cold days, he allowed his companions to pray at their homes. (Bukhari 1:590, 605, 635 & 637). (No burning of their houses in this case.)
3. Muhammad’s fear of Allah: Once the Iqama is pronounced and the Prophet was talking to a man in a corner of the mosque, and he did not lead the prayer till the people had slept. (Bukhari 1:615-616) (In this way, Muhammad showed his respect toward his Allah. Why should he fear unnecessarily from his own shadow, Allah)
4. There was no harm if the muadh-dhin laughed while pronouncing the Adhaan or Iqaama. (Bukhari Vol. 1, The book of Adhaan, Chapter 10). (What is wrong in that? After all it was only a get-together of Muhammad’s soldiers).
5. Muhammad forbade his followers to spit in the direction of Qibla during prayers, because they were speaking in private with their Allah and should not spit on their right, as there is an angel standing. However Muhammad allowed spitting on their left or under their left foot. (Bukhari 1:399, 404, 405, 408)
6. When Muhammad arrived at Medina, he first stayed in the house of his maternal uncle to protect his life. (Allah didn’t see fit to protect his life).
7. He started praying facing toward the direction of the Jewish Temple Bait-Al-maqdis on his own for 17 months, leaving aside Kaaba, the house of Allah. (Bukhari 1:39).

CONCLUSION: There is nothing spiritual in Islamic prayers; instead, they were designed solely to Muhammad’s personal benefits and advantage, primarily as a strategic measure for his personal protection. The 5-time daily prayers or any other Islamic prayers are, thus, meaningless today, because their real purpose, namely ensuring the security and protection of the commander of Muslims, are not at all a factor today. Nonetheless they do serve a somewhat different purpose today, which is safeguarding the hold of the Arab rulers upon their thrones under the shade of Islam. What is written above on prayers is only a fraction of such embarrassing information; there are much more scattered in Islamic sources.

It is high time for my Muslim brethren to critically analyze these Islamic sources, written by Allah alias Muhammad and the very respectable scholars of Islam, and get enlightened, instead of wasting their valuable time in lifelong head-banging.

Prophet Muhammad was an Apostate of Islam

Muhammad violated too many of Allah's divine laws at whims to serve his interests, desires and lust. He was, thus, an apostate of Islam. He managed to avoid the punishment of apostasy -- death by beheading -- on earth. But what's happening to him in next life. Frolicking with 72 heavenly whores? The Quran may give an inkling (46.9): "I do not know what will be done to me"

---

MUHAMMAD'S OVER-RULING OF ALLAH

Allah says in many places in Quran that he made Mohammad the last prophet after whom he will not send any one else. But Mohammad over-ruled Allah and announced that Jesus will be the last prophet and will come after him.

Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 425:

Allah's Apostle said, "Son of Mary (Jesus) will shortly descend amongst you people”

Muslims party during the night after fasting but Prophet Muhammad partied during the day while fasting

MUHAMMAD DEFIED THE QURAN

Allah said in Quran that his message and words in Quran are final and nothing in it will be changed (15.9). His final words about people of the book are that either they will pay Jizya or they will be killed (9.29). However Mohammad changed it. He said that Jizya will be abolished.

Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 425:

Allah’s Apostle said, "Jesus will break the Cross and kill the pigs and abolish the Jizya"

MUHAMMAD VIOLATED MARRIAGE LAW

Allah allowed Muslims to have up to four wives (Q 4.3) at one time. Mohammad had at least 9 wives with him when he kicked the bucket.

MUHAMMAD ATE AND DRANK DURING FASTING

Allah set rules of fasting in Quran as follows:

Quran 2.287: "Allah Hath ordained (for fasting in Ramadan) for you not to eat or drink from dawn to dusk."

But Muhammad ate and drank as he pleased

Tabaqat by Saad Vol. 1, p. 369:

Muhammad found it difficult to abstain from food and water, from dawn to dusk, so he ate whenever he pleased. Ibn Sa’d writes: “The Messenger of Allâh used to say ‘We the prophets are required to eat our morning food later than others and hurry in breaking our fast in the evening.'” [3]

MUHAMMAD'S SEXUAL ACTIVITIES WHILE FASTING

Allah prohibited any sexual activity during fasting.

The Quran says (002.187): Approach your wives only in the night after completing the fast.

But Prophet Mohammad approached his wives whenever he got turned on.

FOOLING AROUND WITH YOUNG WIVES

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 319:

When fasting Prophet saw naked little Aisha playing with her doll, he got all worked up Prophet’s wife in her izar during menstruation, waiting for a midmorning fondling session by fasting prophet

UM-Salama said, “Allah's Apostle, while fasting called me and took me with him under the woollen sheet."

(Ordering his wife to get under a woolen sheet with him).

MUHAMMAD'S FONDLING, TONGUE SUCKING

Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 13, Number 2380:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) used to kiss her and suck her tongue when he was fasting.

MUHAMMAD'S HUGGING, PETTING AND DISCHARGING

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 31, Number 149:

Ayesha said "The Prophet used to kiss and embrace his wives while he was fasting. The person who gets discharge should complete his fast."

MUHAMMAD'S JOINT BATHING AFTER EJACULATION

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 319:

"Um- Salama said. The Prophet and I used to take the bath of Janaba from a single pot”

MUHAMMAD VIOLATED THE IDDAH LAW

Allah said in Quran that for a widow there is a waiting period (iddah) of three menstrual periods before remarrying (2.234). Mo banged Juavaria, Safia and Rehana the same night he killed their husbands without giving any prescribed waiting period.

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:

Narrated Anas:

Prophet attacked Khaybar unannounced. Their men were killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet (he banged her the same night) .

Bukhari vol 3, Book46, No. 717:

Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day (he banged her the same night).

"Sirat e Rasulullah" by Ishaq, p. 464: "The apostle divided their property, wives and children as booty. He took Rayhana d. Amr b. Khunafa for himself (he banged her the same night)."

MUHAMMAD FROLICKED WITH MENSTRUATING WOMEN

Allah has ordered men to keep away from menstruating women.

Quran 2.222

YUSUFALI: They ask thee concerning women's courses. Say: They are a hurt and a pollution: So keep away from women in their courses, and do not approach them until they are clean.

Muhammad did exactly the opposite. He hugged and kissed them, sucked their tongues, fondled their private parts and even slept with his between their naked thighs.

MUHAMMAD FONDLED YOUNG MENSTRUATING WIVES

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 298:

Narrated 'Aisha:

The Prophet and I used to take a bath from a single pot while we were Junub. During the menses, he used to order me to put on an Izar (dress worn below the waist) and used to fondle me. While in Itikaf, he used to bring his head near me and I would wash it while I used to be in my periods (menses).

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 1, Book 6, Number 319:

Narrated Zainab bint Abi Salama:

Allah's Apostle said, 'Have you got your menses?' I replied, 'Yes.' Then he called me and took me with him under the woolen sheet."

MUHAMMAD PUT HIS CHEEKS BETWEEN NAKED THIGHS OF MENSTRUATING WIVES

One of Prophet’s favourite activities was to lie on top of naked menstruating wives with his chest on their thighs.

Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 1, Number 0270:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:

One night he entered (upon me) while I was menstruating. He said: Come near me. I said: I am menstruating. He said: Uncover your thighs. I, therefore, uncovered both of my thighs. Then he put his cheek and chest on my thighs and I lent upon he until he became warm and slept.

MUHAMMAD COMMITTED ADULTERY

Miraaj: Prophet rode to heaven on a woman-faced buraq or had an adulterous ride in bed with cousin Hani??

Allah has called adultery (sex outside marriage) evil and an abomination.

Quran 17.032: "And come not near unto adultery. Lo! it is an abomination and an evil way."

Quran 24.030: "Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty"

Muhammad violated this prohibition discreetly in Mecca and then openly later in Medina,

MIRAAJ: CELEBRATED ADULTEROUS NIGHT OF THE PROPHET

Islamic literature says (Martin Lings, p.33, 101, 103-104, 299; Ibn Ishaq, p.184, Tabari, vol. viii, p.186) that Muhammad passionately loved his first cousin Hani, daughter of his uncle Abu Talib. She was married to a pagan Hibayrah, but Mo had an adulterous relationship with her. He often sneaked and banged Hani whenever Hibayrah was not around after Khadija had died.

Muhammad’s most famous adulterous night is celebrated all over the world by praying, and cooking special meals. It is called “shab e Mairaj”. Muslims think that Mohammad entered into Heaven that night. Little do they know that Mohammad had entered into Hani, not heaven, that night. Here is the story.

One early morning when Muhammad was sneaking out of Hani’s house after an all night steamy action, his followers who were looking for him, caught him with his pants down. They asked angrily what was he doing with Hani when her husband was out of town. Very embarrassed, he concocted the ridiculous story of having gone to heaven all night riding an animal with a beautiful face of a woman. Most of his die hard followers believed that silly story (but some smarter ones considered it bullshit and quietly left Islam). Actually Muhammad’s story was allegorical. He did ride beautiful Hani who was a wild animal in bed; and he did feel like he was in heaven all night...

Later, when Muhammad became militarily strong and conquered Mecca, he went to Umm Hani's house and stayed there overnight. Umm Hani's husband had foreseen the fall of Mecca and had fled to Najran. And this time probably his followers cheered when he came out of her home after an adulterous night. No body dared to criticize him this time; they had seen his critics getting their heads chopped off.

Prophet Muhammad lusted for men

MUHAMMAD'S LUSTING FOR MEN

The Quran clearly prohibited men for lusting for other men.

Quran 7.81: "…ye practice your lusts on men, ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds."

But Mohammad, who lusted for beautiful women like his son Zaid’s wife Zainab, also lusted for good-looking men like his son Zaid.

Tafsir of al-Qurtubi—an authoritative exegesis in Islam.

Aisha said that, one day, while Muhammad was lying naked in bed, Zaid came knocking; Muhammad, without getting dressed, opened the door and “hugged and kissed him”.

Mohammad also had a crush on a young and handsome young man Zahir.

Sunan Bayhaqi and Al Halabi

According to this hadith, a man named Zahir, who used to say, "The prophet loves me," said that one day Muhammad crept unawares behind him and put him in a bear-hug. Zahir, alarmed, yelled, “Get off me!” After turning his head and discovering that it was Muhammad, he stopped struggling and proceeded to “push his back into the prophet’s chest.”

APOSTATES ARE BEHEADED IN ISLAM

Allah (R), Muhammad's imaginary slave, gave whatever he wanted and needed

In Islam, an apostate is killed by beheading and bleeding to death. When Mohammad was dying a very painful death he thought that Real God was cutting his aorta and bleeding him to death for his sins.

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 713:

Narrated 'Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died said “I feel as if my aorta is being cut."

MORAL OF THE STORY

Muhammad had lied to the world that he received Quran from Allah. He often felt guilty for this deception to gain power wealth and women and causing so much bloodshed; he prayed for forgiveness from the real God whoever it was. He was worried that the l God may punish him in the afterlife. His statement in Quran points to it.

Quran 46.9: I do not know what will be done to me

(No wonder he thought God was beheading him when he was dying).

Courageous Australian Political Advisor Sacked for Speaking the Truth about Islam

All he did is posted violent Quranic verses and duly called Muhammad "the first terrorist in the name of Islam" on his Facebook page.

---

Joseph Adams

Joseph Adams, who worked in the electorate office of the Smithfield Party Liberal of Australia NSW as an adviser, was sacked on Friday for posting violent passages of the Quran on his Facebook page including a description of Prophet Muhammad as "the first terrorist of Islam".

Mr. Adams’ comments angered some of his 1000 Facebook “friends”, which include 15 state government MPs and four ministers.

He was labelled a "bigot" and the ”biggest f—ing racist ever" by his Facebook "friends."

No one will accuse anyone of racism for criticizing Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Communism or any faith or ideology. Yet somehow, some people are convinced that Islam is a race. This false narrative is inculcated in the western world by Muslims many people who refuse to think have bought into it.

”The religious babble you refer to is Islam,” he commented on June 4. ”There was no war. It was terrorism. Muhammad was the first terrorist in the name of Islam.”

He followed up with: “Why are you getting upset? I’m not the one who is teaching others to kill in the name of Islam. Mohommed is not my hero.”

On March 24, he responded to a Facebook ”friend,” Faten Dabs with the comment: ”If you leave Islam it is HALAL for you to be EXECUTED. Lol. No wonder people are afraid to leave Islam.”

Joseph Adams has spoken the truth. The Quran promotes violence and Muhammad was a terrorist. Muslims are afraid of leaving Islam for anyone who does do so, would be killed.

When someone made an absurd comparison between Jesus and Muhammad, and branded him as “a bigot” Adams responded: ”Your biblical quotes are as ridiculous as your comparisons. I guess you never paid attention at Sunday school. Jesus spoke in parables. Mohommed on the other hand gave orders to kill.”

”You seem to like standing up for killers and murderers. Is Ivan Milat a good person too? Perhaps you think Hitler was a great Prophet too? After all he did put a book together called Mein Kampf. Don’t waste our time here Aaron. The only bigot here is someone with an uninformed view.”

Joseph Adams is a courageous man for merely speaking the truth. He, who identifies himself as an Australian of Assyrian Christian descent, told The Sun-Herald on Friday that he was not ”thinking politically” when he made the remarks. It is politically suicidal to speak the truth. ”Rather than listen to what people say about the Koran I decided I would read it myself,” he said.

”It was nothing political. I didn’t think it would be used against me and people would accuse me of being racist.” But sadly we live in a world of bigots and ignoramuses who think Islam is a race and those who speak against this ideology of hate face discrimination and even prosecution.

Facing loss of job, Joseph Adams tried to retract and said, “’What I did was a mistake, I did not think it would be used for political purposes. In my mind I was living in a free society where we value free speech. Why should religion be a taboo subject?”

However, his mistake is to apologize. He should instead fight against being discriminated for speaking the truth. Apologies will only embolden Muslims and they don’t work. The Premier, Barry O’Farrell, did not agree with the apology. Late on Friday a government spokesman said in a statement: ”The comments were totally inappropriate and the staff member has already been terminated.”

Adams’ comments were truth. It is shameful for the O’Farrell to punish a man for speaking the truth. This is a blatant violation of human rights and the freedom of speech. It creates an atmosphere of terror in Australia where those who speak the truth fear doing so and those who promote hate and violence will be emboldened.

Mr O’Farrell won from Labor at the election in one of Sydney’s most multicultural electorates, with 60 per cent of constituents born overseas, primarily Muslims. The politicians who pander to Muslim vote are selling out their freedom for their own politial gain.

Blasphemy Law: A Futile Attempt to Hide the True Face of Islam and Muhammad

Muslims try to hide the true face of Islam and Muhammad by using blasphemy law, censorship, intimidation, death-threats and even murder. But the internet is proving their efforts futile: the mask of Islam and Muhammad are slowly but surely being exposed, potentially spelling the eventual death of Islam.

---

A Muslim author’s view on Blasphemy Law: In the February 2011 edition of the Bangalore-based monthly, Islamic Voice, appeared a very illuminating article, “Is blasphemy a capital crime in Islam?” by A Faizur Rahman. At the outset, the author says that if any one used derogatory words against Prophet Muhammad or insulted him, he used to advise his followers to adopt an attitude of forgiveness and forbearance; but today "Muslim extremism and Islamophobia now enjoy a symbiotic relationship feeding on each other’s fanaticism." Then to repudiate the assassination of Pakistani politician Salman Taseer, he says:

“Salman was killed, as confessed by his murderous bodyguard, for being a staunch opponent of the blasphemy law of Pakistan and seeking Presidential pardon for Aasia Bibi, the Christian woman who was recently awarded the death penalty under section 295-C of the Pakistani Penal Code for allegedly abusing Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).”

The author admits that use of derogatory language against Prophet Muhammad or any other Prophet is considered a great sin in Islam and worthy of death sentence. But his complaint was that the court pronounced the death sentence against Aasia Bibi in a hurry before the charges were incontrovertibly proven. It may be recalled that Lahore High Court judge Arif Iqbal Bhatti was shot dead by extremists in 1997 for acquitting two Christians of blasphemy charges. So, punishment for Aasia Bibi, a Christian, for blasphemy charges understandable. It is death, either be a judicial execution or extrajudicial murder by fanatics.

Does Islam support harsh punishment for blasphemy? The stance of the Quran and Prophet Muhammad on blasphemy is important in the context of the Penal Code for blasphemy in Pakistan (Section 295-C). There are some verses in the Quran, such as 6:68-59, 25:41, 38:4-5, 3:159), in which Allah urges Muhammad to exercise patience and forbearance at the critics of His revelations and mockers of the Prophet. Mr. Rahman also cited a few ahadith to show the Prophet's kindness toward his opponents. For example,

1. “Once a man demanded Muhammad’s debts from him in such a rude manner that his companions wanted to beat him up. But the Prophet said, “Leave him, for he (the creditor) has the right to demand it (harshly).” (Sahih Bukhari).
2. In one occasion, a Jew who was opposed to the Prophet cursed him saying As-saamu-alalikum, (death be upon you) and his wife Ayesha responded with As-saamu ‘alaikum wal-laa’na (death and Allah’s curse be upon you too). Muhammad expressed his strong displeasure saying, “Be gentle and calm, Ayesha.” And when one of his companions sought permission to harm the Jew, the Prophet silenced him with an emphatic “No” (Sahih Bukhari).

Since the above-mentioned verses of the Koran and the ahadith show that neither Allah nor Muhammad was in favour of harsh punishments to those, who used derogatory words against Prophet Muhammad or Allah's revelation, Mr. Rahman argues that section 295 C of Pakistan’s Blasphemy Law is not supported by the Koran and Sunnah. And he is astonished to see the religious frenzy, emotionalism and maddening perversity of the Pakistani extremists in this regard to the extent that one such fanatic has even announced an award of $6,000 to anyone who kills Aasia Bibi if the higher courts acquit her.

“It is precisely this kind of fiendish attitude that fuels Islamophobia across the globe”, says Faizur Rahman, adding:

Such is the sway of these preachers that Muslims in large numbers are falling prey to their manipulative agenda and have started to exhibit a supremacist attitude that looks down upon those who are reluctant to get initiated into their kind of Puritanism”. ...“The only way to neutralise the fanatics is for the moderate majority of the Muslims to morally and financially support the progressive scholars and help them intellectually counter religious chauvinism through the rational teachings of the Quran as done by the Prophet himself.”

Against above Quranic and hadith reference, Mr. Rahman ignored more explicit examples to the contrary, namely Muhammad's assassination of the poetess Asma and two other poets Kab bin Asraf and Abu Afak of Medina for writing poems criticizing his deeds.

Blasphemy law stifles freedom of expression: Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death for blasphemy by the Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini for Rushdie's derogatory depiction of Muhammad in his novel The Satanic Verses, and an Iranian businessman offered a $3 million reward to anyone for carrying out the sentence. Despite Khomeini death, the fatwa remains a permanent threat to Rushdie's life. The death-threat saga to Rushdie extended beyond the person of Rushdie: Professor Hitoshi Igarashi of the University of Tsukuba Ibaraki, the Japanese translator of his novel, was murdered in 1991; its Italian translator was beaten and stabbed in Milan; the novel's Norwegian publisher William Nygaard was shot in 1993; Aziz Nesin, a well-known Turkish satirist, was murdered in the hotel in Sivas, where he had invited people to listen to a speech based on some parts of the book.

Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasrin is another victim of blaspheming the Quran and Muhammad. In May 1994, a death-fatwa was issued against her for saying "…the Koran should be revised thoroughly". She was also under fire for her 1993 book Lajja (Shame).

In Pakistan, Ghulam Akbar, a Shi'a Muslim, was convicted of uttering derogatory remarks against Muhammad in 1998, and was sentenced to death; in August 2000, a Lahore court sentenced Abdul Hasnain Muhammad Yusuf Ali to death and 35 years' imprisonment for "defiling the name of Muhammad".

In 2001, prior to 9/11, American magazine Time printed an illustration of Muhammad along with the Archangel Gabriel waiting for a message from God. The magazine apologized for printing the illustration after widespread protests in Kashmir.

In June 2002, Iranian academic Hashem Aghajari gave a speech and asked Muslims to refrain from blindly following their clergy. He was sentenced to death for "blasphemy against Muhammad" in November 2002.

To assuage Muslims' opposition to the holding of Miss World pageant in Nigeria, This Day newspaper published an article, suggesting that had Muhammad been alive, he would have chosen one of the contestants as his bride -- based on a hadith, in which Ayesha said: Muhammad liked three things, good food, good perfume and women. The commentary sparked deadly riots across Nigeria that claimed over 200 lives.

Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh and Ayaan Hirsi Ali created the 10-minute film Submission in 2004 to highlight the mistreatment of, and violence against, women in Islamic societies. Both van Gogh and Hirsi Ali received death-threats after its release. On November 2, 2004, Van Gogh was stabbed and shot dead by a Muslim fanatic Mohammed Bouyeri in Amsterdam. Interested readers may see Blasphemy Law and Free Speech (Wikipedia Free Enclycopedia) for many similar stories.

Can Blasphemy Law hide the true face of Muhammad? Muslims use blasphemy law, threats and violence etc. to hide the truth about Islam and its prophet forever, but it is proving a futile exercise in the age of Internet, which has emerged as a useful and hard-to-suppress medium for exposing the truth about Muhammad and his evil creed Islam.

Numerous Websites have propped up in the Internet to expose the nature of the Quran and Prophet Muhammad, which is causing a deluge amongst Muslims to leave the cult of Islam. There are numerous Muslim apostates in the Internet -- social networking sites and blogs -- engaged in revealing the true face of Islam. A group of Bangladeshi apostates in the U.K. issued a statement explaining the reason why they have abandoned Islam, which was aired by the BBC. The statement read:

“One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Quran 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way.”

Recently, Dutch MP Geert Wilders, the Chairman of the Dutch Freedom Party and the maker of the short film FITNA, has written an article "Time To Unmask Muhammad", in which he cited many unflattering truths about Muhammad’s life and deeds.

Conclusion: The advent of the Internet has become a serious threat to unmask the true face of Islam and its originator Muhammad. It has enabled critics to overcome the taboo of telling the truth about Islam and Muhammad. As a result, gradually more and more people, both Muslims and non-Muslims, are comprehending the true face of Islam. This is spoiling the well-guarded of the image of Muhammad, which will weaken the central doctrine of the Islamic faith, the Kalema Taib, that says: La Ilaha Illallah, Mohammadur Rasulullah (Allah is the only God to be worshipped and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah). And this may spell the death for Islam. For this reason, more and more Islamic countries are blocking many Websites that are striving to expose the true face Islam and its founder.

References:

Watch these videos:

1. Blasphemy Of Muhammad PBUH Is The Insult Of Islam
2. 25 Blasphemous Images - Muhammad
3. Asia Bibi, The Result of Blasphemy of Muhammad (PBUH)
4. Asia Bibi (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8ai9_H7FvI&feature=related)
5. Asia Bibi blasphemy case - Pakistani Islam and Peace (English subtitles)
6. Blasphemous Law In Pakistan, 01
7. Blasphemous Law in Pakistan, 02

Time To Unmask Muhammad

To know why Islam is a mortal danger one must not only consider the Koran but also the character of Muhammad, who conceived the Koran and the entirety of Islam.

---

The Koran is not just a book. Muslims believe that Allah himself wrote it and that it was dictated to Muhammad in the original version, the Umm al-Kitab, which is kept on a table in heaven. Consequently one cannot argue with the contents. Who would dare to disagree with what Allah himself has written? This explains much of Muhammadan behaviour, from the violence of jihad to the hatred and persecution of Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims and apostates. What we in the West regard as abnormal, is perfectly normal for Islam.

A second insuperable problem with Islam is the figure of Muhammad. He is not just anyone. He is al-insan al-kamil, the perfect man. To become a Muslim one must pronounce the Shahada (the Muslim creed). By pronouncing the Shahada one testifies that there is no god that can be worshipped except Allah, and one testifies that Muhammad is his servant and messenger.

The Koran, and hence Allah, lays down that Muhammad’s life must be imitated. The consequences of this are horrendous and can be witnessed on a daily basis.

There has been much analysis of Muhammad’s mental sanity. In spite of all the available research, it is rarely mentioned or debated. It is a taboo to discuss the true nature of the man whom one and a half billion Muslims around the world regard as a holy prophet and example to be followed. That taboo must be breached in the West, and here in the Netherlands.

Ali Sina is an Iranian ex-Muslim who established the organisation for apostates of Islam Faith Freedom International. In his latest book he posits that Muhammad is a narcissist, a paedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, a madman, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter. Sina has offered 50,000 dollars for the one who can prove otherwise. Nobody has claimed the reward as yet. And no wonder, as the description is based on the Islamic texts themselves, such as the hadiths, the descriptions of Muhammad’s life from testimonies of contemporaries.

The historical Muhammad was the savage leader of a gang of robbers from Medina. Without scruples they looted, raped and murdered. The sources describe orgies of savagery where hundreds of people’s throats were cut, hands and feet chopped off, eyes cut out, entire tribes massacred. An example is the extinction of the jewish Kurayza tribe in Medina in 627. One of those who chopped off their heads was Muhammad. The women and children were sold as slaves. Confronted with the lunacy of Islamic terrorists today, it is not hard to find out where the lunacy comes from.

In Vienna the women’s rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was recently sentenced to paying a fine for insulting a religion by calling Muhammad a paedophile. However, that is the truth. Numerous hadiths contain testimonies by Muhammad’s favourite wife, the child wife Aisha. Aisha literally says: “The prophet married me when I was six years old, and had intercourse with me when I was nine.”

According to the historian Theophanes (752-817) Muhammad was an epileptic. Epileptic crises are sometimes accompanied by hallucinations, perspiration form the forehead and foaming at the mouth, the very symptoms which Muhammad displayed during his visions.

In his book "The other Muhammad" (1992) the Flemish psychologist dr. Herman Somers concludes that in his forties the “prophet” began to suffer from acromegaly, a condition caused by a tumor in the pituitary gland, a small organ that is situated just below the brain. When the tumor in the pituitary gland causes too much pressure in the brain, people start to see and hear things that are not there. Somers’s psychopathological diagnosis of Muhammad’s condition is: organic hallucinatory affliction with paranoid characteristics.

The German medical historian Armin Geus speaks of a paranoid hallucinatory schizophrenia. A similar analysis can be found in the book “The Medical Case of Muhammad” by the physician Dede Korkut.

In his book "Psychology of Mohammed: Inside the Brain of a Prophet", Dr. Masud Ansari calls Muhammad “the perfect personification of a psychopath in power.” Muhammad had a unhinged paranoid personality with an inferiority complex and megalomaniac tendencies. In his forties he starts having visions that lead him to believe he has a cosmic mission, and there is no stopping him.

The truth is not always pleasant or politically correct. On the basis of the research referred to above it can be argued that the Islamic creed obliges one and a half billion people around the world, including the one million living in the Netherlands, to take Muhammad as their example. There is no turning back once one has become a Muslim. For even though article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that every person has the right to “change his religion or belief,” in Islam there is a death penalty for leaving the faith.

Anyone who voices criticism of Islam and Muhammad is in grave personal danger – as I have experienced. And whoever attempts to escape from the influence of Islam and Muhammad risks death. We cannot continue to accept this state of affairs. A public debate about the true nature and character of Muhammad can provide insight and support to Muslims all over the world who wish to leave Islam.

Apostates are heroes and more than ever they deserve the support of freedom loving people all over the world. Party politics should not be at play in this matter. It is time for us to help these people by exposing Muhammad.

Humanitarian Muhammad: Did Muhammad Abolish Slavery?

That is the grossest lie and only Muslim can claim so, because lying to mislead the kafirs in the interest of Islam is a religiously-sanctioned doctrine in Islam, called Taqiyya, for which they will be richly rewarded by Allah.

---

Slavery and Islam

It has been mentioned in the previous article, The True Color of Humanitarian Muhammad, that the Bengali Muslim author Kazi Masum Akhtar wrote in his essay, “Manabatabadi Hajrat Muhammad (S)” (i.e. Humanitarian Hajrat Muhammad):“Abolition of slavery was one of his declared policy. But his most important step was to declare jihad for liberating the women by breaking the stubborn wall of gender apartheid of the dark middle ages.”

Mr. Akhtar tries to impress upon his readers that Muhammad abolished slavery. In reality, Muhammad approved slavery as Allah considered slavery as a social and lawful institution. Justifying slavery Allah says in the Koran: “Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave-girls whom God has given you as booty." (33:50) This verse clearly mentions that, for a Muslim, taking slaves, or more pointedly sex-slaves, in war is a God-given right; and it certainly impossible for Muhammad to disobey Allah’s will.

In fact is:

"Islam institutionalized slavery. Muhammad began to take slaves after he moved to Medina, and had power. Slaves were usually taken in raids on nearby (non-Muslim) Arab tribes, or war, either through offensive or defensive actions. Islam allows the taking of slaves as "booty", or reward for fighting. This has led to numerous "jihads" by Muslim states and tribes to attack other non-Muslim groups and obtain slaves. Islamic jurisprudence laid down regulations for the proper treatment of slaves. However, abuses have occurred throughout history”, says Silas (real name unknown). He also says, “From the days that Muhammad drew his sword to rob and conquer non-Muslims to this very day, Muslims have been taking non-Muslims, and even other black Muslims, as slaves.”[i]

According to scholar says K S Lal:

“Slaves were mainly prisoners of war, but destitutes, debtors and convicted criminals were also sometimes drafted into slavery and commandeered for specific assignments. …In ancient Egypt, as elsewhere, slaves supplied the labour force and were used in any capacity and for any type of work. An almost fabulous number of slaves were employed for the building the Pyramids of Egypt dating from 3000 B.C. to 2300 B.C. According to Herodotus,(the ancient Greek historian) the Great Pyramid (of Cheops) took 100,000 men for ten years to make a causeway 3000 feet long in order to facilitate the transport of stone from the quarries, and the same number of men for twenty years more to complete the pyramid itself. Modern research considers these figures to be exaggerated as Herodotus inquired from people during his journeys and depended on hearsay. What is important in this regard is that the nine pyramids existing at present, are supposed to have been built by respective kings as tombs and memorials of themselves by a very substantial labour force. Slaves in Egypt were also employed on various other jobs."[ii]

Lal adds:

“Among the Greeks also slavery was a rooted institution. In two city states or poleis (singular polis means a city plus its environment) of Athens and Sparta slavery prevailed as also in other lesser known city states. Ancient Greek society was divided into three classes. …In Rome also slavery was extensively prevalent. There the great landed estates were accumulated in a few hands and the cultivation of these lands was done mostly by swarms of slaves leaving war as the chief occupation of honour for the elitist citizens. …The Prophet (Muhammad) himself had made slaves in war and peace. …The Islamised Arabs started taking pride in keeping male and female slaves.”

Historically, the major juristic schools of Islam traditionally have accepted slavery as religiously sanctioned institution. The Islamic prophet Muhammad and many of his companions bought, sold, freed, and captured slaves. It has been mentioned in the previous article that after defeating Banu Koraiza Jews, a community of some 2000 heads in Medina, Muhammad had enslaved the 1200 women and children and distributed amongsy Muslims after massacring about 800 of their adult men. The Prophet took one-fifth of them as his own share of the booty. He distributed some of them among his closest followers and sent the rest to the slave-market at Nejd, to be sold as slaves.

On one occasion, Muhammad took a male-slave to his daughter Fatema’s house to present the slave to her. At that moment, Fatema was not properly dressed and she became busy to cover herself with her veil. But Muhammad told her that though he was a male, but a slave and it was not necessary for her to cover herself in before a slave. After the battle of Badr, Muslims could capture many of the defeated Koreish army. All of them were turned into slaves and freed in exchange of fat ransom. All these incidents reflect that, Muhammad accepted slavery as an established social custom and he neither said word against slavery and nor he took any step to stop this inhuman practice.

Furthermore,

“In Islamic law the topic of slavery is covered at great length. The Qur'an (the holy book) and the hadith (the sayings of Muhammad) see slavery as an exceptional condition that can be entered into under certain limited circumstances. Only children of slaves or non-Muslim prisoners of war could become slaves, never a freeborn Muslim. They also consider manumission of a slave to be one of many meritorious deeds available for the expiation of sins. According to Sharia, slaves are considered human beings and possessed of some rights on the basis of their humanity. In addition, a Muslim slave is equal to a Muslim freeman in religious issues and superior to the free non-Muslim.”

“Muslims were enslaving black Africans long before any slave ships sailed for the New World. Muslims were taking and making slaves all over the lands they had conquered. Later, when slave ships were loaded with black slaves, often, a Muslim slave broker had the human cargo all ready to go. American slavers rarely had to go into inland to capture slaves, they were already waiting there, courtesy of some Muslim ruler, and/or slave broker! In many cases, if the black slaves were not sent to the New World, they were sent to the Mideast to be enslaved by Arabs, or kept by other black Muslims as slaves.” [ref. 1]

Koran approves slavery

From the following verses of the Koran, it becomes evident that Allah approves slavery as a standard social practice:

“The believers truly believe in the Day of Judgement and dread the punishment of their Lord, for none is secure from the punishment of their Lord, and restrain their carnal desire, save with their wives and slave-girls, for these are lawful to them.” (70:26-30) Also “Marry of the women, who seem good to you, two, three or four of them. But if you fear that you cannot maintain equality -among them, marry one only or any slave-girls you may own.” (4: 3) [The term “slave-girls” in the above two verses stands for women purchased in lieu of money, as any other commodity of commerce; and also non Moslem women captured as captives by the Muslims in a battle.]

This verse tells how Muslim males are allowed to have sexual relations with their wives and slave-girls. Implicit in this is that Muslim males can have slave-concubines. The verse (23.5) also tells an almost similar story. Mariyah and her sister Sirin were slave-girls given as gifts to Muhammad by Egyptian governor. Muhammad gave Sirin to Hasan Thabit, the poet. Ibn Sa'd says that Muhammad "liked Mariyah, who was of white complexion, with curly hair and pretty." Ibn Sa'd's "Tabaqat", gives a clear description of Muhammad having sexual relations with Mariyah, his Coptic slave.

Elsewhere the Quran says: “You are forbidden to take in marriage married women, except those(captives) whom you own as slaves (your right hands possess). Such is the decree of Allah.” (4: 24) [The term “married women” in this verse stands for believing married women. As for the non-believing women, whether married or un-married, the Muslims can do anything to them; in fact Muslims have a divine right to even kill those disbelieving women, and as such to enjoy them sexually , even by force, is a much less punishment to them— it is rather a mercy.]

A subset of other verses of Allah that support slavery are:

1. “If any of you cannot afford to marry a free believing woman, let him marry a slave-girl who is a believer.” (4:25) “Show kindness to the slaves, whom you own.” (4:36)
2. “He (a believer) that accidentally kills a believer must free one Muslim slave.” (4:92)
3. “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war. We well know the duties We have imposed on the faithful concerning their wives and those whom they own as slave-girls.” (33:50) [The spoil of war means women captured by them as booty. A Captive woman, as per Islamic law, automatically becomes a slave. This verse clearly shows that Muslims believe that taking slaves in war was a God-given right. These slaves were considered 'booty' or the spoils of war. As the saying goes, “to the victors go the spoils.”
4. “It shall be unlawful for you (Muhammad) to take more wives or to change your present wives for other women, though their beauty pleases you, except where slave-girls are concerned.” (33:52)

The Quran also instructs Muslims not to force their female slaves into prostitution (24:34), and even allows Muslims to marry slaves if they so desire, and to free them at times as a penalty for crime or sin (4:92, 5:89, 58:3) and even allows slaves to buy their liberty, if they meet certain of their master's conditions (24:33). “While I think it's nice to allow a slave to obtain his freedom, (at his master's discretion) it is tragic that Islam allows them to be enslaved in the first place. That's like robbing a bank and giving some of the money back to the bank, and thinking you did the right thing,” says author Silas. Silashas quoted several hadiths Bukhari and others in his article to show that the hadiths also support slavery. (ref. 1)

Muhammad supported and patronized slavery

Kazi Masum Akhtar claims that Muhammad abolished slavery. But his deeds bear witness that he supported and patronized slavery for the benefit of Islam; more importantly, for his personal benefits. In the 82 raids and wars on non-Muslim settlements, which Muhammad had organized and/or led in his 10-year-stay in Medina, his main aim was to obtain spoils or war-booty. Men and women captured in such raids were also considered war-booty and were kept or sold as slaves. The young and charming girls were used as sex-slaves by Muhammad and his companions. Muhammad used to take one-fifth of the booty as holy khoom and he used to pick the most charming girls in the lot as his personal sex-slave, with whom he usually had sex with on the same night.

In one instance, the Muslims attacked the Banu Mustaliq, and took the women and children slaves after slaughtering their men. The female-slaves were distributed amongst his Muslim soldiers. Being away from home for long, the soldiers were craving for sex and wanted to have sex with the female captives. But they were also worried that if they fell pregnant from the sex-act, their market-value will drop. So, they went to Muhammad and asked if they could do coitus interruptus (i.e. release the semen outside). He advised them to have sex with the slaves, but not to practice coitus interruptus. In effect, Muhammad okayed the rape of the female prisoners. Muhammad took Juwareya, the prettiest young captive in the lot and forced her to have sex with him on the same night.

Muhammad used to barter his slaves, obtained as war booty, in exchange of horses and other weapons for launching jihad or organizing raids against non-Muslim Arab settlements for capturing more.

After Muhammad's death, his cousin Jubair became filthy rich and left 1000 slaves behind when he died.

Above discussion makes it crystal-clear that neither Muhammad did, nor Islam does, take any step to abolish slavery. On the contrary, Muhammad engaged in slavery in his founding years of Islam. Moreover, Muhammad himself used the young and pretty female-captives Rihana (of Banu Koreiza), Juweria (of Banu Mustaliq), Safiya (of Banu Nadir, Khaybar) and others as sex-slaves; indeed, he raped them on the same night he had massacred all their husbands and other male family members. So the idea of Muhammad abolishing slavery cannot arise; any allusions to such a possibility are pure lies.

And following the legacy of Muhammad, Arab Muslims carried out lucrative slave-trade from 8^th century to 19^th century, across the world. As a matter of fact, slave-trade continued in Sudan till 2005. The Islamist government in Sudan used the state machinery to organize raids in predominantly Christian southern Sudan to capture unarmed common villagers and transport them as slaves to the Arab and Gulf countries. This oppression on the people of southern Sudan went on up to 2005.

So Kazi Masum Akhtar's claim that Muhammad abolished slavery is not supported by facts; instead Muhammad did exactly the opposite vis-à-vis slavery. But Mr. Akhtar has not committed any offence by telling such blatant lies, because telling such lies to deceive infidels in the interested of Islam is a religiously sanctioned doctrine in Islam, called taqiyyah, and he will be rewarded by Allah.

---

[i] Slavery in Islam: http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/slavery.htm)

[ii] K S Lal, Muslim Slave System in Mediaeval India. Library- www.islam-watch.org

The True Color of Humanitarian Muhammad

A deceptive Muslim scholar spout blatant lies to depict Muhammad as the greatest humanitarian in history. This article reveals the true color of Muhammad's humanitarianism...

---

This year, February 16 was 12^th of Rabi-ul-awwal in Islamic Hijri calendar. On this day in 570 AD Hajarat Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, was born in the city of Mecca. On this very day, he also left this material world in 632 AD. Muslims across the world observe this day as Eid milad-un-nabi or Fateha Doaz Daham. The 16^th February edition of Bartaman, a Kolkata based Bengali daily, published an article “Manabatabadi Hajrat Muhammad (S)” (i.e. Humanitarian Hajrat Muhammad), written by a Muslim writer Kazi Masum Akhtar.

It is well known that the All-Knowing and All-Observing Allah has given a clean chit to every Muslim to tell lies to glorify Islam and its Prophet, known as Taqiyyah or 'holy deception'. And Akhtar has exploited this sanction of Allah to the fullest extent by telling outright lies about the life and deeds of Prophet Muhammad. In a nut shell, he has made a sheep out of a hyena.

The reader can guess that projecting Muhammad as a humanitarian person is an outrageous lie. Neither was Muhammad, nor is his creed called Islam, humanitarian. If at all, Islamic humanitarianism or brotherhood is confined amongst Muslims alone; for non-Muslims, Islam has nothing but hatred and terror. And Muhammad, the founder and propagator of this creed, exercised this hatred and terror toward non-Muslims in the fullest extent. Swami Vivekananda accurately articulated the so-called Islamic humanitarianism and brotherhood as thus: “Mohammedans talk of universal brotherhood, but what comes out of that in reality? Anybody who is not a Mohammedan will not be admitted into this brotherhood; he will more likely to have his throat cut.” (‘Complete works of Swami Vivekananda, Vol. 4, p. 380, 1990)

To begin his article, Mr. Akhtar writes:

“On this auspicious day we should remember how an illiterate, orphan and a poor shepherd, who from his childhood, belonged to a society that was immersed in the darkness of ignorance, could raise Islam as a World religion with unthinkable rapidity, as if by magic? What was his tool behind this achievement? History tells us that his message of equality and brotherhood, or in other words, the timeless principle of humanitarianism was that infallible weapon. The chief aim of his religious instructions and conducts was to bring the entire humanity into a disciplined force for the well being of the entire humanity. So, even today, after passage of so many centuries, his teachings and ideals are relevant and pertinent. It is because, Prophet Muhammad had translated and adapted all his teachings in his own life. His life was an uncompromising commentary of the holy Koran.”

The author continues:

“The Prophet wanted to instill these ideas into every heart and he succeeded to accomplish his mission. Swami Vivekananda could grasp this point and said, “If any religion could move up to the first step of socialism then it is the religion of Islam.” (But the author has not provided the source wherefrom he has collected this quotation) It was Prophet Muhammad, who unequivocally said, “The exploitation of an individual or a group of people by another group of people cannot be tolerated. Every individual must have the right to have an equal share of produced goods. Only labour must be the basis of production, distribution and lively-hood of every individual. No one should have right to others’ labour and to accumulate that.”

The lies

Let us see what Mr Kazi Masum Akhtar wants to say. Muslims are used to lying or deceiving shameless when it comes to their religion; they are not ashamed of telling outrageous lies, as their creed inspires them to lies for the benefit of Islam. Islam is barbaric and inhuman in its heart, and if the Muslims tell the truth, the world would learn about its heinous color and it would fall apart like a house of sand. So, the author says: due its humanitarian appeal, Islam could have become a world religion within short span of time. In reality, all original biography of Muhammad and history books of Islam tell us that this so-called humanitarianism of Islam was the sword or forcible conversion at the point of sword that helped the quick spread of Islam. Swami Vivekananda right said: “…Muslims are …most sectarian. Their watch-word is: there is one God (Allah), and Mohammed is His Prophet. Everything beyond that is not only bad, but must be destroyed forthwith, at a moment’s notice, every man or woman who does not exactly believe in that must be killed; everything that does not belong to this worship must be immediately broken; every book that teaches anything else must be burnt. From the Pacific to the Atlantic, for five hundred years blood ran all over the world. That is Mohammedanism (Islam)!” …“In this line the Mohammedans were the best off; every step forward was made with the word the Koran in the one hand and the sword in the other” Take the Koran, or you must die; there is no alternative." (ibid, Vol 4, p. 126, p. 369-370)

The author tries to impress that the message of Islam is equality of man and humanitarianism. But those, acquainted with even a, b, c of Islam, know that it divides the entire humanity sharply into two categories: Muslims or Momins and non-Muslim infidels or kafirs. Islam truly means surrender or submission, not peace. In Islamic context, it stands for unconditional surrender to commands of the Koran and Prophet Muhammad. Those, who surrender to Koran and Prophet Muhammad, are imandar Mussalmans; those, who do not, are despicable kafirs. Allah holds intense hatred for the kafirs and instructs the Muslims to do likewise.

In the eye of Allah, kafirs are the worst of all creatures, and He instructs Muslims to hate, attack, torture, kill them, to plunders wealth, and to take their women and children as captives, with women to be raped as sex-slaves.

Amongst the Koran's kafir-hating verses are:

1. “We have created, for hell, many genii (races) of men, ….and they are like brute beasts” (7.179)
2. “Verily, those who disbelieve our signs, we will surely cast them to be broiled in the hell-fire, so often as their skins shall be well burnt, We will give them new skins in exchange, so that they may taste the sharper torment” (4.56)
3. “Whosoever followeth any religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted of him in this life, and in the next life he shall be of those who perish” (3.85)
4. “I will cast a dread into their hearts of the unbelievers” (8.12)
5. “Therefore cut off their heads, and strike off all the ends of the fingers. This shall they suffer because they have opposed Allah and His Prophet, and whosoever shall oppose Allah and His Prophet, verily Allah will be severe in punishing them” (8.13)
6. "moreover, as for the non-believers, I will punish them with grievous punishments in this world, and in the world is to come” (3.56)
7. “Allah loves not the unbelievers” (3.57)
8. “they shall suffer a grievous punishment” (3.77).

In light of these hatred-inciting verses of Allah, Dr Ambedkar rightly observed:

“Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslim and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating… The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is the brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity but its benefit is confined to the Muslims alone. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity.”

To highlight this aspect of Islam, Dr Ali Sina, an scholar of Islam from Iran, says:

“The Quran is a book full of hate of the nonbelievers. To overlook this fact is a gross error that could cost millions of lives. … In Islam, terrorism is prescribed in the Quran; it is encouraged and recommended. The prophet of Islam laid the example of terror for all followers to follow. He raided civilians, massacred his prisoners of war, raped their women (for example, Mohhammed raped Jewish woman Rehana after killing all her male family members) enslaved women and children, looted their belongings, assassinated his opponents, burned trees, and showed no mercy to any one who dared to stand in his way. Muslim terrorists are just doing that. You cannot fight Islamic terrorism without fighting Islam.”

Mr. Akhtar has tried to convince that Muhammad had said: "The exploitation of an individual or a group of people by another group of people cannot be tolerated. Every individual must have the right to have an equal share of produced goods. Only labour must be the basis of production, distribution and lively-hood of every individual. No one should have the right to exploit others’ labor and to accumulate that.”

It seems from the quotation that Muhammad was a Marxist; he was a true originator of Marx’s theory of socialism many centuries earlier than Marx. The author, one can fathom, indirectly suggests that Marx borrowed his theory from Muhammad.

Muhammad was a Mass Murderer

While Mr. Akhtar intends to establish that Muhammad was a great humanitarian, but his life and deeds after his immigration to Medina tells a diagonally opposite story. There lived 3 major Jewish clans -- namely Beni Kanuika, Beni Nadir and Beni Koreiza -- in Medina. These Jews were rich and well-off in Medina. Muhammad tried to convert them to Islam. And when it became clear that the Jews were not going to accept Islam, they became the target of Muhammad’s extreme hatred and violence. Meanwhile, Allah, reading Muhammad's mind well, revealed a verse, terming the Jews "apes and pigs".

Muhammad became hell-bent on evicting or exterminating the Jewish communities of Medina, thereby, to grab their riches and wealth. To that end, he first warned them to embrace Islam; otherwise they should be ready to face grave consequences. At the same time, he produced a series of Jihad verses to empower Muslims to kill any Jew at anytime and anywhere. His first victim was the Jewish clan of Beni Kanuika, after suffering defeat and surrender, agreed to leave Medina, leaving most of their belongings behind.

Next, one day, Muhammad went to house of Beni Nadir leader to discuss some dispute, and suddenly he rushed to Medina without telling anyone the reason for his departure. Later on, he brought the allegation that the Jews had planned to crush him by rolling down a stone from the top of a house. Based on this unsubstantiated accusation, he ordered them to evacuate from Medina. When the Beni Nadir Jews declined to leave Medina and the Muslims put their fortified colony under seize. Ultimately, the entire tribe, except two families who converted to Islam, had to leave Medina. Some of them settled at Khaibar, a place nearly 100 miles in the north of Medina and the rest moved further ahead to Syria.

In 626 AD, the Prophet brought allegation against the Beni Koreiza that they had entered into a secret intrigue with the Koraish of Mecca against Muslims, an allegation that was never substantiated. After attacking and defeating them, a 'kangaroo court' was set up by Muhammad, headed by Sa’d -- fanatic follower of his -- and he issued a bloody verdict: all the able men would be beheaded, women and children would be captured as slaves. About 800 adult male-members of the tribe, judged by pubic hair growth, slaughtered on that day. The Prophet selected young Rihana, most beautiful among the women, to be his sex-slave.

To describe the incident Sir W Muir, the celebrated biographer of Muhammad, writes:

“The butchery, begun in the morning, lasted all day, and continued by torchlight till the evening. Having thus drenched the market-place with the blood of seven or eight hundred victims, and having been commanded for the earth to be smoothed over their remains, Mohammad returned from the horrid spectacle to solace himself with the charms of Reihaha, whose husband and all her male relatives had just perished in the massacre. He invited her to be his wife; but she declined, and chose to remain his slave or concubine”. The Life of Mahomet, Voice of India, New Delhi, 1992).

This author has never seen a Bengali Muslim biographer of Muhammad narrate this cold-blooded massacre of 800 people by the Prophet. Only one Bengali biographer, Abdul Aziz Al Aman, has mentioned it in his Kabar Pathey (On the Road to Kaaba): he called the massacre of the Koreiza Jews a blot in the history of Prophet’s stay in Medina as well as a blot on Islam. So, obviously apologists like Mr Kazi Masum Akhtar will always refrain from describing this bloody episode of their Prophet; because it would then be impossible to portray Muhammad as a humanitarian and apostle of peace. During his 10-year stay in Medina, Muhammad organized 82 raids, as a part of his jihad, on non-Muslim settlements and caravans of Arabia, massacring thousands who refused to accept Islam. Out of these 82 raids, Muhammad participated in 26.

The Beni Nadir, who had settled at Khaibar after being evicted from Medina, suffered worst violence later on. In August, 628 AD, he invaded Khaibar with a 1600-strong army after sunrise (just after finishing the fazr or early morning prayer), when the inhabitants of Khaibar were totally unprepared. Massacre of unarmed people continued throughout the day drenching the land with blood. Young Kinana was the leader of the Jews. Information reached Muhammad from a traitor Jew that Kinana had concealed his treasure of gold ornaments and utensils, which he had received as dowry while marrying Safiya. One would be shocked to know the inhuman torture that Muhammad inflicted on Kinana to force him reveal where he hid the treasure. Muhammad placed burning charcoal on his chest and fanned it to glow red hot. Many believe that the torture continued till the burning charcoal penetrated Kinana’s heart and lungs. When another Jew disclosed the secret place, Kinana was beheaded. Safiya, Kinana’s wife, aged 17, was extremely beautiful and Muhammad took her as his sex-slave and raped Safiya her on the same night. Such was the most humanitarian Prophet of Islam.

Prophet Muhammad, the embodiment of mercy?

The author Kazi Masum Akhtar then writes, “As the basis of Muhammad’s teachings, he used to say – It is the birthright of every individual to for freedom and equal dignity and self respect. He praised the idea of international brotherhood." He also said, “The entire human society is a member of the one world-family of man and hence every man is equal before the law.” This was the fundamental spirit of his teachings regarding an ideal state. To protect religious tolerance and the safety of the religious minority community, he said, “If in an Islamic state or in a society dominated by the Muslims, the people of the religious minority are deprived of their rights, then it would be a cursed society and Allah will not forgive those who are responsible to bring such inequality.”

When Muslim tell such blatant lies, they can't provide reference, never they will. We have seen above, how Muhammad dealt with the Jews, a religious minority group, in Medina. We also see how the minority groups like Jews, Hindus, Christians and Buddhists are being treated in the Islamic states like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Egypt, and so on---although much better than how Muhammad's barbaric treatment of minorities. Muslims' persecution of non-Muslim communities in those countries is only a legacy of Muhammad’s own treatment of the Jews and other non-Muslim Arabs of Medina.

The author then writes,

“Prophet Muhammad, the embodiment kindness and compassion, to feel the torment and agony of the poor and unprivileged, accepted poverty and insolvent life till his death. His mission was to help the poverty stricken people of the society to make their ends meet. The introduction of mandatory jakat (kind of today’s income tax) and fitra (alms) were two pillars of his program for helping the poor. The unfortunate slaves and even the birds and animals were not deprived of his kindness. Innumerable such examples are strewn in the pages of the Koran and the Hadiths.”

We have seen above, how Muhammad -- an alleged embodiment of kindness and compassion -- could massacre the Koreiza Jews of Medina, and enslave and sell the women and children. The young and charming girls were not sold, but distributed amongst his jihadis for using as sex-slaves, with Muhammad himself keeping the prettiest catch of the lot as his personal sex-slave. The Muslim migrants, who came to medina with the Prophet, were very poor. They were called muhajirs or refugees, and the rich converts of Medina, who helped these muhajirs, were called ansars. At first, Muhammad tried to create a fund by collecting sadka (alms) from the well-off Muslims to be distributed among the muhajirs. After passage of time, this sadka turned into mandatory jakat. It is interesting to note, though Muhammad made jakat mandatory for every Muslim, but he refused to pay the same. He used to say, “There is no jakat for me and the families of my kin.” Such was the kindness and compassion of Muhammad for the poor.

Kazi Masum Akhtar then writes: “It was Muhammad, who said - After getting a work done by a laborer, he should be paid in full before drying up of his sweat. One day, he saw a man drawing water from a well and offering that to a dog to drink and said, “This man (for showing compassion to a street dog), would certainly enter Allah’s paradise.” In reality, Muhammad hated dogs, which is well-known. He used to say that the dogs were embodiment of the Satan. On one occasion, he ordered his followers to kill all the street dogs of Medina, which was promptly carried. For this reason, dogs are hated in Islam; it is un-Islamic, even today, to keep dogs as pet.

Kazi Masum Akhtar then writes, “Abolition of slavery was one of his declared policy. But his most important step was to declare jihad for liberating the women by breaking the stubborn wall of gender apartheid of the dark middle ages.” These claims on abolition of slavery and liberation of women of Kazi Masum Akhtar deserve an elaborate discussion; we hope to tackle them in the next part of the article.

Read part 2: Humanitarian Muhammad: Did Muhammad Abolish Slavery?

Free Speech Campaign: “Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”

Freedom of speech cannot be granted. It can only be taken. Take it now!

Attributes of Allah - The Most Imaginary

Imagine there is this benevolent God, who created us out of nothing, provided us with everything and delivered us from punishment. Yes, just imagine and leave it at that.

Allah is the Batin, as claimed by Muhammad in his book, the Qur’an. He is hidden, unseen and any glimpse that you will ever have of him is through imagination. Any claim of proof in Qur’an by no means shows any solid evidence. Repeating verse by verse, asserting how the pondering over the creation would show us how real Allah is. We have pondered and we have searched. We see no proof of Allah - unless we imagine it?
Allah is just a concept, like all those Gods, who live in the thoughts of their believers, which is just but a figment of your imagination! A figment of imagination that was brought down generations to you, and now you dwell in the horrors unimaginable that could befall upon you and everyone around you, should you stop imagining. So imagine that there is this cruel beast, called Allah, who enjoys the violent murdering and sadistic suffering of human beings. Grow out of your childhood imaginations and those that you were forced to imagine; and realize the reality that you are shielded from.

The following is a joint project initiated by Gates of Vienna. Please grab the image from this post below, and use.

Text below is from GOV

An EDL protester was recently fined £200 for “making offensive comments about Allah” during a demonstration in Leicester. Even though police officers and the EDL were the only ones able to hear what he said, the prosecution said people were “likely to be offended” and the police were “likely to have been alarmed”. His words were considered “threatening, abusive or insulting” and likely to cause “harassment, alarm or distress”. The convicted man said he did not think he would offend anyone. But suppose he had intended offense? Why is that a legal issue? Why is offending someone the sole basis for prosecution in countries that supposedly uphold civil liberties for their citizens?

Vlad Tepes and gates of vienna discussed the issue for a while and devised the following response: This became a Vlad-Baron joint venture, with Vlad doing the video and the talking, and GOV doing the image and the spelling — a win-win for everyone.

“Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”

We are launching a new protest campaign that aims to drive a wedge into the thin crack between leftists and the Muslims. We’re going to do this with this image [point at it], and the slogan: “Allah is Muhammad’s Imaginary Friend”. We aim for protesters to get arrested for having a picture that shows Muhammad talking to a giant bunny. In fact, participants must insist on being arrested, and on being tried. By doing this we proclaim our fundamental rights, which were not granted to us, but were always ours, and are only now being taken away by the tyranny of state power.

These rights include the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the freedom of religion — including the right to have no religion at all.

We will go to jail for saying that Allah is imaginary.

We will say nothing about Muslims being violent.

We will say nothing insulting at all, only that their god is imaginary. If someone chooses to be insulted by this, that is his/her decision.

Any atheist [Kafir] has the right to say what we say. It is one of our fundamental freedoms Vlad suggests that people download the image from his site and make T-shirts for themselves and friends, for placards, signs, posters, etc. At demonstrations, participants should chant the slogan while waving a card or sign. And everyone should stick to the slogan, and not be sidetracked into calling Muslims “thugs” and so on, because that just supports the idea that we are evil insulting people. Stick to message, and go to jail for saying that Allah is imaginary.

Simple, yet effective!

Even the most diehard leftists will choke hard when they are forced to condemn us as “racists”. Muslims will be offended, of course, and that will serve as grounds for our arrest. This will only serve to emphasize that all speech that does not agree with the Koran and the hadith and the sunna of the prophet is offensive to Muslims, and must be prohibited. And the fact that our governments prohibit it means that they are enforcing full shari’ah upon everyone, not just on Muslims alone! Which is a violation of our rights, the same rights that our government claims to protect when they arrest us for saying that Allah is Mohammed’s imaginary friend…?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq5qNTcctwc&feature=player_embedded